Wednesday, September 09, 2009
Sam Norton-Knightmare of a debut for the Cardiff Blues
Norton-Knight, whos only 25 but has a fair amount of professional rugby behind him, was predominantly a fullback when playing in Australia. He now insists that his preferred position is at flyhalf, but his performance shows otherwise.
He was replaced after 63 minutes and left the field angrily, tossing his scrumcap to the floor. Coach Dai Young still has faith in his abilities though.
It was a game to forget for him, admitted Young. He is very disappointed and he did not play like he could.
He is a far better player than that and we are confident he will put things right. I am sure he will like to get that game under his belt.
We will put our arm around him because we know he is a better player than that.
He is so disappointed because he wanted to start well. But it does not make him a bad player overnight and I dont want to go overboard. There are very few players in world rugby who dont have a bad game.
And I am sure he is going to get better with every match.
He was very nervous before the match, said Young. In fact, I dont think I have ever seen a debutant so nervous before a match.
The Blues lost the game 22-21.
Time: 02:50
Posted at 10:21 am | 25 comments
|
|
Viewing 25 comments
Kearney for tests September 09, 2009 8:31 am

Anonymous September 09, 2009 8:45 am

Jon September 09, 2009 9:20 am

He was a guy who was tagged early as really promising, but he never fulfilled that promise.
NSW didn't try that hard to keep him, even though he was there starting fullback.
Thing is, he is a decent fullback, good with the high ball, good at running from deep and a good support player.
He's never been a recognized fly-half in top level rugby, he hasn't even had much chance to play there.
He's out of position, in a new team he doesn't know, with players he's never played with before and it shows.
If he was playing at fullback, I'm sure he would have had a much better debut. Playing him at fly half is an experiment.
Duncan September 09, 2009 9:23 am

Anonymous September 09, 2009 9:50 am

opfazonk September 09, 2009 10:50 am

Hackney Griffin September 09, 2009 11:13 am

In what way are Edinburgh a limited side? They finished 2nd in the Magners last year with Phil Godman orchestrating some great rugby behind a solid pack... nothing limited about the rugby they played.
Herbie September 09, 2009 11:54 am

David September 09, 2009 12:27 pm

The blues need to sort it out, i say give him a second chance.
WelshOsprey September 09, 2009 7:58 pm

That dutch winger edinburgh had looked VERY good, Vissing?
F September 09, 2009 9:04 pm

As for Norton-Knight, give him time. It takes a while for a 10 to get used to the players around him and then we'll see him run the show and show us his talents.
Anonymous September 09, 2009 10:36 pm

Anonymous September 09, 2009 10:52 pm

Cardiff have half a team missing due to Lions players resting + injuries and still almost won the game with a flyhalf that couldn't do anything right.....
...if that's playing them off the park....
Alister September 09, 2009 11:20 pm

If you can then checkout the extended coverage on STV's website, find the Magners League programme from Sunday, if you need further proof and I'd also ask you to check recent history of the fixture and spot a common pattern.
Is it Edinburgh's fault that Cardiff couldn't play first teamers? No. Were Edinburgh also missing first teamers? Yes. We could even twist it and ask which team did have an SA Lions player in it if we're going to get like that.
Edinburgh could and maybe should have put the game to bed in the first half and would have felt mightly aggrieved if they not won it, not least for the terrible decision on the first Cardiff try.
Anonymous September 10, 2009 1:15 am

Yes Anonymous they "played them off the park"; the phrase has nothing to do with who's missing now does it?
...
They won by a point and would have lost had Blair kicked the conversion, was my logical point. On top of half the squad missing.
Anonymous September 10, 2009 1:16 am

granite September 10, 2009 8:40 am

Jon September 10, 2009 12:20 pm

NSW had a problem with five eight last year, and alternated between Halangahu and Beale, but never really considered Norton-Knight.
He's never proven that he can marshal a team and his kicking game is only average.
Again, he's a decent fullback, very safe under the high ball, an elusive runner in broken play and a good support player who can finish tries, but he's not a fly-half.
Alister September 10, 2009 11:18 pm

If Blair had kicked his kick then they may have won yes, but if the touch judge had done his job then all things being equal Cardiff wouldn't have been in that position anyway.
Back to the subject, hopefully the lad gets a decent run out this weekend with the pressure off him
Wagga Magpie September 11, 2009 7:47 am

Get dai young out September 11, 2009 8:50 am

Firstly I'm a die hard blues fan, SNK was rubbish, Gwyn Jones' analysis on him in the clip was spot on, I watched the game and can honestly say that he did nothing good.
For the people who took offence about Gwyns comment about Edinburgh being limited, if you watched the whole scrum v show then you would know that Gwyn had a lot of praise for edinburgh and he didn't mean it as a criticism he meant that edinburgh are good at playing a simple game that andy robinson had developed.
For the people who say that SNK hasn't got any high quality experience at fly half then find out in what position he won his two caps for australia. He played full back for aus a and fly half for aus.
No excuses, he was a rubbish buy there are loads of welsh men who can do a better job.
Get dai young out September 11, 2009 8:56 am

Bring back Lee thomas!!
Alister September 11, 2009 9:37 pm

Asterix September 12, 2009 2:47 am

Perhaps he's lost confidence ever since Lote yelled at him?















Commenting as Guest | Register or Login