Sunday, November 08, 2009
Australia too good for England at Twickenham

Australia overcame their first hurdle in an attempt to emulate the class of 84 as they beat England 18-9 at Twickenham on Saturday.
The Wallabies put their poor Tri Nations season behind them as they came back from being 9-5 down at half time with a far better second half showing, with young scrumhalf Will Genia putting in a man of the match performance.
It was an England side buoyed by the return of Jonny Wilkinson, but the Aussies absorbed the pressure then gradually took control of the match.
Coach Robbie Deans was impressed with the patience shown by his side.
I was happy with the way we kept out composure and wore them down," he said.
"The guys didn't become frantic after the missed opportunities and that trust and patience paid off and that's a habit we want to keep."
England have an unprecedented amount of injuries at the moment, with only four of Martin Johnsons team having taken to the field in the corresponding fixture last year.
The form of returning world cup winners Lewis Moody, Steve Thompson, and flyhalf Wilkinson was a positive for the England coach.
"It's great to have them back," said Johnson. "People have asked me all week what Jonny brings to the game and I'd say 'just watch the game' - he's a world class player," he said.
Wilkinson landed a drop goal after three minutes as he signalled his return to the international game in style. He tackled as hard as ever, and at one stage it looked as though he was going to lift the England side to victory.
Australia, with injury concerns of their own, had many opportunities and only needed to capitalise on two of them. Eight points from Matt Giteau and the first half try to Genia, along with a great second half try to Adam Ashley-Cooper, sealed the win.
Time: 08:38
Posted at 11:59 am | 93 comments
|
|
Viewing 93 comments
Jazza November 08, 2009 12:07 pm

themull November 08, 2009 12:14 pm

But from what I heard outside of these highlights England were very very poor on the day...
Anybody who actually saw the match, is this true?
nick November 08, 2009 12:17 pm

Like you say wilkinsons tackles were huge but i hope this puts a silence to the idea wilkinson can carry a team by himself even if he did have a very positivie impact
Anonymous November 08, 2009 12:18 pm

nick November 08, 2009 12:20 pm

only showed half of wilko's tackles tbf, there were a couple of other belters
Anonymous November 08, 2009 12:23 pm

Phil November 08, 2009 12:37 pm

Quite a few big hits in this game.
Big hits on Banahan from Elsom (and vice versa).
I think it was a fair performance from the green and gold...wasn't exactly a comfortable win with too many penalties conceded and not enough protection around the scrum.
Ah well...on to Ireland!
Anonymous November 08, 2009 12:38 pm

Anonymous November 08, 2009 12:41 pm

Sam Brown November 08, 2009 12:53 pm

Jazza November 08, 2009 1:01 pm

YES!! AUSTRALIANS ALL LET US REJOICE FOR WE ARE YOUNG AND FREE!!!
Jot November 08, 2009 1:09 pm

Well played Australia! England = average.
Ted November 08, 2009 1:20 pm

Geraghty, who I had high hopes for, was terrible. Other than Moody and Wilko in fact, everyone was terrible.
Good luck to the Ozzies - sat next to a couple from Oz while watching the game and they were great people. I think Ireland and Wales will put up more of a fight than we did.
Kearney for tests November 08, 2009 1:31 pm

decepti0n November 08, 2009 1:42 pm

Good win and the hit I remember is Palu on some little guy. Also Wilko's chip-bounce-catch-flickback, fantastic.
sport of kings November 08, 2009 2:01 pm

Anonymous November 08, 2009 2:18 pm

Anonymous November 08, 2009 2:35 pm

Genia had a very good game. Truth be told the Aussies should have scored 2 more tries..with Elsom bucthcering one when he went it alone when all he had to do was pass 5 yards aout ann the Auddie center Ioane....knocked on going over the line.
Devil's advocate? This England team had never played tpgether before. Remember in the late 1980s early 1990s...a fan could name what the team was going to be in every game! Andrew Carling Gucott Underwood...etc Not so now and it shows.
RD November 08, 2009 2:56 pm

Anonymous November 08, 2009 3:19 pm

Anonymous November 08, 2009 3:26 pm

there's no oxymoron, moron.
Anonymous November 08, 2009 3:27 pm

Ireland for WC 2011 November 08, 2009 3:51 pm

just one idea,and im not saying its perfect,is to have a cap on the no. of forwards allowed in the backline during each phase, therefore leaving more space for the backs.anyone have any other ideas?
Ireland for WC 2011 November 08, 2009 3:53 pm

Anonymous November 08, 2009 4:26 pm

Are you serious? As a practical matter, how the hell is the ref going to police that during a fast moving match. It would be impossible...and the game would have penalties every 30 seconds.
One idea might be to allow a player to call a mark when catching a kick anywhere on the field...not just in his 22. Then players would be less likely to kick the up and under which we saw for the entire 1st half of the Wales NZ game.
Anonymous November 08, 2009 5:03 pm

No.7 November 08, 2009 5:56 pm

So anyway congrats to Aus for the win. Although england need to seriously look at some of those weak tries because the first try from the no.9 was seriously awful...not from the aus point of view, good build up and a nice try, but from eng point of view, i mean that is a text book move...
Soooo to sum up, congrats to australia and comiserations to england!
and a thanks to RD for the vid
Anonymous November 08, 2009 6:11 pm

*shakes head*
flapjack November 08, 2009 6:14 pm

I was actually impressed with Haskell (he may sound like a tit when he talks, but he showed up and put himself to work for certain), and Monye didn't drop every ball (just one!) - so he must be improving...but fullback?? Man, I bet they wish they had Armitage on form.
As for OZ, they looked pretty solid (not outstanding, but definitely solid) and they have good runners...the only weak link I'd figure is Quade Cooper. But I might be bias against the guy who looks like he's got a dead animal on his head. Giteau was great, as usual.
Can't wait for Ireland-OZ, it's bound to be a fight for both sides.
Anonymous November 08, 2009 7:25 pm

Australia had a really good second half and did few mistakes. Genia and Copper had an awesome game and will definitely be good for Australia's future since there are so young, but would of liked too see OConner, but AAC scored a magnificent try and he too had a good game!
WelshOsprey November 08, 2009 7:27 pm

Put a small elusive winger against him and let the fun begin.
Wilkinson looked solid.
Cheesekiwi November 08, 2009 7:43 pm

Also a stupid idea. Every time a player kicks the ball, the opposing players can counterattack. If they also can call a mark, they are less likely to do so. Defences have time to regroup after a mark, if you observe closely even a tap after a mark is usually too late. Players will always get caught by a defences if they run the ball them Even one counterattack can make a difference. With this rule it would literally become pingpong, with backs only being picked on their ability to kick. Your new rule will mean the demolishing of rugby completely and it is worse than the new rules (sorry mate!)
'Banahan is a joke, he has NO acceleration.
Put a small elusive winger against him and let the fun begin.'
Exactly, tha would be fun. Even though he isn't fast, Banahan is strong and he would waltz over the small elusive winger!
Anonymous November 08, 2009 8:49 pm

but then the small winger would just take him on the outside for pace:)?
Hooker_ November 08, 2009 8:52 pm

www.realrugby.com November 08, 2009 9:31 pm

Australia gets hammered in the Tri-Nations, yet shows up and beats England.
Now, was England bad because they're just not good, they had an off day, or because Australia is that much better and made them look bad?
An interesting match in the whole SH v NH debate is the Scotland v Fiji match coming up.
mise November 08, 2009 9:40 pm

The 'answer' is obvious I'm afraid, and it happens in the thing Rugby Union is turning into....rugby league. 13 men. Its so coming its not funny. Bye Bye flankers, or bye bye one flanker and a back.
Union is turning, year upon year, into League. Professionalisation has resulted in all the stuff league did years and years ago creeping into union.
In the end, growth of the game will actually come from an amalgamation of the two codes, probably 5-10 years after Union goes to 13 men.
From 'our' perspective this will be fine as Union will be negotiating from a position of strength. And whatever else about League, they are nonsense geezers who could probably add a bit of bite to Union.
Re the match: what were engerland at? Lateral lateral lateral. No penetration or imagination.
They are not in good shape at the moment. Leister are better (than Oz too!)
rodofle November 08, 2009 9:47 pm

Anonymous November 08, 2009 9:52 pm

Everyone seems to forget Oz is up against SA and NZ, the two best teams in the world. Losing to them doesn't automatically mean you're poor.
No.7 November 08, 2009 9:52 pm

I think the guy given some more opportunities will prove his worth!
Anonymous November 08, 2009 9:56 pm

Ay November 08, 2009 10:27 pm

Drop goal in the first 3 minutes? whats wrong with that? Its a mental blow to the opposition if you score like that. The way you win test match rugby = getting into your oppo 22 and coming away with points all the time.
Learn rugby.
Huh!! the 3rd November 08, 2009 10:34 pm

NZ should have cut Wales apart when it became obvious Wales weren't going to play and limit the scoreboard damage. SA, with probably the best backline in rugby, won't use them unless they have to (I hope I'm wrong, I really do), and will continue to win. In their 9 tests this season, they've used them twice, in the 2nd Lions test when it became clear the Lions had upped their game, forcing them to, and the Perth game, when they saw the 3N in sight.
Is it that all nations employ Rugby League coaches in Defense? With the continued use of the 'blitz' or rushing just like league, attacks have to kick or use a battering forward or back to go through. Tries are now scored more often than not through defensive mistakes rather than skill or attacking flair.
If we want to distinguish ourselves from League, we have to keep the flankers but use a similar 'use it or lose it policy'. If a maul isn't going anywhere the ref can call a halt, so if teams are just going to pick and drive through phases without going anywhere, there should be a 10 phase limit or something. This kind of happened in the Eng/ Aus match when the ref clearly got annoyed with Aus and awarded Eng a non existent pen towards the end. The IRB needs to take a stand very quickly.
Brent Pope made a great comment on RTE about Head Coaches being so afraid to lose that they'll spend the whole game kicking and waiting for opposition mistakes and not let the backs run ball. I wholeheartedly agree.
I was looking forward to these AIs, as I'm sure everyone else was, but I think they could continue along these lines. Hopefully I'm wrong and the France and Ireland games step up a gear.
Apologies for the length of this rant but I'm a bit pissed off with where rugby is going.
Iggy November 08, 2009 11:10 pm

League defenders are pathetic, look at Tahu or Ryan cross... they simply think you must come in to have a 3 on 1 bugger tackle, its just in their instinct to gang up and bugger the attacker to the floor and then hold him down for a good 15 seconds of pure pumping.
Rugby dying? Was it just me or is it now an Olympic sport? yeah.
You're watching test match rugby, where winning is all that matters.
Anonymous November 08, 2009 11:17 pm

And to think they had the cheek to accuse SA in the Tri Nations of not running the ball enough and kicking the skin off it hahaha. Pathetic.
And Wales for gods sake take it like men. Whing about NZ should have been playing with 14 men etc. Wheres your pride - dont you want to win against 15? Do you need it to be 14 to put one past NZ? Gatland you twerp.
Anonymous November 08, 2009 11:27 pm

felix November 08, 2009 11:39 pm

Leave that to the boks.
Anonymous November 09, 2009 12:07 am

Yeah a real big mental blow 3-0 after 3 mins....we only have 77 mins left boys what will we do!?
Blizti November 09, 2009 12:19 am

and Anon, drop goals are valuable no matter what time you take them. Fool.
vinniechan November 09, 2009 12:24 am

Doing absolutely everything with FA to work with
quaderz November 09, 2009 12:25 am

Anonymous November 09, 2009 12:38 am

You'll find all the good players have no tattoos. Look how many Springbok players have tattoos... any?
Anonymous November 09, 2009 1:35 am

But yes, Banahan is too slow and bad at kicking to be playing international wing.
ollie November 09, 2009 1:40 am

teams don't want the ball anymore. That's a disaster. Incredibly boring match.
Heres hoping France NZ will offer something interesting.
(I know this is an Oz England thread, but I'm just adding to the discussion on the state of the game that's also running trou here)
zacca November 09, 2009 1:50 am

zeddo November 09, 2009 2:02 am

james o'connor is a better player than wilkinson ever was. both came into international stage at around 18 and jamesy has already achieved more (playing for the men of gold is worth more than playing for england)
AUSSI AUSSI AUSSI! OI OI OI!
zed ooh November 09, 2009 2:14 am

Anonymous November 09, 2009 2:38 am

Vic November 09, 2009 3:53 am

James From Syd November 09, 2009 4:13 am

Anonymous November 09, 2009 4:56 am

Not sure about that big English winger though, seems a little flat footed.. Perhaps thats because the mid-field aren't giving him good ball.
JuiCe November 09, 2009 5:14 am

I wouldn't go as low as you and say your country doesn't have a history cos i am not gona stoop as low as you m8.
BTW GG OZ and its nice to see Wilco doing well.
QLDAAAA November 09, 2009 5:22 am

It was great to see the team that was there to play Rugby won.
Perth tacklebag November 09, 2009 5:46 am

Anonymous November 09, 2009 5:58 am

Anonymous November 09, 2009 7:36 am

Zavala November 09, 2009 8:25 am

Anonymous November 09, 2009 8:33 am

Anyways, I've never been a huge Monye fan, but it seems like he's taking some slack in the English press for his performance, which wasn't really all that bad (Banahan was far worse to have at wing than Monye at fullback...).
Anonymous November 09, 2009 8:47 am

wilko did everything you can expect of him and showed what england needed in attack and defense, but with no one else showing glimpses of attacking brilliance (bar one very good run by haskell) what can you expect...
garathy tried but failed, hipkiss did what he does best and thats just keep on your feet in the tackle so the big boys can drive him on(which in international level is just not enough)
monye looked not to bad at 15 but MJ should put him back where he belongs on the wing and get banahan back on the bench with foden at full back. deacon in the pack looked like a boy. and at number9, care he summed up the england performance in all, to slow at the breakdown and to slow to give the ball to the backs
FrankyH November 09, 2009 8:54 am

I also think he showed moments on saturday that looked like him about 6 years ago. Brilliant. Courageous, powerful, skilful. Just awesome. Well done Aussies though.. I was glad the SH did it over the NH.. thats just the way it goes, although ideally that match for me would have been a draw, with neither poms nor aussies winning ;)
Anonymous November 09, 2009 9:28 am

Anonymous November 09, 2009 9:49 am

Minus Wilkinson and Moody the rest of the England team got played off the field by there opposite number. The Oz backs look dangerous with the ball and always about 4 steps ahead. There back three carried the ball well, and there scrum is (finally) functioning well. Genia is there find of the season.
Why the hell is thompson playing? slow, old and doesn't carry any more. Get Hartley on with Chuter as reserve. Goode on the bench? is the the 2003 reunion show. We need to get decent replacement 10's sorted otherwise one knock to Wilkinson and we're really in trouble. What was the deal with putting two monster wingers up against two fast wingers with a decent turn of pace? Niether Mitchell or Hynes(?) ever struggled with them and left them for dead on quite a few occasions. You need someone like JSD or Varndell in those situations.
It is an improvement from the England team of 18 months ago but there's still a lot to do. Thank god we aren't playing the boks!
vinniechan November 09, 2009 10:41 am

Anyone who think England had a decent defence, that was cux Wilko made 15 tackles to patch it up.
I won't blame Geragty just yet. The only IC who's played well outside Wilko since 2003 was Catt. Remember the excitement of the prospect of the Wilko-Barkley axis in RWC 2007? Barkley then just folded. Now same thing happened. To be honest, we were lucky to have Geragty to clear the line when Wilko was stuck in contact quite a few times
butler November 09, 2009 10:46 am

Trys win matches not drop goals and penalites england.
It was great to see the team that was there to play Rugby won"
Points win matches, which come from all 3 options - that's the biggest steaming load of crap I've read in all these comments (and there's a lot of it here).
It requires ability, tactics, line-breaking, quick ball to force penalties against better teams to get the points.
With both teams having injury problems - just highlights the lack of depth in quality that the English have.
In Banahan's defence for his lack of kicking ability - I never rated Tuqiri as much of a kicker (though that's possibly why he's been chucked out the side now that the game's evolved so much). He's young and one-dimensional - where he goes from here would be interesting (though probably not unexpected as he disappears off the int' scene)
QLDAAAA November 09, 2009 11:19 am

England kicked a drop goal in the 3ed min of the game and never look like scoring a try throughout the entire match because its not their game plan. The fact of the matter is that when they come up against an attacking side hungry for tries and able to defend (like the Wallabies) they have no hope, they have nothing to fall back on. Once Australia scored their second try England had to step up and play proper rugby (yes i said proper rugby) they just couldn't do it.
I agree with Perth tacklebag "running rugby wins in the end".
A win for the Wallabies and a win for Rugby.
Andy November 09, 2009 11:45 am

Thought the OZ 12, 9 and 8 were outstanding. Absolutely rock solid in defence all day and fairly good in attack but they didn't need to be that good becasue we tackled like kids. I'm embarassed.
Wales NZ game was pretty good i thought, don't know why people are saying that was poor.
pi$$ed off England fan
Lorcan November 09, 2009 12:56 pm

You can only play what's in front of you so well done to oz on the win but seriously, Ireland should beat them in Dublin.
Anonymous November 09, 2009 1:31 pm

Anonymous November 09, 2009 2:08 pm

*COUGH* springboks Leicester *COUGH*
keithxv November 09, 2009 3:38 pm

wilkinson is a god
Ireland for WC 2011 November 09, 2009 5:37 pm

Anonymous November 09, 2009 5:43 pm

TobyC November 09, 2009 7:02 pm

You'll find all the good players have no tattoos. Look how many Springbok players have tattoos... any?"
He has tattoos in memory of his grandfather who flew lancaster bombers during the war....http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/rugby_union/article6906816.ece
and i'm not sure fiji / tonga / NZ Maori's will agree with you on the no good players have tattoo's...
Lorcan November 09, 2009 10:20 pm

*COUGH* springboks Leicester *COUGH*
LOL
Can't wait for Saturday!
goodNumber10 November 10, 2009 7:11 am

Even with all the injuries, Englands lack of shape upfront meant we couldn't compete in the loose.
And while England tried to play with width you have to play on the gain line and the speed of the ball prevented wilko and co playing flat.
Yet again we're left wondering what game the england coaches are trying to develop, fast backs slow forwards - doesn't take a genius to realise this wont really work.
He's got to bring Haskell, Lawes and Hartley in, if he dosn't we deserve to get d*cked by Argentina and NZ just to flag up how wrong they are going with their game plan.
Welshy November 10, 2009 11:11 pm

Its still 2-0 to the Southern Hemisphere.
Anonymous November 11, 2009 12:25 am

Anonymous November 14, 2009 11:59 pm

'pride comes before a fall' sums it up pretty well i reckon.















Commenting as Guest | Register or Login