Saturday, August 01, 2009
Steyn boots Boks to another win over All Blacks
On a day when Jean De Villiers and Bryan Habana both notched up their 50th Test cap, it was John Smit who probably had the most memorable experience, as he broke the record for the most capped Test captain ever.
He overtook George Gregan and Will Carling with his record 60th cap as captain.
Flyhalf on the day Steyn put in another quality performance as he kicked sublimely to help clinch another team milestone, this time the first time since 1976 that a South African side have beaten the All Blacks in a series.
He scored a try, kicked the conversion, and then kicked 8 penalties, missing his ninth attempt on fulltime. The 31 points were the most points ever by a player against the All Blacks. He also got the record for the most points in a Tri Nations match, eclipsing the 29 set by Andrew Mehrtens.
He was humble post match when asked about the performance.
"We were ready for the rain and expected the win to blow, so that wasnt really a problem. I was a bit disappointed to miss that last kick but happy with the rest of them," he said.
"A lot of credit has to go to the forwards, though. Any No 10 would love to be in a side like this."
New Zealand showed flashes of brilliance at times with their incredible counter-attacking prowess, but their error rate was high and they lacked precision and composure, which cost them dearly.
South Africa now sit firmly on top of the table, with another home match to come, before travelling overseas. They face the Wallabies in Cape Town next week.
Time: 06:44
Posted at 7:40 pm | 108 comments
|
|
Viewing 108 comments
ArranR August 01, 2009 6:32 pm

goodNumber10 August 01, 2009 7:07 pm

Good Saffer side this, Brussow was immense, totally outplayed McCaw who doesn't look fit imo.
Shaft August 01, 2009 7:15 pm

Nice to see him getting pinged often though. :)
Boks are looking great.
italian, scottish an August 01, 2009 7:17 pm

bigox August 01, 2009 7:31 pm

Basics done with world class precision.
Anonymous August 01, 2009 7:35 pm

Anonymous August 01, 2009 7:40 pm

Anonymous August 01, 2009 7:47 pm

B August 01, 2009 7:58 pm

2nd NEW ZEALAND 90.10
3rd AUSTRALIA 86.06
4th IRELAND 83.27
InsideShoulder August 01, 2009 8:27 pm

italian, scottish an August 01, 2009 8:47 pm

Anonymous August 01, 2009 9:18 pm

Huh!! the 3rd August 01, 2009 9:26 pm

Secondly, after my tirade against refs, another great reffing preformance from Nigel 'the only gayee in the vill - age' Owens, fair dues to him for coming out in a very physical, testostrone fuelled sport, very few who would. For those who don't know the show Little Britain, don't accuse me of homophobia, just joking.
Thirdly, i think the anger over Burger's short ban are now null and void, I don't think he's gonna get a game again this year.
Brussow was a gaint again. Correct me if I'm wrong SA fans, but Brussow wasn't even in the orginal squad to face the Lions. Only for Burger's injury before 1st test. What a find. To give McCaw a taste of his own meds not once but twice is incredible. The best thing about him is the fact he doesn't fit into the trad SA flanker mould, ie, 6' 4", 19.5 stone and 100m in 10.5secs, he's an out and out grounghog. Thats the beauty of Rugby Union, a position for all shapes and sizes. Openside seems a lost art form as more teams choose ball carrying 7s, although nothing wrong with that. Neil Back, McCaw, George Smith, Waugh, Dusattoir, and now Brussow.
Anonymous August 01, 2009 9:28 pm

in my opinion...
Huh!! the 3rd August 01, 2009 9:40 pm

Anonymous August 01, 2009 10:02 pm

Anonymous August 01, 2009 10:08 pm

Anonymous August 01, 2009 10:14 pm

Anonymous August 01, 2009 10:37 pm

Anonymous August 01, 2009 10:58 pm

Anonymous August 01, 2009 10:58 pm

Even if the Boks didn't score a try, they'd still win 24-19
Anonymous August 01, 2009 11:01 pm

Anonymous August 01, 2009 11:03 pm

caucau's no.1 fan August 01, 2009 11:07 pm

Ted August 01, 2009 11:45 pm

Anyway, I say this not to slag off the Boks, or indeed anyone, but rather to point out that most fans want their teams to win more than they want their teams to play 'attractive' rugby. That lots of other fans are slagging off the style of the Boks rugby at the moment probably does not concern SA fans one little bit. When England were No. 1 (which seems about three hundred years ago now) I didn't give a damn if all the other nations hated their style of play.
What's more, beauty is in the eye of the beholder, 'attractive' rugby to some is hideous to others.
nick j August 01, 2009 11:56 pm

secondly, the try the boks scored - was donald even thinking abou trying a tackle? he just stood and watched morne jog past him. other than as a kicker hes been poor throughout his career above a super14 level.
to be fair to NZ though, kano's sin-binning was unfair and the penalty just before HT that gave SA 3 points was wrong. rococoko didnt connect with his foot so there was no offside. just a knock-on and half-time. without those 2, who knows?
Kearney for tests August 02, 2009 12:26 am

Anonymous August 02, 2009 1:02 am

Anonymous August 02, 2009 1:03 am

Jon August 02, 2009 1:11 am

What's his problem, is he always so annoying and pedantic?
Cuz I'd actually rather see the the players win the game with their rugby, then with the ref's sometimes quite bizzare interpretations.
I agree that we need mor SH refs for the 3-nations, they let the game get played, unlike the NH refs, who seem to want the focus to be on their reffing performance.
Having said that, I'm not knocking the Boks, they won fair and square, they are the better team.
Just the ref, what a knob head.
Anonymous August 02, 2009 1:13 am

Anonymous August 02, 2009 1:13 am

-Dune
Anonymous August 02, 2009 1:21 am

Anonymous August 02, 2009 1:24 am

Phil3 August 02, 2009 2:47 am

Anonymous August 02, 2009 2:54 am

Anonymous August 02, 2009 4:28 am

Anonymous August 02, 2009 5:10 am

ArranR August 02, 2009 7:08 am

Fourie?
M. Steyn?
Botha?
I havn't watched the highlights so i'm not sure if it shows you sivivatu's runs.(I watched the whole game). I didn't realise how quick and strong he is, and his sidestep aswell is phenomal. I dont know how many defenders he beat after just his 2 immense runs, but it must be round about 6 or 7 which is unbelievable!
Sivivatu is a player to watch in this NZ side.
Brussow, Fourie and M.Steyn are ones to watch in the SA side. Especially Brussow.
I havn't really seen any players stand out in the AUS side, but 1 to always watch is Gituea.
peteNe August 02, 2009 7:51 am

Timothy August 02, 2009 8:13 am

Great day for SA rugby, all the haters are going to be hating for a while to come!
I'll be at the test next week against the wallabies, lets hope the weather is good, although I don't think it matters!
Bokke for the TriNations!!!
jorge August 02, 2009 8:31 am

sebastian August 02, 2009 10:10 am

henry should really make up his mind about the halfbacks
Anonymous August 02, 2009 10:19 am

world cup '11 final: bokke vs france
Anonymous August 02, 2009 11:09 am

Anonymous August 02, 2009 11:12 am

Anonymous August 02, 2009 11:14 am

Anonymous August 02, 2009 11:16 am

befuddled August 02, 2009 11:39 am

It's quite obvious where the errors lie: line outs, tactical kicking, decision making, selection of untouchables, basic handling and catching high balls. Some of this comes down to confidence and you simply don't select players that aren't living up to expectations. Surely others are chomping at the bit for a crack and if they never get the chance then what's stopping them from hitting the minty highway to the NH? Dropping talented players that are out of form will give them the kick up the arse they require and if they don't respond positively then they are surplus to requirements, simple as.
P.S. I don't buy constantly blaming the coach for ineffective tactics as the players are experienced enough at this stage to call 'em as they see'em. I refer back to the RWC game where anyone with half a brain would have said we're being scr$wed by the ref, drop goal time. Ireland had the guts of 5 mins notice to do so against Wales in GS and duly responded.
Anonymous August 02, 2009 11:45 am

Anonymous August 02, 2009 11:52 am

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HZ7iCGYluVU&feature=channel_page
M.A.D. August 02, 2009 12:03 pm

Anonymous August 02, 2009 12:18 pm

Morne steyn is a quality player, i'll give the Sprinkboks that. they deserved too win, I look forward to seeing the springs sort out their backline, that will be a incredible team.
Anonymous August 02, 2009 12:21 pm

my bad.
Anonymous August 02, 2009 12:34 pm

Anonymous August 02, 2009 12:39 pm

Anonymous August 02, 2009 12:41 pm

RD August 02, 2009 12:46 pm

Foitor August 02, 2009 1:37 pm

They seem to be very hard to play with...
Jon August 02, 2009 1:40 pm

Let the buys play rugby.
If your gonna be a pedantic, annoying ref, at least get the goddamn calls right.
The yellow against Ross was BS, the ball was past the last feet, out , and therefor Ross had all rights to the ball. It shouldn't have even been a penalty, let alone a goddamn yellow card. Seriously, learn the rules.
Du Preez also picked the ball up out of the scrum, under someone's feet, which is illegal.
Don't get me wrong, the Boks were the better side over all, and deserved the win, but I wish I could have sat there as a neutral (I'm not a Saffer or a Kiwi) and enjoyed the game, without a stupid pedantic ref, who apparently doesn't know the rules, ruining it with stupid calls. Honestly, why blow the whistle so much? Half the time there was no offense, the ref just seemed to not be used to a quick game. When it's fast and there's a lot of turnovers, it doesn't mean you have to slow the game down out of habit, cuz you're used to a slow, laborious version of the game. Just keep your goddamn whistle away and let us enjoy the action.
Anonymous August 02, 2009 2:04 pm

Anonymous August 02, 2009 3:13 pm

FEDOR August 02, 2009 3:17 pm

Anonymous August 02, 2009 4:15 pm

InsiderShoulder August 02, 2009 5:10 pm

FrankyH August 02, 2009 5:45 pm

It's unbelievable the lengths they go to to try make their side seem hard done by.
They totally contradict themselves too, allll the time. It's just pathetic how one sided they are, to the point of sounding amateur.
Worst part is that they actually believe the drivel that comes out of their mouths.
T August 02, 2009 6:24 pm

Welshman August 02, 2009 10:18 pm

Jon August 02, 2009 11:16 pm

In fact it's better for my side if NZ lose, in terms of winning the tri-nations.
I just hate pedantic, attention whore refs.
Owens needs to keep his bloody whistle in his pocket so I can watch the rugby, rather than him making a show of himself.
Anonymous August 03, 2009 12:07 am

Elliot August 03, 2009 1:45 am

I know he's almost always got the distance, and he's a great kicker no matter what, but it seems like that last half-dozen SA games I've seen, he's tried only to no avail to score a drop goal...maybe I'm just not remembering right, though.
Elliot August 03, 2009 1:49 am

I've seen bad reffing - even from Nigel Owens, himself - but this was a pretty good performance.
Jon August 03, 2009 2:00 am

Don't patronise me you tosser.
There are good refs and bad ones, Owens is pedantic and sees offences where there are none.
bigox August 03, 2009 2:06 am

Despite him not kicking the goals, I think its encouraged because when a drop goal is kicked dead its a 22 drop out...when basically means the Boks just get the ball kicked back to them and they can restart their attack.
Its a win-win situation. Score or get the ball back and have a chance to score again.
Anonymous August 03, 2009 5:23 am

There are good refs and bad ones, Owens is pedantic and sees offences where there are none."
LOL you sound like a sore loser mate.
Jon August 03, 2009 6:13 am

Lost what? I'm not from NZ, I've already said South africa deserved the win.
It's just the ref I have a problem with. He's crap.
Andy August 03, 2009 8:57 am

SA are a fantastic side and the AB's couldn't deal with it, as a result they gave penalties away.
You say the ref didn't let the game flow, what he did was penalise the AB's for not letting the game flow. He said that's illegal and if you do that it's a penalty, they did it, bang 3 points.
I'm not SA or Kiwi it's a completely neutral opinion. Don't blame the ref, he did well and it seems that's all the AB's do when they lose. You should just shake hands and then go back to training and work out how you lost the game.
Jacques August 03, 2009 9:05 am

Jon August 03, 2009 9:09 am

Again, the boks were better, they deserved the victory.
The ref was crap, he blew the whistle too much, often for what, imo, didn't deserve any penalty at all.
He kept slowing down a very fast, exciting game with pedantic officiating.
He got crucial calls wrong and seemed to really really want to yellow card some people for some reason.
It was annoying and as a neutral it made it hard to enjoy the game for what it was.
All that aside, it was still a good game, and further evidence that the Boks are probably the best team in the world, and a terrifying proposition at home.
dyl August 03, 2009 10:01 am

I had thought he got a couple of tricky things right, like the obstruction vs. maul scenario, where the ball was passed before the maul formed, effectively making it obstruction.
There was one instance I didn't get, and that was when NZ wheeled the scrum, but the penalty was awarded to SA for NZ apparently backing up in an effort to wheel it...I thought it was a bit unfair to NZ, but a tough one nonetheless.
vinniechan August 03, 2009 12:45 pm

Havn't seen this kind of back to the basic good rugby for a long time. Still,one player hoarding 31 points in 1 game against the All Blacks is unheard of.
Craig August 03, 2009 3:25 pm

By the way I not trying to have a go or anything, just enjoy talking rugby, let me know what you think.
Craig August 03, 2009 3:27 pm

Kearney for tests August 03, 2009 3:49 pm

Anonymous August 03, 2009 11:09 pm

Coming from NH rugby fan, I personally like Nigel Owens as a ref, hes very straight and doesnt mess around."
How very wrong you are about him being straight...
Jon August 04, 2009 9:36 am

I'll agree with you about the scrum thing. I had a closer look and you're probably right, they weren't bound to the scrum, so fair enough, I stand corrected.
In regards to Ross' yellow, even the yellows against SA, it was overzealous.
Owens seemed a step behind the play and rushed to make descisions, several of which I thought were dubious, or plain wrong.
It was just annoying as a neutral, several times the two teams were going hammer and tong with loads of turnovers and counter attacks, and the ref kept blowing for dubious penalties and stopping the flow of the game.
Anyway, enough about the ref, I've gone on enough.
Take nothing away from the Boks, they're an awesome team, best forward pack in rugby.
ybr August 04, 2009 9:42 am

Anonymous August 04, 2009 10:16 am

diaduit August 04, 2009 11:00 am

Anonymous August 04, 2009 1:22 pm

Huh!! the 3rd August 04, 2009 1:56 pm

Depending on the field position of the kicker, if he misses then the same rule when the ball goes dead over the line should apply. For example, a miss in the 22 or within the 10m line, then a regular 22 drop out. However, misses from outside this should result in scrum from where ball was kicked. This will discourage Steyn from wasting counter attacks and make sure that if he does drop, then he has to be more accurate. Comments welcome.
creggs08 August 04, 2009 1:59 pm

thats true does get annoying everytime steyn gets a ball no matter were from on the pitch he goes for a drop goal but..
at the same time i do love when people can get them from near impossible angles. does look unreal to watch.
but it sounds like a good rule about the 22 m line!!
Anonymous August 04, 2009 3:07 pm

Sorry that is a rubbish rule! F Styne is a bout the only kicker in the world that does thees long drops so you are in my book only trying to attack 1 player that does it and tbh he is maybe thats maybe only 2 times he tries it in all games.
Anonymous August 04, 2009 3:34 pm

Jonathan August 04, 2009 9:49 pm

I can't see what all the hype is about. He runs into the opposition and gets tackled every time. I haven't seem him sidestep or run through a single player in 5 tests this summer. He doesn't appear to be a powerful tackler or a great passer or ditributor of the ball like a Larkham for example.
Seems like he has been living on those 2 long drop goals v. Australia a couple of years ago.
Oh and he is handsome and has nice hair....
Just a Fan August 05, 2009 7:47 am

The New Zealanders are just not used to having their illegal tactics blown up so much.
As for the Frans and Morne going for the drop kicks - I LOVE it!!!! It keeps the opposition on their toes. If it goes over then we get 3 points, and if it doesn't then ball is in their 22...which is great for us. Stop whinging about them, they are as much a part of the game as penalty kicks.
For the short sighted people...when the ball carrier takes a tackle with three or four players of the opposition...he is also taking those 4 guys out of the field of play..... COME ON! guys, rugby is a thinking mans sport...if you don't like tacticle thinking, go watch soccer! Running the ball wide and side stepping all the time didn't do the Kiwis any good. At least the Bokke are capable of adapting...
My blood is GREEN
Huh!! the 3rd August 05, 2009 8:39 pm

And also, I was willing ABs to score one right before Half time when they actually had decent possesion in SA 22, but it seems its against their nature (Carter has only 2 DGs in his AB career). They went for the try, fumbled, SA went down other side and took 3 pts going in at the break. Made a hugh difference.















Commenting as Guest | Register or Login