Tuesday, July 13, 2010
Classic Kapo O Pango Haka against the Springboks at Eden Park
Opinions have always varied about the relevance of the pre-match wardance in this day and age. Many say its outdated, while others say it gives them an unfair advantage and shouldnt be allowed. I happen to think the opposite, and know that some of the best players in world have welcomed the challenge, sometimes thriving in standing up to it.
It seems strange to talk about good Hakas and bad Hakas, but the reality is that there have been times when it has come across routine and lacklustre. Its certainly come a long way since its early days - as you can watch in the History of Rugby series here on RD - but on Saturday there seemed to be something special about it.
Piri Weepu, despite playing off the bench, has become a worthy leader of the Haka after they had toyed with Richie McCaw leading it last year. McCaw himself has said that some of them get together and choose which Haka theyll perform at random during the week leading up to a Test.
There seems to be more to it than that though, and Im sure it was no coincidence that their second Haka, to many a more fearsome sight than the Ka Mate, was pulled out for the big clash at the start of the Tri Nations. There was a definite edge to it.
Whatever the case, it was fantastic to watch, and has been requested so here it is for you to watch and decide for yourself if its one of the better ones youve seen, or not.
Posted at 6:47 pm | 80 comments
|
|
Viewing 80 comments
Anonymous July 13, 2010 8:07 pm

Scotsdale July 13, 2010 8:10 pm

Good one, thanks!
Jimbo July 13, 2010 8:35 pm

Anonymous July 13, 2010 8:51 pm

Anonymous July 13, 2010 9:02 pm

Anonymous July 13, 2010 9:04 pm

They're increasing the capacity for the world cup i believe, and that part is under construction..
Anonymous July 13, 2010 9:14 pm

Anonymous July 13, 2010 9:44 pm

the beardy robot could have been a socks and sandals wearing one
good to see it was a goodie.
MonkeyOnKeyboard July 13, 2010 9:59 pm

Jacko July 13, 2010 10:34 pm

Bokke_2007 July 13, 2010 10:42 pm

Jono July 13, 2010 11:19 pm

People who whigne about it are a joke. It's been around longer than these whingers have been alive and will be around long after they're dead.
It's one of rugby's great traditions and a part of it's history.
And while the English invented rugby, it was the Kiwis who taught everyone how to play it properly.
Mart July 13, 2010 11:19 pm

is it done in a little rehearsal studio?
I've had my dig, that said...still impressive!!
Anonymous July 14, 2010 1:26 am

Anonymous July 14, 2010 1:32 am

"No, no, no it's two chest slaps, little squat, and THEN leg slaps"
"Ritchie your all out of rythim, and Dan TRY to keep up this time all right boys one more time, but this time with FEELING."
Anonymous July 14, 2010 1:36 am

"Hmm, lets see, who am I going to headbutt."
Anonymous July 14, 2010 2:44 am

That's just the begging sweetheart... I cant wait to see the Bok come last this tri-nations, it will be hilarious!!
New laws = Goodnight bokkles
Anonymous July 14, 2010 2:49 am

Anonymous July 14, 2010 3:00 am

Bokke_2007 July 14, 2010 3:40 am

poitier July 14, 2010 3:45 am

I thought this Kapo o Pango was a bit boring, but who cares - if that's my attitude, then it's not performed for me. It's done for the players and the people who are interested in seeing it.
I like it when the haka gets challenged, but that doesn't mean I think it should be done away with.
Tommy July 14, 2010 4:09 am

The stadium is undergoing renovations for the upcoming world cup. That part of the stadium is not in use at the moment while it's reconstructed.
Tommy July 14, 2010 4:18 am

It's usually someone from Britain or rieland complaining, and it ahs everything to do witht he fact that NZ regularly beat them, and nothing to do with the actual advantage (pretty close to sweet fuck all from a scientific perspective) provided to them.
As evidence, notice that they never complain when the Tongans, Samoans or Fijians do their triabl dance before a match.
These moaners are also usually exponents of one or more of these gems:
- SH teams have terrible defence at S14 level (which mysteriously improves at national level or any time SH teams play northern hemisphere teams, for unexplained reasons)
- The Lions should have won in South Africa, and were the better team (despite losing, conventionally seen as an indicator of which team has preformed better)
- O'Gara is a fantastic fly half
- The Heineken Cup is "more intense" or has "better atmosphere" than the S14 (just try not to focus on the low skill levels or lack of ambition)
- Any rule changed proposed by the IRB or any reffing directive from the IRB is in actual fact a conspiracy concoted by the dastardly (and amazingly influential apparently) Australians to change the game to rugby league (for completely unexplained reasons) supported by the Kiwis and Saffers (also for unexplained reasons)
Project_Tyranny July 14, 2010 4:43 am

It is by far the most intense and frightening haka, and it is the most fun to watch.
I know right now the Timitanga is exclusive to the NZ Maori, but i think in the 21st century, the Haka is now more of a crowd pleaser than an ESSENTIAL part of NZ rugby. The All Blacks would still play amazing without the Haka. It is more tradition for the fans and spectators. On that note, the Timitanga is the GREATEST Haka, and I would love the see the AB's doing it next year at the world cup, particularly against France (because I will be at that game :)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8PcmHqwP7Ow
Andrew July 14, 2010 5:43 am

The Haka or Kapa o panga or any South Sea Island war cry before the game is a tradition. Every International Player that stands and faces this tradition has respect for the meaning. It is tradition this is rugby...Long live Rugby.
Go Bokke
Anonymous July 14, 2010 5:54 am

A Haka to those performing it is just as relative as their anthem, if not more so.
If you want to get rid of pre-game hakas I hope you also want rid of anthems.
Anonymous July 14, 2010 6:05 am

Social construction July 14, 2010 7:24 am

Jono July 14, 2010 7:39 am

It also ignores that fact that the maori were a warrior people and proud of it.
That doesn't necessarely make them savage and bloodthirsty.
Besides, isn't that for them to decide, rather than you and I?
Hi Ho July 14, 2010 7:50 am

Now for those of you who can put your hatred of league to one side, check out this awesome vision from the 2008 RL world cup final.... a very enjoyable haka experience:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UuXmk4tVoSE
Unfortunately the Kiwis played above themselves that night and delivered a massive upset, so you could say standing up to the haka in this way backfired on this occasion... but still unreal to watch.
View Video
Social construction July 14, 2010 7:52 am

As such my query is whether this choice of representation does not simply reinforce broader (ignorant) narratives of the Other as savage, bloodthirsty etc etc. Thereby exacerbating the same ignorance which is at the heart of making the performance of the Haka a potential problem.
I think from my concerns about this that you would understand me not to be a proponent of such a simple interpretation.
Simon7 July 14, 2010 8:16 am

Leeners93 July 14, 2010 10:24 am

David July 14, 2010 11:08 am

......We've always known he's a total liability.
LOL.
Anonymous July 14, 2010 12:09 pm

Anybody who doesn't want the haka is probably not much of a sporting type, and if it bores you then you're likely emotionally dead.
Social construction July 14, 2010 12:26 pm

Sure there is no need for discussion here. We can just ask the Maori (all of them, they'll all agree, i'm sure). And besides the objects of representation always know what's materially best for them, they pretty much have the monopoly on knowledge. That's why women consent to being exploited in sexualised images, why black groups have overcome racial stereotypes regarding crime, drug use and violence and why France is busy banning the veil.
Anonymous July 14, 2010 12:33 pm

Anonymous July 14, 2010 12:35 pm

Alot like that combatbok character on youtube... They get overly excited and then disappear for a while... lol
Laz July 14, 2010 12:41 pm

Anywaaay.. love the haka. I'm always amazed when people genuinely dislike it.
NiWiTa July 14, 2010 12:56 pm

You are of course right on O'Gara - no doubt as an England supporter I can look forward to Martin Johnson asking him to become an Englishman and fill our inside centre position.
Must admit to liking the rugby league a lot too - does mean I am becoming Australian....
Andymo July 14, 2010 1:25 pm

What an utterly ridiculous and false statement.
Hows this one:
"Slave trading and slave owning was a part of European, African and Arab culture therefore to criticise slave owning is to be bigoted."
"Egyptian female circumcision is a customer and therefore above criticism."
I'm not criticising the Haka (which I like), I'm criticising your moral relativism. And if the Haka is indeed an advantage, then host countries have the right to deny the All Blacks their dance (as Wales did).
Andymo July 14, 2010 1:26 pm

What an utterly ridiculous and false statement.
Hows this one:
"Slave trading and slave owning was a part of European, African and Arab culture therefore to criticise slave owning is to be bigoted."
"Egyptian female circumcision is a custom and therefore above criticism."
I'm not criticising the Haka (which I like), I'm criticising your moral relativism. And if the Haka is indeed an advantage, then host countries have the right to deny the All Blacks their dance (as Wales did).
Andrew July 14, 2010 1:28 pm

I hear where you are coming from, but did you also know that the Haka,
whether it be Ka Ma Te or Kapo o pango, the cry has to be led by a Maori on the field. No White/European can lead the team in the Cry. So my guess is that the Maori people dont mind and that they are just as proud of their All Blacks as any New Zealander
Social construction July 14, 2010 1:56 pm

I think that you're probably right regarding the Maori people not minding and being as proud of their All Blacks as any New Zealander.
Does anyone know if any of this has been debated in New Zealand? I am sure that there must be some critical Maori scholarship on this.
ConnachtFan July 14, 2010 3:03 pm

Some of you critics have too much time on your hands....go troll elsewhere please.
that's what she July 14, 2010 3:37 pm

Joey July 14, 2010 3:50 pm

And Social, you're seriously asking on rugbydump.com whether there has been "critical Maori scholarship" on the haka?? Get over yourself. It's a terrific and unique tradition and yes, it's been debated in NZ, and will continue to be.
David July 14, 2010 4:32 pm

Rigby July 14, 2010 4:40 pm

Everybody loves watching the haka, except for the 22 men 10 yards opposite it.
Alexander July 14, 2010 5:22 pm

Bigots are everywhere, don't have a go at a whole continent and say such narrow-minded, BIGOTED nonsense!!!!
P.S. Why this debate on the Haka. Who cares!! Long live it!!
JK July 14, 2010 5:28 pm

Jimbo July 14, 2010 9:07 pm

Along with the other NH members on here I think we all agree that the Haka is awesome and should never be removed from the rugby experience. As for it being an advantage it hasn't really done New Zealand any favours when it comes to the most important event of the WC. I think NZ fans have a bit of a problem with England as we always perform better than expected in the WC instead of choking horribly and having to go home early. Be interesting to see what happens next year as they (NZ) have an amazing side that at the moment seems unstoppable. Hopefully it'll be a little bit more exciting than the Football WC which was s**t!!!
Please no more 'our hemisphere is better than your hemisphere'. Rugby = respect
Scotsdale July 14, 2010 9:15 pm

That said though, I agree that there shouldnt be bickering between us. There's no point. Sort it out on the field. As you can see now too, the SH rivalry is so intense anyway. There's not much solidarity between NZ and SA right now!
mise July 15, 2010 1:45 am

Europeans see it, for the most part, as entertaining.
Is it not the case that rugby as a practice is just as, lets call it old skool, as the Haka.........physical prowess, men only, managed fighting, respect for mega hits, a sneeky culture of eye gouging, stamping, etc, and of course essentially a battle ...involving a projectile........ that's targeted at enemy turf?
Doesn't rugby as a sport mimic tribal battles in a _relatively_ safe way, and thus hark back to earlier times
e.g. (again from the history vids) of that 'sport' where the ball was essentially beaten to a village by a pair of villages, more or less performing as a mob?
Or more tribal fights or practices for fights from earlier times?
Tommy July 15, 2010 2:56 am

Most Australians love the haka, or just jokingly tease the Kiwis about it.
They're our cousins (There's about a billion of them living in Aus).
Australia has never treated the haka disrespectfully.
All the bs and whinging emanates from the British Irish teams, like Wales.
All the media garbage about it being an advantage emanates from there too.
Tommy July 15, 2010 2:59 am

The majority of hakas are not about that at all, and the ka mate haka isn't a war chant as such.
Look into it.
And to clarify, I don't think the majority of Europeans have a problem with it, in fact as you say it seems the majority think it's great entertainment.
Us Aussies have seen it more than you guys, so we don't get too excited by it anymore.
But it's like any old tradition for us, we have an admiration for it and just take it as a given that it's a part of rugby and the All Blacks.
Steak July 15, 2010 8:39 am

"Seems to be mostly Oz fans who dislike the haka, probably for neighbourly/big country small country/convict/colony reasons......(i.e. look at those uppity little neighbours of ours, who haven't tamed their natives.....)"
That's hilarious. Don't confuse your myopic little opinion for fact.
(u-p)rick July 15, 2010 10:47 am

I think they add something a little different to the game...much like bakkies style of playing... (oops, sorry was that below the belt..?.)....(or above the neck?)
I think though its a classic part of rugby and the only way I'd like to see it gone would be if the AB's themselves decided not to do it....Id rather there wasn't some 'new legislation' tripe which stopped it....
Put it this way, the game is for fun, the haka is 'fun' to watch...so it would only be detrimental to remove it...
mise July 15, 2010 4:03 pm

No one else does this, and it stems from the relationship between the two countries re scale colonial history etc.
Scale and neighbourly issue is much like the Irish and the Brits, the Finnish and the Russians, Canadians and Americans etc etc.
"Australia has never treated the haka disrespectfully." Oh pl-ease. Campo anyone?
The fact is: the only people you hear mocking it are Aussies.
(one mans joking tease is another mans....)
Jono July 15, 2010 10:55 pm

Australia and New Zealand are intertwinend, politically, culturally, economically.
They are our cousins, they fought and died beside us in many wars, and our rivalry (which is very real) is based on mutual respect, heavily flavoured with alot of taking the piss out of each other. But there's isn't any hate, and certainly no disrespect.
And Campo wasn't being disrespectful, at least not the way he would look at it. He was doing a bit of gamesmanship. Bear in mind that Campo isn't exactly a conformer and not very popular and certainly doesn't represent the country of Australia.
Besides which, you can respond to the haka any way you like. That's not the problem. The problem is people whinging about it's existance, and using that as an excuse for getting beaten by the All Blacks.
EARugbyFan July 16, 2010 12:08 am

I would love to see the Boks perform a Zulu version, for example.
The thing that bothers me, though, is that there have been instances where opposing teams "responded" to the haka by stepping forward, as an example and the Kiwis whinged, which I found pathetic.
Yes. It IS intimidating. Yes we RESPECT your cultural (Hell, I am not from New Zealand but regard it as a bonafide rugby custom, since I was a kid) But expecting absolutely no response from your opponents is quite hypocritical.
EARugbyFan July 16, 2010 12:20 am

(Believe me, this has pissed me off to no end over the years... I am an All Blacks Fan, as my native country will not see a 15s world cup in the foreseeable future.)
As for their success last weekend, colour me skeptical (peaking issues... there is a lot that can happen between now and that final).
Tommy July 16, 2010 2:27 am

In that instance Nonu was contradicted by all his other team mates and many people in his country, who expressed the opposite feelings as him, ie that the response was not only fine but a good way to handle the haka.
EARugbyFan July 16, 2010 6:42 am

Cheers.
Scotsdale July 16, 2010 8:33 am

Re. Nonu - he's known to be a sook over there anyway. Don't pay attention to what he has to say.
Otago Uni July 16, 2010 10:54 am

Pato July 16, 2010 1:10 pm

Anonymous July 17, 2010 1:48 am

Alexander July 18, 2010 1:19 am

jono July 18, 2010 11:18 pm

We boo whatever we feel like, it's all just for fun. You guys can make a big deal out of putting the opposition kicker off, we won't though.
It's just not a big deal.
Alexander July 19, 2010 9:45 am

NiWiTa July 19, 2010 12:39 pm

The point for me about all rugby is the sharing of a team bond and mutual respect between teams. Just as I enjoy the HAKA, I also enjoy the sportsmanship of playing the game in the right spirit. To attract and grow our wonderful sport we need to differentiate ourselves from soccer/american football and so on....
Anyhow long live the HAKA - just you wait till the England team respond with a Morris Dancing exhibition! Then ABs will be runnign scared of us!
Jono July 20, 2010 6:59 am

And if you guys are proud of that thing about not booing the kicker, fair enough, down south it would simply never occur to us to do that.
Anonymous July 20, 2010 7:19 am

mise July 22, 2010 11:35 pm

@ aabot : can't u guess from my previous posts?!?!
I presume its obvious that I have zero problem with the Haka btw
Re the Ozzies and the haka:
I'm simply honestly reflecting what I've heard over the years on fora, in conversation, from tv commentators, and yes occasionally even here re Ozzies and the Haka, and then extrapolating based on other (more sociological and political science orientated) knowledge on cultural relations between peoples. I know that sounds pompous on a forum like this, but that is my background (training-wise).
Now, I'm glad that many ppl from Oz have jumped to the defence of the Haka and Kiwis more generally, as there has to be some empathic overlap between the cultures.
But to presume that empathy is the only significant relationship would be naive.
Favourite Haka: both of them in Thomond Park in 2008.
surely that gives away where I live...........















Commenting as Guest | Register or Login