Thursday, June 11, 2009
Ireland u20's challenge the Haka - Junior World Championship 2009
While most of the players taking part are inexperienced youngsters who are getting their first taste of international competition, there are some who have already taken the leap into professional rugby.
World Series Sevens, Guinness Premiership, and Super 14 players are all represented at the tournament, adding to the interest levels and the quality of play.
Last years champions New Zealand took on Ireland at the Mizuho Rugby Ground in Nagoya, but from the start Ireland showed that they were not to be intimidated by one of the most consistently powerful junior sides around.
As is commonplace these days, Ireland challenged the Haka, but perhaps went a bit overboard as they were practically standing on the players before it was over.
They were out to make a point, and they did just that as they match was confrontational and competitive, but they were no match for the might of the Baby Blacks, who won 17-0.
Did the young Irishmen take things a bit too far? Was Zac Guildford out of line for lashing out at the end? Or was it all perfectly fine and just another part of rugby theatre? We're keen to hear what you think.
Time: 02:22
Posted at 3:55 pm | 200 comments
|
|
Viewing 200 comments
Anonymous June 12, 2009 12:38 am

opfazonk June 12, 2009 12:42 am

the ABs were beaten many times and won their last world cup more than 20 years ago...
so what advantage are you talking about?
jamestheconvict June 12, 2009 12:48 am

Kiwi1979 June 12, 2009 12:52 am

Anonymous June 12, 2009 12:53 am

Anonymous June 12, 2009 1:00 am

Anonymous June 12, 2009 1:06 am

Anonymous June 12, 2009 1:12 am

No one moans about the Island countries doing their war dances cuz they aren't the All Blacks and they don't dominate rugby (outside the world cup where they seem to choke - although last time they got robbed by Barnes).
TheRealSlimShady June 12, 2009 1:17 am

number7 June 12, 2009 1:18 am

Anonymous June 12, 2009 1:23 am

The Haka represents the unification of the Pakeha and the Maori and is also a great and proud rugby traidtion, which any true rugby fan would respect, even venerate.
At a guess, your a fly-by-night fan, who's jumped on board the rugby bandwagon since the Irish got a half decent team (half decent, cuz in over 100 years of rugby they've yet to beat NZ - truly an inditment on their rugby team).
The AUssie and Saffers (who are the only sides in the world to consistently beat the All Blacks) never disrespect the haka, or even let it bother them.
They just focus on the rugby game to be played, and try to, you know, beat the kiwis at the game of rugby they are playing.
Although I guess if you got your arse cnsistently handed to you on a plate for over 100 years of rugby, you'd start focussing on irrelevant detals like the haka, to draw attention away from the terrible, shameful record of a century of abject defeat.
In this game thew Irish couldn't score a single point, so what good did their petulent little challenge acually do them?
Learn how to play world-class rugby, then people will worry about whether or not you like the haka.
Anonymous June 12, 2009 1:26 am

it has a place in rugby.
it should be openly disrespected by opposing teams as a multi cultural answer to its very nature..or else it has no place in international rugby..
Daylo June 12, 2009 1:28 am

What is the point of June 12, 2009 1:40 am

wolonel June 12, 2009 1:41 am

Ryan June 12, 2009 1:57 am

If they didn't do that, as far as I'm concerned anything responce goes....
I say its about time a team bends over and just moons the allblacks half way through the haka!
Anonymous June 12, 2009 2:05 am

What are you smoking?
They fought the English for 100 years, it's called the Maori Wars,you ingorant bastard.
In fact, they are probably the only native culture to suceed in defeating the British, who never overcame them and had to sign a eace treaty ceading King's Country on the North Island tothe Maori people as part of the peace deal.
Learn your history or keep your ignorant gob shut.
wolonel June 12, 2009 2:34 am

anonymous a post or two below seems to think that i've said that maori rebellion is akin to the british empire's dominance over the celtic nations, when clearly i've stated that countries such as ireland and wales admire the maori for their stance against the british(english) in rugby and out of rugby..unfortunately in when i was in new zealand in met many people who had little regard for any language let alone english..i can't speak to you in irish or the other languages i speak(german,spanish,swedish)..but i can tell you now that a swift word in the ear is better than any haka, but is not allowed in rugby so sit down
robert June 12, 2009 2:43 am

In fact Nonu was widely criticised by many NZers including Maori elders who said his attitude was wrong. Like many other things in life there are a lot of different viewpoints on the haka.
As a NZer I enjoy the theatre of the haka and also appreciate its tradition as a ritual, but I do think there is a danger of some NZ teams and their oppositions taking it too seriously. The overly nationalistic cultural preciousness that seems to be creeping in is off-putting for me personally and a lot of other people feel the same way. I don't think that we need to go back to the old days of a few blokes half-heartedly waiving their arms around while the opposition kicks the ball about in the background, but let's not get too carried away with all this warrior mystique. When one of the posters on here defends the haka and then refers to other Island traditions as "cultural dancing crap" then you know some people just aren't thinking this through.
In the end it's about a game of rugby.
Anonymous June 12, 2009 2:45 am

Village Lions NY June 12, 2009 2:48 am

Fair play to the Irish lads, standing up to this pretentious Broadway dance number. The haka is a tired little spectacle.
Anonymous June 12, 2009 3:00 am

And it'd be a sad day for rugby if it was gotten rid of, because of the pathetic whinging of a bunch of poms and Irish with their knickers in a twist.
wolonel June 12, 2009 3:09 am

keithxv June 12, 2009 3:31 am

granite June 12, 2009 3:49 am

The only problem with other teams responding, is what are they going to respond with? Waltzing matilda just isn't going to cut it for the wallabies.
I would LOVE to see other teams RESPOND to the haka, but I cringe every time I see teams do something to impede the haka (e.g. getting in their way, singing over the top). Wales last year was EXCELLENT. They stood up to them and didn't move during the haka or afterwards. One commentator said: It was fantastic. It was like they were saying "this is OUR turf, you have to back off first and get out of OUR way."
I paraphrase a little, but you get the jist. BUT THEY DIDN'T DO ANYTHING TO DETRACT FROM THE HAKA. That was the best bit.
Anonymous June 12, 2009 3:57 am

Personally, I think teams let it get into their heads too much.
Australia (who consistently beat the kiwis) just stand there and watch and do't let it bother them.
Then they go out and play rugby realy well.
keithxv June 12, 2009 4:02 am

Didn't the Irish lse 17-0?
So I guess the kiwis made this Irish team their bitches.
Shove someone who's done nothing but stand in your face next time you kiwi prick
Anonymous June 12, 2009 4:28 am

This whole haka thing has been blown way out of proportion. Yes it's a tradition which I love, but there's nothing wrong with responding to it. It's not like New Zealand has a monopoly on pre-game antics.
Anonymous June 12, 2009 4:42 am

Zacaria June 12, 2009 5:23 am

why cant every rugby nation have there own little festive dance before a game, it would be like cheerleading but for yourself thats what the haka really is
Zacaria June 12, 2009 5:25 am

June 12, 2009 6:28 AM
loved that one!
Anonymous June 12, 2009 5:58 am

'Ungracious', never heard such a load of tripe in my entire life
Anonymous June 12, 2009 6:01 am

haka. It's fine. It's just all the pathetic girly complaining (almost exclusivley from poms and irish - way to reinforce the stereotype of whinging girls from the UK and Ireland)from you lot that is annoying.
Stop your moaning.
Anonymous June 12, 2009 6:51 am

Anonymous June 12, 2009 7:24 am

let the ABs do the haka, let teams face it in what ever way they want, let there be a good game of rugby.
End.
Simon June 12, 2009 7:25 am

Human nature I guess, only hear what you wanna hear.
Anonymous June 12, 2009 7:29 am

haka. It's fine. It's just all the pathetic girly complaining (almost exclusivley from poms and irish - way to reinforce the stereotype of whinging girls from the UK and Ireland)from you lot that is annoying.
Stop your moaning" - Anonymous
Mate you're a tool, Irish people enjoy the haka, the spectacle between the two teams like the u20s is what draws people to rugby. You're trying to stereotype Brits and Irish as sooks, mate you're a typical kiwi wanker, full of arrogance and bullshit, where are all your world cups for how good you are? Oh yeah I forgot you've had barren spell for what... 20 years?
Anonymous June 12, 2009 7:38 am

paddy the slap June 12, 2009 7:50 am

Anonymous June 12, 2009 7:59 am

Anonymous June 12, 2009 8:01 am

There's a half way line on the pitch, use it. Pre game, do want you want on your own half but don't cross the line. Problem solved.
The Irish marched so close the Blacks couldn't finish properly, seems they paid a fitting price for it though.
Anonymous June 12, 2009 8:16 am

Flooz June 12, 2009 8:25 am

The fact is that some teams miss the real sense of haka.
Personnally i loved wales "static" answer or the "march" of France during the RWC 2007, bacause they do it for themselves and with respect.
Here, it's just some young irritating fools..
Anonymous June 12, 2009 8:38 am

Well done Ireland u-20s
Anonymous June 12, 2009 8:55 am

Anonymous June 12, 2009 9:26 am

But I doubt the Ireland U20s have ever come out triumphant against the Baby Blacks. And they were going out there pumping themselves up as the Baby Blacks did, in hope there was a chance to beat NZ before their senior team does.
Anonymous June 12, 2009 9:32 am

Anonymous June 12, 2009 9:36 am

Bradders June 12, 2009 9:42 am

I think that may be what made the Kiwi's blood boil.
The Haka is a part of rugby history. Great to watch as a fan.
Not as good as seeing Chabal up against the Haka!
Anonymous June 12, 2009 10:11 am

it is an unfair advantage and i believe teams can do what they want aslong as they dont interfere with it.
Tanora June 12, 2009 10:14 am

1) The haka is bullshit. At best its an unfair chance to intimidate the opposition, at worst (and more likely) its a nicely marketable little showpiece, perfect for the likes of Adidas to latch on to.
2) I watch the full 80 minutes of 30 to 35 rugby matches a year and maybe two of those have a haka at the start. It makes shit-all difference to me and almost never enhances the match. One notable exception was last November when the NZ players on the Munster squad responded with their own haka, but that was enjoyable because I thought they were really giving two fingers back at the NZ team.
3) The pretentiousness surrounding the haka makes me want to throw up. Im pretty sure the SA team could muster some indigenous dance or show, Australia probably could too, we Irish could say Mass or drink ourselves into a stupor, but none of these countries do. Why NZ and the South Pacific nations get special dispensation to perform a haka is beyond me. But any nation can do whatever they want before a match, I hear you wail. Thats probably true, but realistically that is never going to happen.
4) Any value the haka once had is long gone. Who here knew that the haka is also performed by NZs mens hockey team? It is, Ive seen it, and its embarrassing.
5) While a teams reaction to the haka may have little bearing on the outcome of the match, saying that standing up to it never pays dividends is incorrect. See: France NZ haka WC2007.
Im sick of the haka, NZ (public and players, Nonu) preciousness about it and the reverence it is treated with in rugby circles. Id still watch and play rugby if there was no haka.
Duncan June 12, 2009 10:26 am

Anonymous June 12, 2009 10:28 am

Anonymous June 12, 2009 10:47 am

dr June 12, 2009 11:10 am

Im pretty sure it was largely the french...and i dont think it involved much fighting...mostly just dieing! Sounds harsh but the Europeans had guns and the Moaris just had sticks. It was a horrendous period of history.
Anonymous June 12, 2009 11:13 am

Anonymous June 12, 2009 11:22 am

However this namby pambering around it that standing up to it is not being respectful is complete rubbish, a challenge to it should be allowed. However the Irish looked like absolute plonkers compared to the welsh challenge to it.
Anonymous June 12, 2009 11:24 am

Anonymous June 12, 2009 11:29 am

Having a load of Samoans, tongans and Fijians doing it seems a bit pointless.
Remeber when they had a hissy fit when wales wanted to reply to it with their anthem and they did it in the changing rooms. What gives them the right? nothing does
Anonymous June 12, 2009 11:30 am

Armstrong June 12, 2009 11:34 am

Best way to shut them up.
And what?
leanbeef June 12, 2009 11:39 am

2 Rugby traditions NOT worth keeping.
Why should the home nations and the oirish get to join forces and play happy families on tour every 4 years....screw them. Bury the tradition - they get spanked every time anyway and waste a shetload of money in the process.
Oiks!
Luther June 12, 2009 12:18 pm

The boys should focus on improving their skills to make the step up rather than trying to look like big shots.
themull June 12, 2009 12:19 pm

But the opposition is not allowed to walk infront of then no?
What were the irish lads taking away their fresh breathing air or something?
So bassically they are allowed to threathen us with a violent war dance but we cannot walk towards them? yea that makes sense...
What Irish teams should do is walk up as far as the half way line and sing out the fields of Athenry from the top of their voices...But I suppose that would be disrespectful too ....
Brick Shithouse June 12, 2009 12:28 pm

Ireland did lose 17-0 yeh, but if you saw the match it was 3-0 until the 60th minute, and NZ maturity showed through. Guilford plays pro, the Irish lads are in college!!
The haka is a bunch of set movements, so is forming a wedge and ending right-up on the Kiwis shoe-laces, 6 of one half dozen of the other.
Commentators sounded English to me?
And thatt Irish prop in the picture on the far left went to my old school!
Anonymous June 12, 2009 12:34 pm

Herbie
What is the point of June 12, 2009 12:35 pm

Anonymous June 12, 2009 12:38 pm

teams should be allowed reply however they want to
number7 June 12, 2009 12:43 pm

and over here in ireland we love the feckin haka and since the munster game where we responded last year there have been a spate of teams doing ever increasing and more agressive means of standing up to it
Alain June 12, 2009 12:50 pm

Richard June 12, 2009 12:52 pm

Anonymous June 12, 2009 12:55 pm

How is this for ignorant :
"Im pretty sure it was largely the french...and i dont think it involved much fighting...mostly just dieing! Sounds harsh but the Europeans had guns and the Moaris just had sticks. It was a horrendous period of history."
The French? In NZ? They've never been there.
Not much fighting? Do you know what a Pa is? How the British lost almost evrey major set piece battle of the maori wars?
And did you know that the Maori had been trading for firearms for about a century when the British declared war on them?
That after decades of brutal, scroched earth warfare and the death of thousands the British were forced to declare a peace treaty with the Maori? That they ceded King's Country to them, as part of the terms of peace?
Or are you just an ignorant bastard who shouldn't open his ignorant mouth?
number7 June 12, 2009 12:57 pm

Anonymous June 12, 2009 12:57 pm

The reason they win is that they are fucking good at rugby.
They are better than you softies in the NH and always will be.
The haka has nothing to do with it.
When you learn how to play rugby, you can critisize them. Until then shut up and apreciate a great tradition.
And I aint even a kiwi.
DeutscheWing June 12, 2009 1:01 pm

abolish the haka and ban that commentator
Anonymous June 12, 2009 1:05 pm

Anonymous June 12, 2009 1:09 pm

the same as scotland with the pipers...wales with the singers...only to build up the atmosphere for the start of the match..
Anonymous June 12, 2009 1:13 pm

Fair enough to stand up to the Haka, but at least be able to back it up.
ROFLMAO!
PS - I'm not a Kiwi.
Cheech June 12, 2009 1:13 pm

I like seeing the haka. I wouldn't want them to stop it, but opponents should be able to respond how they see fit. Granted I do think that the Irish U20's made themselves look like tits. However its there right to do that as a response.
Anonymous June 12, 2009 1:16 pm

Anonymous June 12, 2009 1:19 pm

Although, the Boks at least have the good grace not to walk into the Haka.
number7 June 12, 2009 1:25 pm

Anonymous June 12, 2009 1:29 pm

You can walk up to it, stand your ground, do a fuckin jig, it doesn't matter, cuz all anyone's gonna remember is that you lost the bloody game.
Anonymous June 12, 2009 1:30 pm

Anonymous June 12, 2009 1:35 pm

How about focusing on getting better skills at rugby?
Or just keep losing, either way.
What is the point of June 12, 2009 1:35 pm

Anonymous June 12, 2009 1:38 pm

Joe June 12, 2009 1:40 pm

FattyCuts June 12, 2009 1:44 pm

What only Zac Guildford? One player out of an entire squad? Nice comeback muppet. He is the only survivor from last years World Champion U20 team - the Irish and all the Six Nations teams have played together already in their own competition so they're already familiar with each other and should have gelled enough to beat an inexperienced NZ team 99.9% playing together in a tournament for the first time.
Its all stacked against the kiwis yet they still donut the "mighty" irish ROFLMAO
F*kn jokers haha
Anonymous June 12, 2009 1:45 pm

Let me re-phrase, The Springboks were the first team to walk towards the Haka, that is, the first team that could actually back up the challenge. Unlike the "home" Unions and the B&I Lions. What was it again? Oh! 3-0 to the ABs in 2005.
ROFLMAO!
Anonymous June 12, 2009 1:51 pm

David June 12, 2009 1:54 pm

Ammo June 12, 2009 1:55 pm

The commentators over reacted at the end. Why shouldn't the Irish guys advance on the haka? As has been said, why is it almost universally accepted that teams just stand there and accept it? Possibly the Irish lads messed up a photo op for the commentator.
As for the backlash? IT didn't really materialise did it? It's not as if the Irish guys were annihilated by the baby blacks.
Commentators, get over yourselves.
Anonymous June 12, 2009 1:57 pm

Anonymous June 12, 2009 1:57 pm

That's a punishing scoreline.
To not score a single point, jesus christ, if that's not getting your arse kicked, what is? negative points?
Anonymous June 12, 2009 1:58 pm

Cheis June 12, 2009 2:01 pm

glad to see they got smacked with 17-0!!
Anonymous June 12, 2009 2:04 pm

Anonymous June 12, 2009 2:05 pm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GtqesudKxSA
p.s. everyone who says "p.s. i'm not a kiwi" after big upping them clearly is because everyone else in the world thinks they're dicks.
boom.
Anonymous June 12, 2009 2:09 pm

The Irish have never, ever beaten the kiwis. Ever.
In over 100 years.
So shut the fuck up.
PS Im not a kiwi
Anonymous June 12, 2009 2:12 pm

P.S; im irish
Anonymous June 12, 2009 2:13 pm

Anonymous June 12, 2009 2:15 pm

Anonymous June 12, 2009 2:16 pm

STFU
number7 June 12, 2009 2:18 pm

Let me re-phrase, The Springboks were the first team to walk towards the Haka, that is, the first team that could actually back up the challenge. Unlike the "home" Unions and the B&I Lions. What was it again? Oh! 3-0 to the ABs in 2005.
ROFLMAO!
to the nonamoaus who posted that..wille anderson was a better player and man that you will ever be so stop posting behind a anonamous and stick a name behind that bullshit of yours
Sean Kelly June 12, 2009 2:25 pm

Banyon June 12, 2009 2:27 pm

It's amusing that New Zealand has a wardance, but is nowhere to be seen during wars.
The sheer historical ignorance of this statement is unbelievable and obscene. Since its founding New Zealanders have served with great distinction and unfortunately huge loss of lives in many conflicts including both World Wars, and only a brainless fool could make such a statement.
thebull3 June 12, 2009 2:33 pm

Keith June 12, 2009 2:35 pm

The haka is a challenge afterall. So naturally a team dont just stand there and take it. Defeats the purpose of the haka if the challenge is not taken!
It would be worse and insulting if a team were to turn their back on the haka for example.
Commentator is clearly a moron for what he said about the challenge!
Anonymous June 12, 2009 2:40 pm

Waldo June 12, 2009 3:32 pm

RS June 12, 2009 3:33 pm

felix June 12, 2009 3:36 pm

NZ have 29000. Not that different and they still get mocked every time. I'm kiwi and i love the haka. i also don't really care what other teams do in response.
the bottom line is... 17-0. thanks for coming paddy now go back to banging on about how amazing brian o'driscol is - not that it's ever done you any good.
btw - paul o'connell is garbage.
Anonymous June 12, 2009 3:45 pm

I heard from a fd who's been to NZ that a traditional Haka was supposed to be right in your face anyway
humper June 12, 2009 4:10 pm

Anonymous June 12, 2009 4:22 pm

they treat that haka like a baby.
fair enough thats the wat use to they psyche themselves up,but why cant ireland do the same by challenging it?
i love the haka in rugby,dont get me wrong,but let teams do what they want while the all blacks are doing it-be it watching it challenging it,or indeed ignoring it.
Abbyno7 June 12, 2009 4:23 pm

One of the best challenges to the haka ever and both sides were face to face. The same goes for the RL WC final last year. The Aussies were practically touching the Kiwis. Was great theatre.
Ironically the commentator saying that Ireland were being 'ungracious' etc. isn't a Kiwi. That much is obvious from his accent.
I think you should be allowed to challenge the haka. Buck Shelford in 1989 thought Willie Anderson's challenge to the haka was brilliant. He loved it. Nonu was the one acting precious last year. Very childish reaction. It is a war dance and rugby is often compared to being a warzone out on the field. It makes sense to stand up to it. I think the Welsh in 08 and the French in 2007 probably got it right.
Wales just stood there and said 'this is our ground we're not moving till you do'.
France said 'if you want to intimidate us we're going to be right in your faces. Let's see how you guys react'
Cheesekiwi June 12, 2009 4:42 pm

Idiot, do you have any clue how many Kiwi's died fighting for freedom in both world wars? If it weren't for the ANZAC's you'd maybe not even be living in (reasonable) peace.
''People go on about ireland never hav beaten NZ in rugby,yet they dont no anythin.Rugby is only the 5th biggest sport in ireland,behind gaelic fooball,hurling,soccer and even boxing,while the only new zealand can do is play rugby.''
Yes, rugby is New Zealands most prominent sport but the only thing we can do? Rugby League, Sailing, Hockey, Cricket, we're even most likely going to the next soccer world cup so I don't think it's all we can do...
By the way, I do think teams should be able to stand up against the haka, but keep it rational. The Welsh response was probably the best. Like Buck Shelford said: Teams should be able to stand up against the haka.
Also, Zac, think bro, why would you have to push him. Just smash him later in the game.
And, woohoo, well done Baby Blacks, can't wait till these players become All Blacks.
Go Kiwi!
JZ June 12, 2009 4:46 pm

joeblack June 12, 2009 5:31 pm

Anonymous June 12, 2009 5:32 pm

Anonymous June 12, 2009 5:42 pm

capt. america June 12, 2009 5:54 pm

"guys, we're going to throw down the gauntlet so if you could just form a line and watch we'd appreciate it..."
the only agreed condition must be that teams stay in their own halves.
in the future, i would recommend that catholic countries kneel and pray. eyes closed and silent. and then put the opposition to the sword (so to speak).
just like the good ol days of the crusades.
Hoss June 12, 2009 6:11 pm

Anonymous June 12, 2009 6:47 pm

Anonymous June 12, 2009 7:19 pm

Anonymous June 12, 2009 7:31 pm

Anonymous June 12, 2009 7:37 pm

The fact is that some teams miss the real sense of haka.
Personnally i loved wales "static" answer or the "march" of France during the RWC 2007, bacause they do it for themselves and with respect.
Here, it's just some young irritating fools.."
EXACTLY.
The French and the Welsh got it right. Here the Irish kids just looked like complete bellends. And they bricked it at the end of the Haka when a few players bucked up to them.
Just kids trying to immitate and looking like twats.
FrankyH June 12, 2009 7:45 pm

All i can say is echo the words on one of the other commenters:
The Aussie and Saffers (who are the only sides in the world to consistently beat the All Blacks) never disrespect the haka, or even let it bother them.
They just focus on the rugby game to be played, and try to, you know, beat the kiwis at the game of rugby they are playing.
It seems like the ones moaning for it to be done away with have no chance of ever beating them. Either that, or you're young and ignorant, and playing/watching rugby for the wrong reasons.
My opinion.
Also, apologies to the Scots in my comment at the start of this.. no offence was meant.. was just trying to make a point. I'm neither kiwi nor irish btw
Simon June 12, 2009 8:03 pm

1. The Haka
2. The National Anthems
3. Shaking hands with the royal beforehand
4. The B&I Lions
5. 99.9% of Referees
6. Swing Low Sweet Chariot
Any more to add to the list?
con bons June 12, 2009 8:09 pm

Anonymous June 12, 2009 8:10 pm

We can challenge u with a war dance but dont get to close this is our personal space.
Thats stupid, Irish did the rite thing. If the all blacks dont want ppl getting up in there faces do the haka in Dressing room.
Lets face in the all blacks just want ppl to bow down and cry cause anything else u do is offencive. BOD got spearded for being offending the haka even though thats what a tribe chiften told him to do.
gfhmon June 12, 2009 8:49 pm

I think it's acceptable to challenge the Haka but important not to disrespect it.
Ireland DID cross the line...to be exact the half way line and that was a step too far. But it did seem like it fired them up as their tackling was pretty ferocious..
The NZ goal kicker also missed a couple of early chances with penalties too so I reckon it probably did have an effect on their mindsets.
End result was 17-0 though which might seem like a lot but it could probably have been more.
semperfimamba June 12, 2009 8:55 pm

Silly provocation by the Paddies...and they got whooped..haha
Anonymous June 12, 2009 9:29 pm

CheckYoself June 12, 2009 9:36 pm

strange considering the MOST VIEWED video on "rugby" (search for it) on Youtube is the NZ Haka, not even a fuckin game of rugby. The next two most viewed are AGAIN the NZ haka.
NZ only started doing the haka again at the insistence of BRITISH crowds during the 70s.
Read a fucking book you little kids.
Anonymous June 12, 2009 9:50 pm

alex June 12, 2009 9:52 pm

Anonymous June 12, 2009 10:21 pm

having said that they talked a good fight and contonued to thrash wales
Patron June 12, 2009 10:58 pm

we have been through this! i like people standing up to the haka ,
the commentators are idiots!
why should we fear the all blacks, as a great irish player once said the only thing that makes the strong is the jersey, deep down they are men like everyone else
Anonymous June 12, 2009 11:37 pm

Also, why aren't the Irish given an alloted time to stand opposite them and say "we're going to kick your ass" start dancing and giving the opposition the fingers? Doesn't seem much different to the Haka to me.
steve June 12, 2009 11:56 pm

While it is great to see teams occationally confront the Haka, the autumn teasts for instance, and who could forget England hooker Richard Cockrills' once man offensive against the NZ war dance, if this behavior becomes common place we may witness the sad dissapearence of the Haka from international rugby.
Don't whine that it is an unfair advantage to the All Blacks just because they thought of it first.
The way to "stand up" to the Haka is best done within 80 minutes of rugby, beating the All Blacks and making their pre-match traditions irrelavent.
Anonymous June 13, 2009 12:10 am

The point is you look like football arses discussing if they should ban traditions or if they should contest or not rituals. Thats rugby, you should react as you must down there. Its all about that battle.
And thats why I love rugby.
danny June 13, 2009 12:31 am

Anonymous June 13, 2009 12:50 am

And the commentators are just plain boring, I wish Kearnsey was there :D
Ref June 13, 2009 1:03 am

Anonymous June 13, 2009 1:51 am

Anonymous June 13, 2009 2:17 am

Stop critising the Irish. Turning your back on them is bigger insult.
Anonymous June 13, 2009 2:31 am

It's fine. Advance or whatever.
Everyone comments on Nonu, but his viewpoint (and that's all it was, his opinion) was the exception. Most of the team and most of the supporters loved what Wales did, it added to the occasion.
The thing is though, it really doesn't matter what you do to the Haka if you THEN LOSE THE GAME!
No one cares, cuz you've still lost.
Australia and South Africa respect the haka.
They don't let it intimidate them, simple as that. Frankly if you allow the haka to intimidate you, giving the All-Blacks an advantage, YOU SHOULDN'T BE PLAYING RUGBY!
The Aussies and Saffers just go out and play the game, and often win. That way no one gives a stuff about the haka, all anyone cares about is you've won the game.
The problem with the Irish, is they've never won. All this complaining is just throwing your toys out of the pram, cuz you can't win the bloody rugby game. How about focusing on producing a team that CAN SCORE A SINGLE BLOODY POINT?
Focus on the rugby and the haka will become irrelevant.
Or just keep losing, and moaning about the haka.
Anonymous June 13, 2009 5:28 am

I do, however reckon that no.11's push in the end was uncalled for.
JimmyJam June 13, 2009 8:42 am

Challenging is certainly acceptable, but they cant be allowed the touch them or disrupt it in the way that they cant even move their arms or do the actual thing.
Either you place a serious complaint about it with the IRB prematch, or you accept it and dont disrupt it physically. Again though, challenging is perfectly fine.. just dont get in their space - that's disrespectful.
Anonymous June 13, 2009 9:24 am

As a rugby player i respect the blacks rite to Haka , But belive the irish did the rite thing challenging it.
It DOES give you and advantage , and if the irish had won they would be being praised instead of insulted.
I think it was good on you lads
Jake mandrake
Anonymous June 13, 2009 11:17 am

The challenge is being set down and the Irish are simply accepting it
Anonymous June 13, 2009 11:41 am

Anonymous June 13, 2009 11:51 am

no9 June 13, 2009 2:46 pm

Anonymous June 13, 2009 2:58 pm

Anonymous June 13, 2009 3:01 pm

Anonymous June 13, 2009 3:54 pm

The guy having a whinge is English, you idiots!
Stubby June 13, 2009 4:10 pm

Westerner June 13, 2009 4:30 pm

Ireland has a small player pool and are currently dominating the Northern hemisphere even though its not near our countrys top sport, hats off to the lads they are doing us proud on all accounts.
17 - 0 final score in that game, and from what ive heard, the ABs racked up score while an Irish lad was in the bin (full credit and all it was his own wrongdoing). The fact that NZ will go on to whip everyone else certainly gives credit to the Irish to take on a strong NZ outfit.
Was looking for a link for the 70's haka as mentioned in earlier posts, but found this dinger instead. . .
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ppf55IO1tw
I dont want a battle of arrogance so I will leave the NH vs SH arguement out of it and end it here.
View Video
gongshow June 13, 2009 9:09 pm

brucey09 June 13, 2009 11:57 pm

....it is pretty irrelevant to mention that NZ have been such a consistent force in world rugby - it doesnt matter... frankly if Georgia had always had started their games by having a shot of vodka on the 1/2 way line and toasting the oppostition then I would say we should have it.... like it or lump it, it is tradition, and our game is all the better for its traditions and the melting pot of its cultures.
I like the Haka... though I am a bit bored of the soap opera surrounding it now - every team now seems to need to do something, but who cares what the Irish did - thats not disrespecting it, thats saying- great bring it on. Just like Willie Anderson in 1989 and Buck Shelford loved it!
At least they didnt do a Campo and go and kick a ball about down their end!
Perhaps they encroached the NZ half a bit far.. but they are young lads, the fella shoving the Irish lad reminds you that... never just get on with it!
Patron June 14, 2009 12:01 am

there is nothing wrong with standing up to the haka, the ozzies were a bit rude tho and the welsh incident was wrong,
so does Munsters haka in november mean that was wrong to stand up to the all blacks, or tonga with their haka etc
What is the point of June 14, 2009 12:21 am

Anonymous June 14, 2009 4:42 am

Nigel Starmer-Smith (usually excellent) has had a shocker on the commentating.
cardiffdevil June 14, 2009 9:39 am

Anonymous June 14, 2009 11:40 am

prior to this game the least any1 had ever lost to new zealand in the under 20's world cup was by 25points!!
Shane June 14, 2009 6:32 pm

jrjacko June 14, 2009 7:26 pm

Anonymous June 14, 2009 10:03 pm

Anonymous June 15, 2009 1:00 am

Anonymous June 15, 2009 3:26 am

Anonymous June 15, 2009 5:37 am

Fly by night fans and whinging poms onject to it. What a surprise.
Rich June 15, 2009 8:34 am

i think all teams should do it.the crowd enjoyed it, you can hear the cheer when the Irish walked up nose to nose.
if the Kiwis can be confrontational with a war dance, then surely the other side is allowed the same priviledge.
Bob June 15, 2009 9:07 am

yes, the AB's won, 17-0
Anonymous June 15, 2009 5:45 pm

I agree with a lot of what has been said here...when you stand up to the Haka they get pissed cause you're being 'disrespectful' or 'confrontational'. Meanwhile when you ignore it, you are deemed as classless and disrespectful once again.
The Irish did get a little close, but the Kiwis caused the major confrontation in the end.
Anonymous June 15, 2009 7:11 pm

The commentator is Nigel Starmer-Smith (he's English), one of the most experienced commentators, if not the most, in world rugby and has incredible knowledge. He commentates on 7s, top 14, rugby around the world. He knows what the haka means and how it should be respected. Ireland were just immature a bit there.
Fine, stand at the line like france did against the AB's in the WC quarter final, but don't go past the half-way line. That's just total disrespect.
Anonymous June 16, 2009 12:39 am

It may have been good to watch back in the day when test matches against the all blacks were few and far between, but now, with the all blacks playing so many tests (the amount of games in the tri nations is a joke)
Its come to the point where if you face up to the haka and accept the callenge its 'disrespectful' but if you ignore it David Campese style its also classed as disrespectful, its a no win situation for opposition teams.
The all blacks showed their petulance and true colours when doing the haka behind closed doors in the millennium stadium a few years back.
This is not against their playing as it is obvious they are highly successful (removing world cups from the equasion) i am making a point about little need for the haka in the modern game. (barring one in a blue moon performances)
Anonymous June 16, 2009 12:40 am

It may have been good to watch back in the day when test matches against the all blacks were few and far between, but now, with the all blacks playing so many tests (the amount of games in the tri nations is a joke)
Its come to the point where if you face up to the haka and accept the callenge its 'disrespectful' but if you ignore it David Campese style its also classed as disrespectful, its a no win situation for opposition teams.
The all blacks showed their petulance and true colours when doing the haka behind closed doors in the millennium stadium a few years back.
This is not against their playing as it is obvious they are highly successful (removing world cups from the equasion) i am making a point about little need for the haka in the modern game. (barring one in a blue moon performances)
Anonymous June 16, 2009 12:41 am

It may have been good to watch back in the day when test matches against the all blacks were few and far between, but now, with the all blacks playing so many tests (the amount of games in the tri nations is a joke)
Its come to the point where if you face up to the haka and accept the callenge its 'disrespectful' but if you ignore it David Campese style its also classed as disrespectful, its a no win situation for opposition teams.
The all blacks showed their petulance and true colours when doing the haka behind closed doors in the millennium stadium a few years back.
This is not against their playing as it is obvious they are highly successful (removing world cups from the equasion) i am making a point about little need for the haka in the modern game. (barring one in a blue moon performances)
Anonymous June 16, 2009 6:49 am

No one really cares if the Irish stand up to it, it just makes them look like idiots if they then lose the game 17-0, as they did. Kind of pointless to be a big man before the game and then fail to score a single point.
But most people don't give a stuff what you do to the haka, do a jig or whatever, who cares. I saw a rugby league game where the cook islands marched right up to it and there ended up being a huge punch up. I thought it was great, but that's just my opinion.
At the end of the day it doesn't really matter. If you can;t win no one cares whether you like the haka.
The funny thing is that when a team beats the All Blacks, suddenly no on cares about the haka.
All anyone can talk about at the moment is how well the French played, no one gives a stuff about tha haka.
Anonymous June 16, 2009 7:40 pm

John Paul June 16, 2009 8:23 pm

Enda June 16, 2009 10:51 pm

Anonymous June 17, 2009 1:51 am

you lot have a huge chip on your shoulders or something.
The kiwis aren't the ones complaining here, as usual it's bunch of whinging poms and Irish, you lot just aren't happy unless your moaning about something.
Firstly, endo, the world cup was awarded to NZ by the IRB, you nonce, do you think they just nicked it? I mean is your head screwed on right?
Secondly, it's funny how it's only the teams who consistently lose to the All Blacks who bitch and moan about the haka.
The Aussies and Saffers don't care, they just watch it and then go out and play rugby. Cuz it does't bother them it's not an advantage. And they win against NZ quite alot, usually once or twice a year each.
If it's an advantage, it's cuz your rugby players are piss weak and get scared by a few guys doing a bit of a dance before the game.
Frnakly, I doubt if any profesional rugby players a psycologically affected by it, and if theyare, they shouldn't be playing rugby.
If NZ weren't any good no one would give a stuff, just as no one complains about Tonga, Fiji or Samoa doing their war dances.
It's just sour grapes, and it's petulent.
And I'm not from NZ.
DDC June 17, 2009 9:11 am

The previous year, Ireland lost to the AB's by 65-13 (approx), similer to the year before and the year before that... etc.
Ireland are the first side to keep the Baby Blacks to a score as low as 17 in years! Ok they didn't score, but they put up a hell of a defensive performance.
They ensured that the AB's were the only side to top their pool not to have gotton bonus points from all their games.
Well done Ireland.
Stood up, and challenged the Haka, and came out unscathed.
Anonymous June 17, 2009 11:30 pm

As an Aussie, if my team lost 17-0 to the kiwis, I'd think it was disgraceful.
ollie October 23, 2009 10:01 am

dr August 10, 2010 2:43 pm

In fact, they are probably the only native culture to suceed in defeating the British, who never overcame them and had to sign a eace treaty ceading King's Country on the North Island tothe Maori people as part of the peace deal.
Learn your history or keep your ignorant gob shut."
Mate! The "Maori Wars" or NZ land wars only lasted 27 years and the "rebels" lost and had their last confiscated. Eventually the crown agreed it had breached the Treaty of Waitangi and negotiated a settlement but the historical ownership of NZ is still a major today. I dont know where you learnt your history ... I'm not even from NZ!















Commenting as Guest | Register or Login