Monday, December 14, 2009
Julien Dupuy attacks the eyes of Stephen Ferris
While the highlights clip didnt show the incident too clearly, weve got a better piece of footage for you here today, which includes it slowed down, as well as words from Ferris following the match.
Dupuy, who was yellow carded earlier for an off the ball shoulder charge, raked his fingers over the face and eyes of Ferris not once, but twice.
The British & Irish Lions player did well not to react, but a fight broke out at the same time, with two other players being yellow carded.
One of those players, Stade Francais prop David Attoub, is also the focus of attention this morning as a photograph of him shoving his finger into Ferris eye is also being reviewed, apparently. You can view that here .
The two will more than likely be fingered by the citing commissioner some time today. Dupuy will be anyway, as it might be difficult to suspend a player based on a photograph like that.
"I was furious," said Ferris, who had his headgear ripped off during the incident.
"When I was on the ground I felt numerous fingers in my eye. There was argy-bargy throughout the game, and I don't mind that, rugby is a physical game.
"I would hate to get anyone cited and if someone hit me a dig in the jaw I would take it and get on with the game, but not when someone goes for your eyes. It's disappointing because I thought it was being cut out of the game, but it still seems to be in the French game and it has to be cut out.
"I will just let the citing commissioner sort it out. There was no apology afterwards. All Dupuy said to me on the pitch was 'I did not do anything, nothing happened' and I said well soon see and just walked off."
If convicted, Dupuy will face a lengthy ban that will be at least as severe as what Shane Jennings recently got handed, 12 weeks, for an incident that didnt look as bad as this one. Well keep you updated as we hear more.
UPDATE: Dupuy has been handed 6 months for his actions. Attoub's case is postponed until further evidence is available.
Ulster impressive as they beat Stade Francais at Ravenhill
Shane Jennings cited for alleged eye gouge on Nick Kennedy
Leicester vs Bath - Big hits and Dupuy's winning try
Posted at 10:30 am | 200 comments
|
|
Viewing 200 comments
Gavin December 14, 2009 11:26 am

Gavin December 14, 2009 11:31 am

Idiot.
WhyIsTheAnonymousAbo December 14, 2009 11:33 am

French coward December 14, 2009 11:36 am

Andy December 14, 2009 11:38 am

Althougth to be fair to him after the ban they gave burger he probably thought it was part of the rules and perfectly legal.
Anonymous December 14, 2009 11:38 am

Anonymous December 14, 2009 11:42 am

Anonymous December 14, 2009 11:42 am

Jon December 14, 2009 11:45 am

Gouging is the lowest act. Imagine attacking someone's eyes with your fingers in a game. So cowardly.
Ban the both of them for 3 months.
Anonymous December 14, 2009 11:45 am

he should be handed a huge ban but i think the best punishment would be to leave him and fferris alone in a room for 5 minutes, i dotn think he would do it again after that
Anonymous December 14, 2009 11:46 am

Parisse and Burger got slpas on the wrist because they are high profile internationals and have the weight of their respective unions.
Why is it that fringe international players like Jennings, Tincu and Neil best always get made an example of.
Anonymous December 14, 2009 11:48 am

PS : As a french supporter it sucks for the french national team...
RD December 14, 2009 11:50 am

Jack December 14, 2009 11:59 am

Anonymous December 14, 2009 12:00 pm

Ferris and some Ulster players spent their time offside and cheating on rucks, Pearson never took responsibility during this game to penalised Ulster. Therefore Stade Francais got frustrated and Dupuy eye goughed Ferris.
Dupuy will get a lenghty ban and thats fair but French club should pull out of the H cup, and let british and Irish have fun together
as some referrings during the previous heineken games have been appalling.
Anglo saxons players are cheting pussies, except when they play in France, where they praise the passion in our country.
When you cheat at rugby expect to be punish, first by the ref or by the opposing team, in this case Dupuy.
In the end if Pearson had been partial and sanctionned Ultser infrigements (so as Stade) from the begginning it would have never happenned.
Fluff December 14, 2009 12:06 pm

FrankyH December 14, 2009 12:07 pm

@Jack: ...and Parisse.. and Quinlan.. and Jennings. What exactly is the so called 'Justice' that you would have liked to have seen with Burger?
You'd probably want him to be out for a year at least, but if the same were done to other players who 'made contact with the eye area', you'd probably moan about them being harshly dealt with.
Anonymous December 14, 2009 12:11 pm

jay December 14, 2009 12:14 pm

Now it's not because you see illegal things in your opinion that you should or will take justice in your own "hands"...
Ban the man, make it an example... but don't start drawing conclusions : "french have always been that way"... the nation has had 10-15 years of clean attempted rugby, unlike the 80's where the french were known for being dirty and undisciplined.
Now don't make it too obvious as the IRB has never been on our side regarding suspensions (too many examples to cite... Tincu last year being the best one : catches a punch in the face anf gets banned 4 months vs. ... an english team)
Jose December 14, 2009 12:15 pm

jay December 14, 2009 12:17 pm

On another note I found the british broadcast to be very one-sided. In France Roncero throwing a punch ? We'll show it while commentators wil be : "erf, that doesn't look good for him"
O'Connel throwing a fist ? : we'll show you the good run the inside center had 5 min. ago ...
olwakachangchang December 14, 2009 12:18 pm

What's up with the idiots in french rugby, there seems to be a surprising amount of them.
Bamberio December 14, 2009 12:28 pm

Shane Jennings was banned for 3 months for making contact with the eye area of Nick Kennedy which was deemed to be at the lower end on the scale of seriousness by the disciplinary panel. Kennedy himself said he exaggerated his reaction and yet Jennings had his appeal for the ban to be reduced overturned.
Therefore with this precedent set, Dupuy should get a 3 month ban at the very least.
Why do players think theyll get away with this nowadays when there are so many cameras at games?
Gavin December 14, 2009 12:29 pm

Anonymous December 14, 2009 12:33 pm

its the worst offence ina way as its premeditated and can blind. spear tackles similar, and can paralise.
Jack December 14, 2009 12:35 pm

If you can show me video of O'Connell throwing a punch because he loses his discipline, I will agree with you. But you will not find this video - O'Connell and other good players are about CONTROLLED aggression. He knows if he punches somebody his team will be punished. For example - the time that Jamie Cudmore attacked him and he did not hit back until everybody could see that Cudmore was attacking him first. That is intelligent. Punching a guy first (like Cudmore) is dumb. There is a perception outside France that French rugby is very dirty, although the style and skills of French players is also admired.
Also you complain about the British broadcast - but realise there will always be differences in style. The Irish broadcasters are also different to the French and British.
Anonymous December 14, 2009 12:42 pm

'Now will dupuy be as mocked as schalk burger was (which was no eye gouge at all) or does that only apply to those "evil" springboks?...'
waawaawaaa.. he got caught and he got a fairly short ban, get over it.
NiWiTa December 14, 2009 12:48 pm

In what sport on earth is this behaviour remotely acceptable. Poorly timed challenges can happen but gouging requires real deliberation and is career threatening. The IRB needs to make a blanket ruling for the future that this type of behaviour will result in a 12 month or permanent ban period. As for Dupuy 12 weeks is what he should get as per current regulations (or have I got this wrong).
Anonymous December 14, 2009 1:06 pm

Eddingtonsons December 14, 2009 1:18 pm

Jack December 14, 2009 1:20 pm

I think that the picture clearly shows the prop was also gouging. If you played rugby, you would know that you do no stick out a finger like that on a rugby pitch without a very good reason, especially in a ruck, because fingers will break quite easily when something hits them. If he is not gouging, can you offer an explanation as to why one finger is sticking out of his fist and is in Ferris's eye?
I think it is pretty clear that he was, but that is just my opinion.
O. December 14, 2009 1:23 pm

jay December 14, 2009 1:36 pm

My example wasn't so much for O'Connel who is a talented lock, no doubt about it... I should have said Martin Johnson back in the days :P
The incident with Cudmore (not french btw and not a Xman :P...) was totally well handled by the ref., as Jami does that very often even in the TOP14 and yet he showed a really agressive game yesterday without the stupidity he usually brings along.
Anyhow, Broadcast is handled differently, fine. My point being that the french way of showing things seems to be a bit more objective.
We show everything we've seen rather than showing what's good for us or bad for them... hence the example with big ol Roncero.
Broadcast can be different and yet imo showing the reality of the game objectively is the keypoint, rather than filtering through the rushes to make someone look good ...or not.
Anonymous December 14, 2009 1:44 pm

Jack December 14, 2009 1:53 pm

A good point, well made. I agree with you.
Anonymous December 14, 2009 2:17 pm

Oh, come on, RD, this is a family website, lol
Peter de Villers December 14, 2009 2:18 pm

If you dont like the contact maybe you should go down to your local dance shop and buy a tutu
kevdetoulouse December 14, 2009 2:35 pm

Why not for life!!!
Olivar December 14, 2009 2:36 pm

I don't think I need to call this out, as it seems Gavin already has. Just realise that not all Anglophones are, indeed, Anglo-Saxon (it's almost as to say all "French" are, in fact, "Parisians").
As for the video...not so sure I see gouging actually take place, but - ohhhh, wait a minute - nevermind. He goes in with a vulcan-death-pinch going on with his hand - something out of the Three Stooges! I first thought it was Dupuy just trying to cop a feel of Ferris' face...I didn't really see the fingers outstretched like that.
I've gotta say, it looks bad for Dupuy.
Don't come with the, "Ferris was holding Dupuy for no reason" excuse - that happens at EVERY ruck. If you're standing behind the ruck, expect some forward to grab your jersey - most of the time, the defender will be man enough to swing an arm out and hit the rucking player's arm until he lets go - refs are (usually) fine with that - even as a wing, I know that. It takes a little wormy scrummie to get his panties twisted and go for the eyes.
FLOOZ December 14, 2009 2:43 pm

the british or irish do the fouls in the rucks and the stupid french players crack as they can't keep their nerves...
Dupuy will surely take an huge and deserved ban for this eye-gouge and the flankers will continue to cheat in the rucks without any penalties...
French are stupid, gay (beacause of their pink shirts) dirty, they smell bad, they haven't any education (Gavin)...
same old stories do the same old punishments
Boshking December 14, 2009 2:52 pm

Chris December 14, 2009 3:10 pm

Luke December 14, 2009 3:11 pm

will more than likely be fingered by the citing comissioner sometime
fingered by the citing comissioner
lol
Gavin December 14, 2009 3:27 pm

I'm sorry if some French posters here make French people look stupid by calling Irish people 'Anglo Saxons' but you should argue with them, not with me!
PokePoke December 14, 2009 3:38 pm

Jack December 14, 2009 3:49 pm

Ferris is Irish. Whether he also considers himself British, I've no idea but he probably does.
rodofle December 14, 2009 3:55 pm

I'm french and i really hope Dupuy will get a long ban, but please don't generalise and start stereotyping the french. If you do you're a moron.
clem December 14, 2009 4:03 pm

When you will be able to make the same lesson with the different origins of french people, maybe we can talk about that together.
And french people are maybe arrogant and paranoid, but they are as educated than anglo-saxons, and don't have history of british islands colonization in their school programs, sorry.
PokePoke December 14, 2009 4:05 pm

Shaft December 14, 2009 4:13 pm

Dupuy did what he did because he's an idiot, not because he's French.
English, Irish, South African, and Italian players have all done the same thing in recent times. Don't have a go at the French for this.
6Buzz6 December 14, 2009 4:17 pm

Gavin December 14, 2009 4:24 pm

You obviously need a history lesson because you are making a mistake as big as saying that German people and French people are the same. It is insulting to both people, not because one is better than the other, but because they are just different.
If other people can know that Catalans, Basques, Bretons etc. exist in France, then surely you can learn that Welsh is not the same as English?
So, to repeat, calling anybody except the English 'Anlgo Saxon' is wrong. Do you also call the Autralians 'Anglo Saxon'? And the New Zealanders? Or does your history book tell a little more about them? This sort of stuff is common knowledge in most first-world counries.
JPM December 14, 2009 4:28 pm

But they won't be.
Jack December 14, 2009 4:29 pm

Secondly, Irish people generally have a great relationship with English, Scottish, and Welsh people. There is a strong sporting rivalry with England (not Britain) for historic reasons. The history of Ireland is quite complicated, but you can read all about it for free on Wikipedia if you are interested.
In some sports, there is a team for Northern Ireland and for the Republic of Ireland - for example, soccer. In other sports, there is one team for all of Ireland, such as in rugby. This is again for historic reasons.
Mike December 14, 2009 4:36 pm

Please teach Clem that Celts and Anglo-Saxons are not the same!
Rodofle - you are correct, stereotyping is stupid. Players from lots of countries have been banned recently for gouging. But it is ironic that guys like Clem from France wants to stereotype everyone from Scotlans, Wales and Ireland as anglo-saxons.
JPM - good point about the drugs. A young T14 French player may be in serious trouble now as he was caught using cannabis. How would cannabis help his rugby? He should not be seriously punished I think.
Chucky December 14, 2009 4:40 pm

I pulled at a guys nose on satursday to wind him up and he claimed i tried to gouge him. people have always put hands in faces to wind people up. Any fingers on the face whether meant or not is now always claimed as "gouging'. Its now a universal witch hunt.
Anonymous December 14, 2009 4:49 pm

Jim December 14, 2009 4:50 pm

As a player, the answer is obvious - don't stick your hand in someone's face. If you are going to break the rules to 'wind someone up', don't be outraged if you get done for a more serious crime than you were attempting - the fact is you shouldn't be breaking the rules at all. Especially if you are a pro and there are 6 cameras watching you!
Andy December 14, 2009 4:57 pm

Ireland for WC 2011 December 14, 2009 4:59 pm

sebastian December 14, 2009 5:01 pm

eyegougin cant be tolerated!
FrankyH December 14, 2009 5:06 pm

Jim is also correct though - play with fire, and you're going to get burnt. The more I think about it, it's a despicable act, and I'd really love to hear Dupuys version of why he did it.
When I was younger I never heard about eye-gouging. Perhaps it was pre-RD days, and before the internet and tv coverage was so good. Or perhaps it just didn't happen, but whatever the case, it's a a disgusting message that is being sent to youngsters.
Anonymous December 14, 2009 5:12 pm

Mike December 14, 2009 5:13 pm

Tom December 14, 2009 5:20 pm

Same thing for Ferris' reaction about the "French game". It is not the French game, it is stupid players in the French championship (as it is in every championship in the world).
If I can say two words about rugby: this kind of thing is a complete disgrace. Dupuy should be banned for a very long time.
clem December 14, 2009 5:26 pm

I misspoke myself : I would say that people who use that term are mistaking, but this is more inattention and speed-speaking that a real lack of education. I think the majority of french rugby fans know well the difference between celts and anglo-saxons.
Nevertheless you have to admit that an inattention mistake is easily done with the differences between U. Kingdom, Wales, Eire, England, Scotland, Great britain, Northern Ireland... It's obvious for you but unfortunately not for everyone.
Sorry if I hurt you.
Gavin December 14, 2009 5:28 pm

I understand your point. Thanks for understanding mine :)
Tijn December 14, 2009 5:35 pm

Jean December 14, 2009 5:44 pm

Mike December 14, 2009 5:54 pm

Did you ever notice how the guys making the most ignorant comments on message boards come from countries with a history of enslaving other peoples, until they get kicked out by every one of them?
3/4 centre December 14, 2009 5:54 pm

I think the people who insult others without even giving a name is a beautiful example of peace.
Gavin December 14, 2009 6:04 pm

I agree. There are so many fools on the internet. What the hell has war to do with gouging? And anyway, didn't Dylan Hartley of England get a 6 month ban for gouging?
Anyway, both Atoub and Dupuy have now been cited. I hope they get long punishments!
goodNumber10 December 14, 2009 6:12 pm

If found guilty he deserves a lenghty ban - at least 12 weeks
:) December 14, 2009 6:21 pm

'The two will more than likely be FINGERED by the citing commissioner some time today'
....awful awful awful pun!
....who will cite the citing commissioner?!?
:) December 14, 2009 6:25 pm

'The more I think about it, it's a despicable act, and I'd really love to hear Dupuys version of why he did it.'
It wasnt really dupuy, it was a crab person in disguise...
Mike December 14, 2009 6:26 pm

Hat goes off to Ferris for focusing on the rugby instead of revenge.
Anonymous December 14, 2009 6:52 pm

Anonymous December 14, 2009 6:55 pm

Edbok December 14, 2009 6:57 pm

As fans, however, the best we can do is urge the suits to get serious about punishing gouging. It is right at the top end of foul play, it deserves the lengthiest bans, and it would be nice to see some consistency to emerge somewhere.
Anonymous December 14, 2009 6:58 pm

Anonymous December 14, 2009 7:27 pm

stop being crying babys and accept the fact this stuff goes on. if he'd have gotten away with it you would all be calling him a hero and thats sick.
Dalma December 14, 2009 7:30 pm

Don't worry, Dupuy will probably take a much longer ban that "evil" springboks...
RichW December 14, 2009 7:37 pm

I wouldn't be surprised if they were both made an example of - there's not hiding that.
I've read some comments elsewhere about not being able to put the photo of the Attoub gouge into context. I agree to an extent but come on - his finger is knuckle deep, there's no excusing that.
4 months Attoub
6 months Dupuy
John December 14, 2009 7:51 pm

jej December 14, 2009 7:52 pm

Shark Attack December 14, 2009 8:00 pm

After blasting other posts on not knowing there history dont be so stupid to try comment on South Africas' you obviously dont understand any part of it. Domkop
Orbital December 14, 2009 8:01 pm

Orbital December 14, 2009 8:01 pm

Gavin December 14, 2009 8:02 pm

It is usual that the Ulster players don't sing Amhrann na bhFiann if they don't want to - nobody in Ireland has any problems about that. Although if you actually hear the Ireland players singing, it would probably be better if none of them sang any of the songs...
Jonno December 14, 2009 8:04 pm

Mike December 14, 2009 8:07 pm

an anonymous poster said that sneaky dirty teams like South Africa (his words) were always from countries that are uselsess in wars. I was pointing out that the only war I know that 'South Africa' lost was the Boer war against the British, so they could hardly be considered 'useless' in wars.
If I knew I would be insulted by a South African for defending South Africa, I probably wouldn't have bothered.
Shark Attack December 14, 2009 8:24 pm

Anyway dont mean to sound so aggressive I took your comment out of context my apologies
Mike December 14, 2009 8:31 pm

No problem - I hope the post I was answering has been removed. Thanks for the background too.
Alexander December 14, 2009 8:33 pm

Seriously, awful, and VERY DANGEROUS behaviour; why do pros think its acceptable?!!!!
Anonymous December 14, 2009 9:18 pm

John F December 14, 2009 9:21 pm

Shouldn't 3 months be the lower end of the scale then? Going up to 6 months possibly? I don't buy the "in the heat of the moment" argument, most of the time it is a calculate tactic and here he had the composure to go back for a second gouge. Dupuy's career has been going places the last two years but they need to show an example of ALL the players who gouge. There has clearly been an inconsistency in the bans handed out.
A player who shed some light on this was John Danielli, I don't know if anyone remembers him in NZ, I think he played most of his club rugby in France. In 2007 he released a book called Confessions of a Rugby Mercenary in which he explained that in his career up until moving to France he had barely ever had to deal with gouging but in France (where he played with RCF Paris, Perpignan and Montpellier), it was such a regular occurence that he even started doing it himself. He talks about how as a second row in France, he was expected to dominate the opposition in any way possible, this included all sorts of foul play. Just this weekend Mela of Brive should have been sent off for a punch (he's already had two bans in the last two years and France still hasn't shaken off it's reputation for a good "bagarre" pretty often.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Inside-French-Rugby-Confessions-Mercenary/dp/0958275017/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1260824965&sr=1-2
Anonymous December 14, 2009 9:30 pm

Mehow December 14, 2009 9:36 pm

Pretty stupid of Dupuy though, putting your fingers anywhere near another players eyes is asking for trouble.
Jack December 14, 2009 9:45 pm

Careless? There was NOTHING careless about it. He took GREAT care about what he did, even looking for where the referee was...
Oh, and Ferris IS one of the best number 6s in the world. He is the best in Ireland, Scotland, Wales and England. Not my opinion, the opinion of the British Lions coaching team, who know a lot more than me about rugby.
Mike December 14, 2009 10:02 pm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8xdOX5iNkC8&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-tB7VRYvmiA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-tB7VRYvmiA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UM1WBt9C01E
Some of the same stuff here, but check out the hand-off at 2:19 - who is that weakling he smashes out of his way? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UM1WBt9C01E
View Videos
Anonymous December 14, 2009 10:07 pm

Anonymous December 14, 2009 10:16 pm

Anonymous December 14, 2009 10:19 pm

Anonymous December 14, 2009 10:30 pm

Anonymous December 14, 2009 10:38 pm

FrankyH December 14, 2009 10:39 pm

FrankyH December 14, 2009 10:46 pm

Good one :)
Cameron Maxted December 14, 2009 10:57 pm

they cheat
Huh!! the 3rd December 14, 2009 11:09 pm

In all the on feild fighting and shit that went on in the old days, gouging was unacceptable then and only a few ever did it in scrums when there was no chance of being caught. Disgraceful and needs to be punished heavily.
Dylan Hartley got 6 months, but that was because he'd already been cited before for gouging. I think thats the longest, but Dupuy going in for seconds doesn't help. Ferris' face afterwards is all the evidence needed. Think Roncero is lucky to escape without being cited for punching aswell, this kinda over shadows it.
Mike December 14, 2009 11:20 pm

Huh!! the 3rd December 14, 2009 11:25 pm

Crab people, crab people,
Walks like crab,
talks like people.
Gavin December 14, 2009 11:28 pm

That would be the game where Ferris scored the winning try for the Lions? So he didn't dominate him that much really, did he? :)
Brussow is a top player though, I agree.
Jack December 14, 2009 11:40 pm

Seems like a likeable guy. Wouldn't want to be tackled by him though.
Jack December 14, 2009 11:42 pm

and add "article5865566.ece" at the end.
number7 December 14, 2009 11:49 pm

mise December 15, 2009 12:05 am

Without doubt, both deserve long bans, thou not sure on the technicalities of photo (only) evidence (if that is the only evidence on this one).
And Ferris is emerging as a real force in the backrow, worldwide. Make no mistake. He was excellent on the Lions tour, b4 injury.
Ireland have more strength in depth in the backrow than anywhere. For him to break into that team, over Munster and Leinster players, is v impressive. M and L have 3 of the last 4 H Cups, and both their backrows are excellent. (Thou 6 doesn't have quite the same competition levels as 7 or as 8 in irl)
jamie December 15, 2009 12:58 am

Tui December 15, 2009 1:09 am

I was amazed at what Burger and the italian number 8 got away with recently. (more so with Burger, because that cheating prick went stright for the eyes).
And PDV's reaction, what a joke. I think it reflects badly on the country as well, if a player from my national team did that I would be disgusted.
Perhaps thats why the rest of the world really hate SA and France in rugby? Not because they are "so good and everyone is jealous" (PDV you puppet).
Maybe its becasue we all know that deep down (not so deep in some circumstances) that they will cheat and play dirty at any opportunity.
AB's for life, back at No.1 where we belong.
No.7 December 15, 2009 3:37 am

hmmm, i've said before its such a surprise that players go in for this somewhat high profile foul play....
I mean, if i knew that there were cameras pointed at me from every angle i'd assume my foul play tactics would be reduced somewhat....maybe im wrong...
but dupuy, i mean, talk about obvious, at least burgers was a bit of a scrap on the ground, and it didnt last all that long....this is at the back of a ruck, eyes on scrum half...then he does something like that?!?
im just so surprised players bother...and to gouge...give someone a punch to the chops, but to go for their eyes?!?!...
Id actually hate it if i played a match and seriously injured someone (blinded them)
Tui December 15, 2009 4:45 am

Congrats on finally getting the Tri-nations back. 3rd time in 14 years? You guys really are amazing (i'm joking btw)
But seriously, you lost to Ireland and France (not to mention two club teams).
Your a joke.... and as for your typical racist little comment...
Why do you think you all end up moving to Australia and New Zealand?
You shouldn't throw stones if you live in a glass house brother.
AB's Number 1.
Brussow is a midget December 15, 2009 4:49 am

Wake me up when he gets involved in the play apart from sometimes turning over the ball at the break down.
Just another SA hack who you all hype up.
Just like Spies... No wonder you call him superman, he turns invisable every time he slips the SA jumper on.
Jon December 15, 2009 4:57 am

It's not his fault some South African fans are jerks.
Jamie December 15, 2009 6:31 am

Now there is video evidence.
2 x eye gouging incidents in 1month. BAN HIM.
FrankyH December 15, 2009 7:37 am

And yeah, Brussow is pretty good, but I'd rather have an inform Burger on my side.
But whatever - this isn't about SA. I am ashamed by some of our d*ckhead fans who comment on here sometimes. I suspect it's the same loser causing trouble every time actually.
Tui, NZ aren't squeaky clean themselves bud. Richard Loe anyone? He got 6 months for eye-gouging if I remember correctly. And then lets not forget that the Burger incident finally got the NH guys to stop talking about Tana Umaga & BOD. That'll come up again sometime though, I'm sure of it ;)
Anyway, I'm still shocked and appalled by how blatant and deliberate this was.. twice.
I almost feel like I want some footage to be produced that shows that he didn't actually make contact with the eyes. Then at least my faith in humanity will be restored.
Jonas December 15, 2009 7:58 am

3-0
Springboks #1
Oh and name impostering is the lowest form of wit.
Tui December 15, 2009 8:50 am

In all seriousness though, Yep you do have the cup for Now and you have the Tri-nations for this year (both well deserved) so those are the cups I guess your speaking of.
But our record (apart from World Cups) is superior.
People like you make it worse for other SpringBok fans.... Being proud is not a crime, but being a tool about it is!
And check the irb website brother, there you will see the official ranking if you want to dispute it further.
And to FrankyH, I know that Tana stuff will come up again... We revisit it every end of year tour!! ;-)
Ben December 15, 2009 9:10 am

Brennan was Toulouse's Irish 2nd row that slapped an insulting supporter before an HCup game. He was banned to life from rugby, he can't even be a coach. Recently he tried to appeal the decision to play for a 4th division club in France, but the IRB forbid him.
To me what Dupuy did there is way more serious (even though equally disrespectful to the spirit of the game) than what Trevor did. He could make Ferris blind, and for what ? To spend the 5 remaining minutes of the game without worrying about being Ferris' tacklebag ?
I would absolutely not be shocked if Dupuy got a life ban, this asshole just doesn't deserve to play our sport again ! But I doubt the commissioners will do that
I hope that at least his season is over and that he'll use the rest to think about what an idiot he is !
FLOOZ December 15, 2009 9:16 am

http://www.lequipe.fr/Rugby/breves2009/20091215_094218_le-mea-culpa-de-dupuy.html
According to him, he regrets his action but he still thinks that he didn't really eye-gouge Ferris...
Whatever, erc have already done their choice. i bet on a 5 months ban just in order to make him miss 6nations. Lievremont will be very happy
FLOOZ December 15, 2009 9:24 am

Dupuy's action is coward and nasty
but ur comments are not far from that...
If you are excited by the end of the career of some athletes, ur not very in "the spirit of rugby" as u say. U have some excellents websites with naked women to calm down ur excitation.
Dupuy lost his mind during few seconds and he should forget his career... I wonder how u react to the fact that some players who simulated blood injury or consumed ccoaine will come back on rugby pitch in few months...
He will take the ban that ERC think he deserves. end of the story. end of ur "excitation"
Mike December 15, 2009 10:02 am

What is your opinion?
Jonas December 15, 2009 10:15 am

There is a reason why clint eastwood has made a movie about the Springboks. #1
FrankyH December 15, 2009 10:22 am

A life ban for him would be a bit harsh imo. It's not quite the same as that old photo of Garin Jenkins being worked over by an Argie - pic
But a seriously long ban would be good. Anything less than 6 months wouldn't suffice.
The reality is that this type of thing happens, but not always as blatantly. Mike Phillips did something similar to Pierre Spies in the 1st Test in the Lions series. It wasn't as obvious and was only once, but was difficult to see on camera.
Point is, Dupuy isn't the first guy in the world to do it - a lifeban would be a bit harsh thats all.
FrankyH December 15, 2009 10:25 am

6 months, a year.. even 3 years. But life is a bit OTT.
Jack December 15, 2009 10:28 am

He didn't make the film about Australia either, did he?
6 months for Dupuy - do we all agree? And the same for Attoub?
:)
Anonymous December 15, 2009 10:34 am

Anonymous said...
Anyway Ferris started it by holding Dupuy for no reason.
Ferris and some Ulster players spent their time offside and cheating on rucks, Pearson never took responsibility during this game to penalised Ulster. Therefore Stade Francais got frustrated and Dupuy eye goughed Ferris.
Dupuy will get a lenghty ban and thats fair but French club should pull out of the H cup, and let british and Irish have fun together
as some referrings during the previous heineken games have been appalling.
Anglo saxons players are cheting pussies, except when they play in France, where they praise the passion in our country.
When you cheat at rugby expect to be punish, first by the ref or by the opposing team, in this case Dupuy.
In the end if Pearson had been partial and sanctionned Ultser infrigements (so as Stade) from the begginning it would have never happenned.
December 14, 2009 1:00 PM
you say Ferris started it by holding Dupuy, lol that is such a retarded comment! Holdin is no reason to eye gorge!! The french can't face to be losing and will do nething to win or try and injure their opposition!! SCUM!
FLOOZ December 15, 2009 10:35 am

i don't graduate the gravity of the actions and i certainly don't excuse Dupuy. I hate such coward act on rugby pitchs, eye-gouging are part of!
U have to punish all nasty fouls. But i'm tired with the "fashionnable" sanctions of irb or erc which suddenly punish the first actors and forget the followers.
Eye-gouging seem to be a new phenomenon as it has always existed (and not only in France ;)
shalk burger didn't invent it!
An other time, it will be high tackles (just weirdly cibling islanders players)
Next month, u will have stamping in the rucks (banahan red card is an exception, they are less seen by the referees), before, it was the cathedral tackle...
U will have always a mediatized accident which will change the commision eye.
In 2 months, eye-gougings will be forgotten for a "kick in the nuts" in a maul (very new ;-)),maybe by a prop, a french one? surely
Video allow to watch 90% of the fouls and that's great for rugby. Bu when a camera will see what happen in a scrum, they'll be very surprised :)
FLOOZ December 15, 2009 10:51 am

more original and less dirty :)
Ben December 15, 2009 11:05 am

Of course rugby is a dangerous sport, but that is a deliberate act that could lead to terrible consequences, and should be punished as such.
Sorry if you think that having a bad opinion about eye-gougers make me against the spirit of rugby, but I'm not going on the field every sunday with the hope that I'll make all my opponent's use a cane for the rest of their lives. May be we have a different vision of sportsmanship...
Maybe a life ban is excessive, but to me I don't think slapping a supporter is more serious than eye-gouging a player, it is off topic, but it's a shame that Brennan isn't allowed to go on a field anymore (even though no one cares).
Dupuy doesn't deserve to play until the end of the season to me, sorry if you think otherwise, but that is my opinion.
Anonymous December 15, 2009 11:24 am

Jonas December 15, 2009 11:35 am

No one takes the EYOT seriously, its the same as the spring tours for the NH, they send their lesser players south.
And how about you stop attacking your own countrymen?
Anonymous December 15, 2009 11:39 am

FrankyH December 15, 2009 11:47 am

Jonas, fair enough, but I'm embarrassed by the way some of my countrymen behave here at times, you included. I tell myself it's because they're young kids who don't know how to have adult conversations. I hope that's it anyway.
You lost all credibility with your racist comments, and sound like a tool in general.
What's the point in arguing here about who is the best team?! All you're doing is making us sound like douches, not winners. Winners don't need to rub it in others' faces. Losers do.
paul December 15, 2009 12:21 pm

jay December 15, 2009 12:32 pm

(quick one so not 100%)
I do am aware that my hand is in his eyes...but it's not gouging as my hand is open."
Yet the player admits that it was stupid and illegal.
He's now waiting for the comission, hoping they won't be too severe :
" the video doesn't look good for me, but I'm not really aiming for the eyes (...) I'm not a vicious/ mean guy (...) so I'm hopin it won't be that bad... (/or rather that I will be lucky )
Then it goes on about him apologizing to his team, coach and Ferris himself... while they (him and Attoub) should be heard on thursday...
Again qui translation so not everything is accurate as I tried to give the meaning of the thing rather than a full nice translation.
Anonymous December 15, 2009 12:45 pm

Anonymous December 15, 2009 1:07 pm

The Inside Shoulder December 15, 2009 2:24 pm

There is a reason why clint eastwood has made a movie about the Springboks. #1
----
Yes, it was called Apartheid.
I really hope you were joking.
Eoghan December 15, 2009 2:51 pm

This year for Christmas I would like Dupuy to get a 1 year ban from the game.
Him and that prop.
Thanks,
Eoghan
JK December 15, 2009 3:22 pm

Also, to those that say the French are being unfairly stereotyped as thugs, this wasn't an isolated incident - the Brive team playing this weekend were a disgrace to the game of rugby as well.
Anonymous December 15, 2009 3:51 pm

JPM December 15, 2009 3:53 pm

If you damage a player's eyesight then there is a good chance he will not be able to play. Take someone like Ferris. A young player at the top of the game, with great potential to earn good money for the next 8 years or so. Yet, Dupuy could potentially take all that away from him. Such reckless actions deserve a big ban.
Anonymous December 15, 2009 4:06 pm

Michael December 15, 2009 4:22 pm

Good point.
edelweiss December 15, 2009 4:40 pm

I'm calling it now: a French side will win the next Currie Cup. If they can keep their steam going, maybe they'll even take home the Bledisloe, too!
And FLOOZ, "In 2 months, eye-gougings will be forgotten for a "kick in the nuts" in a maul (very new ;-)),maybe by a prop, a french one? surely"
...Buck Shelford, anyone? ;-)
FLOOZ December 15, 2009 4:45 pm

It is as if dupuy had commited a murder.
As french, i sometimes wonder why french clubs continue to participate to a competition where there are considered like paranoids, thugs, provocated and bad referred..
Just let irish, scottish, english and welsh play their poor pick & go and go back in a 1950's sort of rugby.
a game without eye-gouging, bloodgate or cocaine of course...
FLOOZ December 15, 2009 4:47 pm

i quit this incredible (it's the word) debate (not sure if it's the word)
Ben December 15, 2009 5:07 pm

Imagines une seconde que tu sois la place de Ferris, un jeune international qui a toute sa carrire devant lui. L un mec qui perd ses nerfs pendant un match te fourre le doigt dans l'oeil, oeil crev, infection... Tu perds TOUT, non seulement ta carrire est finie, mais en plus ta vie aussi, tu peux pas avoir de mtier en tant aveugle, t'es oblig de rapprendre vivre, tu ne reconnais plus personne... Un de mes amis est devenu aveugle il y a quelques annes, pas a cause du rugby, mais il tait tudiant en mdecine comme moi, en 2me anne (il avait pass le plus dur...)
On ne peut evidemment pas tre mdecin en tant aveugle, et malheureusement pour lui il a mis fin ses jours aprs 2 ans de dpression...
C'est un cas extrme certes, mais ce qu' fait Dupuy aurait pu tre bien plus grave, il aurait pu briser la vie de Ferris. Evidemment comme je l'ai dit avant, le rugby est un sport dangereux, tous les ans des jeunes finissent paraplgique suite un accident, mais ce sont des accidents, l c'tait une tentative dlibre de nuire. Je ne dis pas qu'on a pas le droit de perdre ses nerfs, personne n'est parfait, moi-mme j'en suis loin mais il aurait du se contenter de lui mettre un coup de poing dans la machoire, qu'il aurait cass au pire des cas.
Tu dois toujours penser que je suis qu'un petit con qui devrait aller calmer sa colre sur des sites pornos, pas grave... Mais sache que s'attaquer aux yeux de quelqu'un peut aller bien plus loin que ce que tu penses, et que Dupuy mrite d'tre loign des terrains cette saison (je pense que t'avais compris ce point) au moins, mme s'il n'a pas bless Ferris l'intention y tait...
Jack December 15, 2009 5:25 pm

The reason we think that some French people are paranoid about the referees etc. in the Heineken Cup is because every time something goes wrong, they go "it's because they hate the French".
When Shane Jennings got a long ban for 'gouging', a lot of people thought it was unfair (especially as the victim said it was not really gouging), but nobody said 'it's because he's Irish!'. When Munster lost a chance to wind the Heineken Cup in the last 2 minutes against Northampton because Neil Back cheated, Munster fans were annoyed and blamed Back, but we did not say 'they cheat us because we are Irish'! When a referee makes a bad decision, we do not say 'the referee is biased against the Irish!'.
This is the same for every country, except France. Every country gets what seems like bad referee decisions, bad punishments for players - except for Fingers Burger :) - but it is only SOME French fans who say, 'It is because they hate France!!'.
This makes French fans look paranoid. I think it would be very sad if French rugby withdrew from the rest of the world - bad for rugby in France and everywhere else. Perhaps you remember how Enlgish football clubs were the best in Europe in the 70s and 80s until they were banned from European competition for 5 years after the Heysel stadium disaster. It took 20 years for English teams to recover to the top level in Europe.
Like other posters here have said, I enjoy French rugby a lot and like to watch the French team. However, I do not like the 'victim' mentality of some French rugby people - I hope this can change.
edelweiss December 15, 2009 5:35 pm

No, they penned it down in the Munster playbook for Quinlan to try out 3 years later ;)
Jack December 15, 2009 5:50 pm

I don't remember that! Anyway, referees hate Munster... :)
edelweiss December 15, 2009 6:19 pm

http://rugbydump.blogspot.com/2009/11/alan-quinlan-attempts-to-replicate-hand.html
Hanvey December 15, 2009 9:06 pm

Mike December 15, 2009 9:45 pm

Cheers!
1950's Superstar December 15, 2009 10:54 pm

LOL at the stupidity of that comment mate. Why don't you just have a look at the Quins v Sale highlights or the Leinster v Sacrlets. Yes, leave us to our pick and go 1950s rugby, I'm certain we would survive without you :))))
No.7 December 15, 2009 11:33 pm

I've noticed the more you comment the more likely someone is at getting upset.
This leads to people pretending to be you and leaving stupid comments.
Who knows, it could have been flooz or it might have been someone who is arguing with him/her and cant win....
Jon December 16, 2009 1:03 am

I do think British refs tend to favor British teams. Whether or not that's due to interpretations that the British teams are used to or not, I don't know. I do believe it happens though.
Equally I think French teams still have some discipline issues.
Clearly there's something wrong at a club that has two guys gouging the same opposition player in one ruck. That's a horrible lack of discipline and fair play.
Disgraceful in fact.
troy December 16, 2009 2:13 am

And it isn't confined to the French either.
But I also agree with Jack, the victim mentality of both the French and the Bok fans, which have both got a run on here, gets a bit pathetic.
Myer is My Store December 16, 2009 5:11 am

Three apologies!!! One each from the players and one from the club! If ever there was an admission of guilt masked as an apology! Cut their losses and show remorse now before the officials doom them! Thierry Henry did the same...
Anonymous December 16, 2009 2:15 pm

No.7 December 16, 2009 3:36 pm

lol, peter de villiers will be sending ferris a tutu for christmas!
Tui December 16, 2009 11:16 pm

SA has only become a threat recently after winning the 07 WC... Even then you couldn't back it up in 08 tri-nations against an Allblacks team in serious rebuilding and 09 you only just managed it with probably your greatest team of all time (which are a great team no doubt).
The reason the movie "Invictus" has been made goes way past rugby and is based around Nelson Mandelas attempts to fix up your country....
Don't get to far ahead of yourself Jonas, you and your little Brussow cheer squad need to step into reality.
Nicko December 16, 2009 11:27 pm

JONAS you are a muppet who probably lives in Aus/NZ/UK anyway.
Brussow is terrible, had 1 good game for the Saffas against NZ and went missing the next week and got consistantly pinged for being offside a off his feet.
He did a couple of good things against the Lions... but who cares, the lions never do sh*t anyway.
How many tests has that midget played? I sware I saw him cry against the Lions anyway...
We would much rather face brussow than Burger, so keep him comming lads!!
franny1807 December 17, 2009 3:42 pm

To all the people calling the Fench cowards? You have to be shitting me?! The French are the toughest customers around.
Also this Saturdays's re-match is gonna be the biggest boxing match ever.
Anonymous December 18, 2009 4:03 pm

Since I'm french + from Paris I am - for sure - very partial but I can't help to think that's a bit harsh.
However, let's hope that will send a clear message to our beautifull sport that manners still count.
Flooz December 18, 2009 4:09 pm

Arnaud Mela, Brive, french > 7 weeks for a kick on an opponent
Guillaume Ribes, Brive, french > 4 weeks for a kick on an opponent
Julien Dupuy, Stade Franais, french, 6 months, for eye-gouging accusation (Burger took 12 weeks for the same action)
David Attoub, Stade Franais, french, audition postponed to january, the photo which was the basis of the accusation of eye-gouging is maybe a photo-montage
Tommy bowe, ospreys, irish, free to play
I let u quietly meditate on all these decisions. cheers :)
Julien December 18, 2009 4:36 pm

What Dupuy did was ignominious, he deserved a harsh punishment, 12 or even 16 weeks would have been deserved, but the difference in treatment between him together with the other french players and the other nation players is appalling.. No wonder french fans get paranoid...
Consistency is the key in any sentencing policy. in rule of law professionnals know that the law and its enforcers lose the respect of the people when this consistency disappears, because it can lead to accusations of bias, racism, class discrimination, etc...
In rugby it is less dramatic but still. If this sentence stands I sure hope from know a english prop who floors cold a romanian prop for a french club will get a lenghty ban too...
consistency.
fluff December 18, 2009 5:06 pm

Anonymous December 18, 2009 5:07 pm

Kearney for tests December 18, 2009 5:38 pm

I don't see why people are complaining. I mean he gouged him twice. He even held Ferris' head back so he could get a better angle. Despicable. I think he deserved a year.
No.7 December 18, 2009 6:54 pm

Im not a lions fan but i wanted them to win the series. definately not an SA fan, but burgers gouge was on a different level....
burger grabbed his face, and i assume gouged, made contact with the eye area.
what we saw here was dupuy make small contact, look to see the ref, then do it again much worse....
i think the fact the other stade players contribution also will not help dupuy's case as it makes it look more planned!!
mise December 18, 2009 7:07 pm

Jennings' ban was completely OTT, but in light of the new, post-Burger reality, bans like this are how it will be from now on.
IF players can't see that, they've been gouged (metaphorically).
Can't wait to see the adjourned ban in January for the Stade prop....world record ban coming???
(well. apart from drug or fan attacking bans)
Javier December 18, 2009 7:57 pm

You're comparing a double-eye-gouge to a dangerous tackle?
The way the citing commission has been handing out weird bans, I wouldn't have been surprised to see Bowe get suspended, but in no way did Dupuy not deserve the ban he received.
If it makes you feel any better, Danny Care was recently suspended for a dangerous tackle.
I'm hoping Attoub gets nothing, since there's only a picture and that's not evidence enough, in my opinion.
Ah yesa December 18, 2009 8:15 pm

Javier December 18, 2009 8:38 pm

Actually, I was surprised to find out all that the IRB DO compare gouging with:
http://www.ercrugby.com/images/content/cupstandard/IRB_Sanctions.pdf
"Testicle grabbing or twisting or squeezing" - glad we don't see that one often.
Also, Flooz, it's not an "eye-gouging accusation"...it's an eye-gouging fact. Are you really going to dispute that he didn't gouge him?
Anonymous December 18, 2009 11:01 pm

"I hope there is an appeal and that the ban is replaced by something more reasonable."
So does he actually want a longer ban? Because that's what is more reasonable! He tried to blind the guy!
Anonymous December 18, 2009 11:04 pm

muh? December 19, 2009 6:54 pm

Anonymous December 19, 2009 10:33 pm

The most funny thing into the posts is that most English posters are trying to explain to the French (the minority) that they are the only anglo-saxons in GB.
Then, we can read comments, F**** clver by the way, about the wars won and lost by some countries through our history.
The rivalry between France and England is definitely not over. Just pitiful, the bloody old clichs are keeping alive, both People will go on hatingf each other on the only field they can fight each other : Sport. And there, the neo-academic suckers can count with which nations France and England fought over the past 10 centuries, they will surely find a genetical explanation to this.
We all love rugby, whenever we are French, English or Australians. Dupuy deserves 6 months, not because he wears a pink shirt, simply because he went against the integrity of our sport.
Anonymous December 20, 2009 9:12 am

GRugs December 20, 2009 9:14 am

This guy 2 above me said the best thing i have read so far for this video. Its true!















Commenting as Guest | Register or Login