Saturday, September 19, 2009
All Blacks beat Wallabies to end Tri Nations on a high
It was pretty much a dead rubber as South Africa had already won the Tri Nations title, but pride was at stake as neither Australia nor New Zealand gave up.
The loss for the Wallabies means that they ended the tournament at the bottom of the table, with just one win from six matches.
The All Blacks finished second, eight points behind South Africa with three wins from six after this emphatic win over their neighbours.
Following kicks exchanged by Matt Giteau, Dan Carter, and Berrick Barnes, Corey Jane scored the first try of the match after getting above James OConnor to claim a high kick from Mils Muliaina.
The All Blacks went into the break with a 16-6 lead, before a penalty from Carter and two late tries killed off the visitors.
Maa Nonu showed his strength as he barged through two tackles to score. Joe Rokocoko was also impressive, as he looked for work and was rewarded on the stroke of full time with a try in the corner.
The win means that the All Blacks have comfortably retained the Bledisloe Cup.
Posted at 1:22 pm | 67 comments
|
|
Viewing 67 comments
Phil September 19, 2009 1:44 pm

It was frustrating to watch and even moreso as a Wallabies supporter. Everytime the ABs turned over a ball, I jumped at the screen and shouted "not another one!" Too few at the breakdown. I suppose the ABs were just hungrier for a win.
Ah well...good to see Joe Rokocoko getting into it again. And O'Connor is a slippery one sometimes :)
Anonymous September 19, 2009 2:31 pm

Also, could we have the clip of Dan Carter getting absoulutly smashed at some point in the 2nd half? Seriously one of the hardest tackles i've ever seen, I can't believe he got up from that
Jim
vinniechan September 19, 2009 3:20 pm

I do like the brand of rugby they played 2nite. At least both were unafraid to retain the ball instead of endless kicking.
Anonymous September 19, 2009 5:06 pm

whippetmania September 19, 2009 8:07 pm

alexmclaughlin September 19, 2009 8:27 pm

Anonymous September 19, 2009 9:49 pm

Anonymous September 19, 2009 9:50 pm

Anonymous September 19, 2009 9:52 pm

Anonymous September 19, 2009 10:36 pm

Anonymous September 19, 2009 11:15 pm

Anonymous September 19, 2009 11:35 pm

summary - good team but not all that. benefiting from a very poor Aus side (nothing without mortlock) and a young and transitioning ABs team missing a massive number of top internationals.
Jon September 20, 2009 1:01 am

Mccaw dominated and Carter controlled the game really well.
Australia couldn't build any pressure, because they just kept turning over the ball.
Poor from the Aussies, good from the kiwis.
In a month we'll have one last rematch for the year and hopefully it'll be a better performance from the Aussies.
Anonymous September 20, 2009 1:03 am

The Lions game that the Springboks lost was due to making 10 CHANGES to the starting team, so you can basically call that a B team.
The loss to the Wallabies was one of those things, when the ref allows the opposition to dive into the rucks from everywhere.
Don't try and down play how good the Springboks are, as they are the World Champions, Trination Champions, Lion tamers, Freedom cup, Mandela plate... you can count super 14 if you want... hell, if they were eligible to win the Bledisloe they would have that too, I suggest you be quite, you bitter kiwi.
SPRINGBOKS 3... ALL BLACKS 0
realrugby September 20, 2009 1:03 am

And, if you're a SA fan, hope that they're not peaking too early like the AB's did before the last WC, only to blow it in the WC.
And, if you're an Aussie fan....
Anonymous September 20, 2009 1:04 am

Anonymous September 20, 2009 1:06 am

realrugby September 20, 2009 1:54 am

Anonymous September 20, 2009 1:59 am

Jocko September 20, 2009 2:24 am

But hey we still hammered you guys in brisbane, you guys didnt even score a try.. hahaha
Anonymous September 20, 2009 2:26 am

The Wallabies don't suck they've won the RWC more times than we have maybe last night they weren't as good as they usually are but South Africa are the best in the world at the moment no doubt about it and they deserve to be ranked no.1
Anonymous September 20, 2009 3:00 am

Give yourself a clap, you lost twice to the Springboks and three times to the All Blacks, enjoy your wooden spoon, we'll enjoy our Trinations Trophy. Looks like you lost 5 out of 6 in this years TN, that must feel like a real goal to achieve.
Anonymous September 20, 2009 5:35 am

japanmannz September 20, 2009 6:03 am

granite September 20, 2009 6:19 am

I was surprised to see most people's comments about how bad the Aussies were. I didn't get that impression from the first half at all. Perhaps the 2nd half was much worse?
Anonymous September 20, 2009 8:20 am

Anonymous September 20, 2009 8:50 am

Anonymous September 20, 2009 9:22 am

He didn't play like that against the Springboks because they didn't allow him too? Sure you can crush an Australian team that doesn't try. To bad its 3-0 to the Boks.
Don't be bitter, just because we have the World Cup and every other cup.
MikeB September 20, 2009 9:34 am

Hopefully Henry and co bring on some more younger players for the end of year tour, ie Cruden, Guilford, Whitelock, Ellison.. It would be a shame not to use this injury plagued year as a time to try them out.
When the likes of Kahui, Williams, Chris Jack, Hayman???, Mealamu are back the ABs should retake the no1 spot.
Anonymous September 20, 2009 11:36 am

Anonymous September 20, 2009 12:08 pm

BOKS 2
OZ 2
NZ UMMMMM 1 (NONE WHEN THE GAME TURNED PROFESSIONAL )
AB'S ARE JUST DAMN JEALOUS!! Because they know and the whole rugby world know that the BOKS have beaten them at home this year and last year - ummm where's the next RWC - OH yeah it's in NZ ... where the Boks keep winning - that's what all AB (asshole fans above ) are TRULEY SCARED OF!!!!Keep your overrated coach who says mindless things after matches - the thing is it just grates on all AB fans that they aren't as good as the BOKS come World cup time ( and this from a non-bok fan!) SOUR GRAPES IS ALL I CAN SEE FROM THE AB CAMP!!
Anonymous September 20, 2009 12:14 pm

Well done to the AB's on a great win, and to OZ - you are a young team who are only gana get better!
Thanks for a great 3N - see you both next year!!
sebastian September 20, 2009 2:15 pm

Anonymous September 20, 2009 3:44 pm

granite September 20, 2009 3:46 pm

"kinda sad that the aussies cant turn a one man overlap into a try"
I'm pretty sure Australia has failed in previous games too. My mates and I picked it as soon as Toeava was shown the card. A bit sad, really.
Huh!! the 3rd September 20, 2009 5:32 pm

I like to see a team other than ABs win 3N every now and again, or every 5 years, but some of the Bok posters on here make me wish NZ had won the damn thing again.
To an above Anon poster, regarding the 3rd Lions test, it wasn't 10 changes, 8 at most where the Lions had to make 7 changes and one positional from 2nd test.
Chiliboy, Bekker, Broseuw, Steyn, both centres, both wings = 8. Fourie was an improvement on Jacobs.
Sheridan, Vickery, Worsely, M Williams, Flutey, Bowe to 13, S Williams, Monye = 8
Massively disappointed with Aussies this season. But they are young and will improve.
Toeva had a great game, what a difference from Donald. And the defense on Giteau was top class, he didn't have time all day.
Anonymous September 20, 2009 5:53 pm

Anonymous September 20, 2009 6:00 pm

Anonymous September 20, 2009 8:28 pm

felix September 20, 2009 9:10 pm

to the anonymous who told me to be 'quite', you surely meant 'quiet'.
great way to make a mockery of your point!
anyway, the bok fans seem to protest too much. i think you know i am right. SA are benefitting from the weakness of the rest of the teams in the competition at the moment.
thanks for the SA RWC x 2, AUS RWC x2, NZ rwc x 1 and SA 3 - NZ 0 stats.
here's one for you :
Trinations
NZ = 9
SA = 3
Aus = 2
this is during the professional era i believe?
my point stands - the boks is good. but not great, just better than the competition on average at the moment.
best team of the pro era is still the England world cup winning team in 04. best all round balance and quality i have ever seen.
boomshanka September 20, 2009 10:23 pm

Henry needs a lobotomy.
A meaningless game and he plays a solitary new cap?
Anonymous September 20, 2009 10:27 pm

Chilliboy, Kankowski, Zane Kirchner, Odwa ndungane, Olivier, Fourie, Muller, Jongi Nokwe... Lets not forget that Fourie du Preez got injured before half time and an out of form Pienaar had to play there, a position he had not played for some time.
Anonymous September 20, 2009 10:40 pm

i'm sure in a few years it'll be revealed that Habana is actually a woman
Anonymous September 20, 2009 11:17 pm

Anonymous September 20, 2009 11:44 pm

Rugby is the universe, and Habana is King. Bow down to him.
James September 21, 2009 12:59 am

Anonymous September 21, 2009 1:24 am

Anonymous September 21, 2009 2:19 am

wheatley September 21, 2009 3:48 am

I almost feel speechless after reading all that crap. All I can say about the match is when will the Wallabies learn that if you're losing the rucks, you've got two options a) commit more support at the breakdown or b) get the ball out fast enough to make the other side pay for committing too many defenders.
Anonymous September 21, 2009 6:28 am

He is easily the hardest working back I've ever seen, next time he plays, watch how he is on the constant move, either to cover on the other wing (lachie turner knows) or to run a perfect inside line to score. He wears the standard padding, don't forget he is beefed, at 90kg+.
Anonymous September 21, 2009 10:12 am

Alex September 21, 2009 10:15 am

Anonymous September 21, 2009 11:35 am

Perhaps he was wearing the extra padding due to an injury.
He can adapt though, he is still a massive threat on attack, look at Perth.. 2 tries.
Anonymous September 21, 2009 11:36 am

Huh!! the 3rd September 21, 2009 4:09 pm

On the whole Habana debate, he's 5'8 and weighs 85kg. People have to admit thats impressive. For his work rate alone, I'd take him anyday over every other winger in Rugby, besides Dougie Howlett, and he's already here in Munster.
Anonymous September 22, 2009 3:49 am

I had no idea he was so small, pretty impressive.
I used to think size was everything but seeing Cory Jane and Anthony Tuitavake be so dominate in NZ rugby over the last couple of years has proved me wrong.
Don't get me wrong, Big wingers like Gear/Roks are great still.
felix September 22, 2009 7:10 pm

he is just over 5'10" - 1.79m
check his bulls profile















Commenting as Guest | Register or Login