Sunday, November 14, 2010
England outpace the Wallabies at Twickenham
Their were signs of great things to come a week ago when going down valiantly to New Zealand, but this time around there was no doubt that this may well be a new era for English rugby as they mixed their power up front with an expansive style of play.
Fullback Ben Foden has insisted its worth keeping their feet on the ground at this stage however. "Legends aren't made out of one result," he said.
"We need to keep working and getting better and better and hopefully by the time the World Cup comes around we will be there or thereabouts. It was a pretty convincing win and we can be pretty happy with the sort of rugby we played," Foden added.
Wallaby coach Robbie Deans, whose team came into the match following wins over the All Blacks and Wales, said that he could see a big game from England on the horizon.
"I have seen it growing in this England side. They played better against the All Blacks but were frustrated with where they got to. They will take a lot out of it," Deans said.
"They are broadening their game and had success with it against us. They took initiatives in speeding up the game that worked for them," he added.
England scrumhalf Ben Youngs had an outstanding game, as did Chris Ashton, who scored two fantastic tries. The second of which was started by Youngs behind their own tryline, with dynamic lock Courtney Lawes then drawing two men before releasing Ashton. The Saints flyer then put in an incredible 90m sprint to score a sensational try.
"The southern hemisphere teams have to take us seriously. That was our main aim to put ourselves up there and make sure we're competing with the big boys. That's what we've gone out to do. We've put down a marker now," said Foden.
Sponsored by: Rucking Insurance | Advertise here with a sponsored post
Rucking Insurance takes care of health insurance for rugby players in the US. If you're looking for coverage so that you can play this great sport and still feel safe, get in touch now.
Find out more
Posted at 10:32 pm | 120 comments
|
|
Viewing 120 comments
Anonymous November 14, 2010 10:07 pm

Douglas November 14, 2010 10:15 pm

Mike November 14, 2010 10:23 pm

Chris November 14, 2010 10:24 pm

England ran riot. Great to see them performing so well, it's been a while.
Kurtley beale had a decent game though.
Ulf November 14, 2010 10:26 pm

I can't help but notice that when O'Connor has a day off, Australia loses.
Anonymous November 14, 2010 10:28 pm

sorry england were immense but that gave me the craps big time
Box November 14, 2010 10:28 pm

Anonymous November 14, 2010 11:10 pm

Tu November 14, 2010 11:10 pm

To be fair though, the Wallabies at times can be their own worst enemy...
Anonymous November 14, 2010 11:16 pm

It wasn't without fault, but in the right direction.
Now lets see what they do against SA, else this was a one off and doesn't matter.
Anonymous November 14, 2010 11:25 pm

if you look he is tackled by Flood, Tindall and Palmer. They all stay on their feet during the tackle,apart from Palmer, who is over turned by australian players joining the ruck. But the ball was over turned. From what i understand this is allowed.
slippery pete November 14, 2010 11:28 pm

England also, for the first time in a very long time, looked to have an actual game plan. They seemed to have actually planned for set running lines depending on the situation, and it worked out for them. Dunno why people tend give Tindall a hard time, he played excellently, breaking the gainline on pretty much every occasion.
On a somewhat unrelated note, why is it Rod Kafer seems to be the only one in the Wallabies booth who seems to know what's going on? Maybe he ought to have Robbie Deans job...
Goombator November 14, 2010 11:34 pm

It's quite impressive.
Hope France will show something the two next tests or we can start to worry about the 6N, and most the WC.
Anonymous November 14, 2010 11:41 pm

Anonymous November 15, 2010 12:01 am

Anonymous November 15, 2010 12:10 am

and poor old mark webber didn't win the F1 either
shame you don't have the honestly just to admit the better team won on the day
Gavin November 15, 2010 12:14 am

Seriously, that was a good performance from England. O'Connor's misses probably cost Aus in the end, but he'll learn from that and be stronger in future. The more I see Beale, the more I like him.
mise November 15, 2010 12:16 am

Amazing step by 9 to lead to that try - and was 14 smiling from miles out?!? Looked that way.
All of a sudden, England seem miles ahead of Ireland for the 6N.
Ireland, on the other hand, seem to be taking, as usual, the exact opposite trajectory to England re World Cups - brilliant the year after one (e.g. after the one England won, Ireland went to England and slaughtered them -scoring an amazing full length of the pitch try themselves). They were also brilliant last year.
Now, just when they need it, they seem to be running out of gas.
Third Centre November 15, 2010 12:35 am

Ashton's second was class
secondfive November 15, 2010 12:49 am

Of the 3N sides on tour the Aussies, with their youth and erratic pack, were likely to be the most brittle and when Eng hit the ground running and then surprisingly kept going, it was catch-up rugby for a team that wasn't firing. The Oz backs can be brilliant but they need to get the ball and preferably to get it going forward. Pocock is the only definite World XV guy in the Oz pack and never plays badly but the Eng pack all played well and gave their backs plenty of ball and on the front foot.
Personally I think Aus were crucified at the tackle by the ref and I shared their obvious bewilderment at times, but I don't think it changed the result much.
doos November 15, 2010 12:50 am

source November 15, 2010 12:56 am

Anonymous November 15, 2010 1:32 am

scrums have become a farce, half the time it looks like the ref is guessing who to give the penalty to.
Tane November 15, 2010 1:35 am

It seems England have really embraced the new style of running rugby which is a real joy for us rugby fans to watch. So lets hope more International sides look to run the ball a lot more also, which would make the world cup in my country next year a cracker.
Anonymous November 15, 2010 1:45 am

I think Australia seemed to have not got the right game plan, they didn't have anywhere to target and it felt quite improvised at times.
England still have room to improve. They should use the time before the world cup just to become more experianced and handle stressful situations better.
fry November 15, 2010 1:53 am

Have you seen how England have been playing in the past year or two? Yeah, I'd say that beating the #2-ranked team is reason to celebrate and look forward to the coming year...
I really don't care for England much, but let them have their fun. I don't think anyone had been trash-talking OZ or anything, and no one has been claiming they'll win the RWC, so what's the big deal?
---
"Honestly find some humilty..."
"...I think the Springboks will give them a huge wake up call in two weeks time"
Yeah, because you sure set the standard for humility and all.
Anonymous November 15, 2010 2:16 am

Shark Attack November 15, 2010 2:25 am

Can wait for the bokke game I'll be in twickers.
Hard luck to the Aussies just the wrong day when NH rugby woke up and England put in the greatest show I've ever witnessed from them. Good game!!!
27th November!!!
Groot stryd bokke!!!
Come on bokke!!!
Anonymous November 15, 2010 2:25 am

Roadpig November 15, 2010 2:34 am

I was a little mystified by the refereeing re ruck and maul (I think the refereeing across the weekend was poor), but thought the scrum battles were regulated well. I agree with a couple of other comments: Pocock, despite being a part of a poor scrum, is consistently immense (the next McCaw), and Quade Cooper, is very much the new Carlos Spencer, enigmatic and at times freakishly brilliant in attack, but is also terribly inconsistent, and at times can cost his team. In addition, his defence sucks.
jrsONE November 15, 2010 2:39 am

England did a great job of neutralising Pocock which I think had a bigger influence on the result than has been ackownledged.
Anonymous November 15, 2010 3:10 am

le tired November 15, 2010 3:49 am

Notice even Pocock himself wasn't bitching. Just you.
Adrian November 15, 2010 4:00 am

Red roses take note - your boys did not win this in the scrum, they won it in the loose. Creaming ones pants over over Sheridan and scrum strength is all well and good, but if it means the forwards are too big and slow to get to the next ruck, then that big scrum is just a liability.
IMO Ashton needs to watch his celebrations though. He may suffer the wrath of the RugbyDump hordes for daring to show some excitement and attitude. Or does that only apply when NZ'ers showboat?
Anonymous November 15, 2010 4:28 am

Anonymous November 15, 2010 5:48 am

Jeremy November 15, 2010 6:14 am

I didn't watch the game, but what gives? What's with all the penalties? And is Craig Joubert just a bane for the Aussies or what?
JDG November 15, 2010 6:25 am

Did you miss the match a couple of weeks ago between the All Blacks and Australia or something? Australia carried on exactly the same way (especially the Australian commentators). Not that there was anything wrong with it mind you, just trying to put some perspective on your comments.
England are shaping up as a really good team, really enjoyed this game. Australia are very lucky to be as high as 2nd place on the IRB ladder (or does this loss drop them to 3rd now?). Will be interesting to see how SA goes against the English.
Nathan November 15, 2010 6:50 am

6N is nice, but we (french people) would like to be competitive during world cups...
Ned2or3 November 15, 2010 7:03 am

on the scrum- all penalties warranted as both sides were trying it on.
Oh well at least we finally beat the all blacks!!!
Hendrick November 15, 2010 7:31 am

P.S. Quade Cooper a twit.
USA! supporter World Cup 2011.
Ted November 15, 2010 7:53 am

Good performance by England but as everyone has been saying, one victory doesn't mean anything. I'll wait until after the SA test and 6N before I start celebrating a 'new' England.
zacaria November 15, 2010 8:20 am

the look on that ugly wingers face just sticks in my mind
quades shocking defence just cant be hidden at this level, lucky he make somthig from nothing
Anonymous November 15, 2010 9:17 am

Istilldislikescrumpe November 15, 2010 9:18 am

That came from Kurt Baker getting crucified on here for celebrating the match winning try at the commonwealth games final vs. England in the same way Ashton did. Naturally, it was mostly by disappointed England fans.
Anyway, well done England. Have to agree I thought Genia was hard done by in the lead up to Ashtons 2nd try, but well done Laws to help set it up. Makes a difference if your second rowers, etc. can play a little.
Makes a difference also if you play with the ball and not kick it away, i.e. it's not only time where you are attack but it denies the opposition the ball. Something England seemed (I've only seen the highlights)to do here and did in the 2nd 40 vs the All Blacks.
Anonymous November 15, 2010 9:48 am

Anonymous November 15, 2010 10:03 am

Unfortunately Australia looked bereft of ideas - I couldn't understand why the first two Aus penalties of the first half (near the sideline, and half-way, mind!) were shots at goal and not kicked to an attacking lineout!?! That lack of aggression gave England hope, I think.
Yes the refereeing was atrocious - not only inconsistent, but missing blatant infringements and dropped balls. However, this wasn't the reason we lost - we simply played terribly almost to a man (exceptions being Beale and Moore).
Anonymous November 15, 2010 10:13 am

TheMightyAB's November 15, 2010 10:52 am

Big Martin Johnson really got these time clicking Courtney Laws looks good ball in hand, Aston becoming a house hold name.
Who every would have thought the POMMYS would keep ball in hand the Roo farkers defense must have gone walkabout. If Harry potter can pull a rabbit out his arse then Kurtley can pull a rocket out his arse, Man the boys got speed every since he gave up the Goon bag he's been on fire and looking better every game.
This result is not just good for English rugby but good for world rugby its just another kick in the teeth to negative journalism in this country.
Now that Stevie PDIVY jones and his capped Crusaders Have nothing to Whinge about in there Sunday times column they can focus all there energy on putting a end to the AB'S and the haka
YEAR RIGHT !!
Another thing as AB'S supporter was disappointed with the All Black management appealing against Kevvy's 4week band he deserved it. In my opinion it wasn't reckless but a intent to hurt.
Barry Humphries November 15, 2010 11:07 am

One thing I hope to see sometime is Sonny Bill Williams taking on Quade Cooper's defensive channel / funnel. Should be a try or two in that one...
Anonymous November 15, 2010 11:16 am

By a lot
TheMightyAB's November 15, 2010 11:46 am

SA struggled defensively, wales punched to many holes in the midfield. SA miss forie? at center they needed that straight hard running. England cant afford to let SAFFA get there set piece cos there no better team at the rolling maul then SA. POMMYS have the players if they can get that go forward ball they have speed around the ruck with young and pace out wide., but its going to come down to what tight 5 dominates it always is with SA Bakkie & Matfield are like calk and cheese but complement each other in there style of play. In the lose forwards is going to be a real contest tom croft and co might lack the power of Speise, Juan but they got break down speed and need to get up and close them down quick dont fall into wales trap by giving space our they going to break tackles.
Be interesting to here your thoughts?
TheMightyAB's November 15, 2010 11:46 am

SA struggled defensively, wales punched to many holes in the midfield. SA miss forie? at center they needed that straight hard running. England cant afford to let SAFFA get there set piece cos there no better team at the rolling maul then SA. POMMYS have the players if they can get that go forward ball they have speed around the ruck with young and pace out wide., but its going to come down to what tight 5 dominates it always is with SA Bakkie & Matfield are like calk and cheese but complement each other in there style of play. In the lose forwards is going to be a real contest tom croft and co might lack the power of Speise, Juan but they got break down speed and need to get up and close them down quick dont fall into wales trap by giving space our they going to break tackles.
Be interesting to here your thoughts?
mat November 15, 2010 12:18 pm

also the ref was quick to yellow card australia but england killed the ball like that a couple of times and the ref didn't even warn them.
vinniechan November 15, 2010 12:33 pm

vinniechan November 15, 2010 12:37 pm

The Auss havnt had a regular dependable kicker otherwise their job in Hong Kong would have been a lot easier.
Those who think England peaked too early clearly think they can't do better than this.
I'd say they've found their game plan: screw the notion of expansive vs conservative rugby, just play what's in front of you.
I'd like to see more options and combinations in the mid field. Perhaps Samoa is a good game to try things out. They are worthy opponents who didn't seem to need a coach.
TheMightyAB's November 15, 2010 12:43 pm

Nathan November 15, 2010 1:06 pm

Australia's yellow card was because giteu (spelling) dived in from the side and lay on the ball when england were about to score a try. it was a professional foul. I don't remember england doing this once?
Nathan November 15, 2010 1:07 pm

errr, it was awesome. Of course there are still improvements to be made though.
Anonymous November 15, 2010 1:12 pm

vinniechan November 15, 2010 2:42 pm

The key point was Genia got turned and couldn't get the ballback on the right side and he had no support, which was a quite big difference.
vinniechan November 15, 2010 2:44 pm

R120 November 15, 2010 3:36 pm

The aussies were taken to the cleaners fair and square, through Englands good play, rather than their bad play.
Long way to go for England, but the road to the RWC looks like a bright one.
Bad weekend for the Aussies, i bet that loss to the Kiwis in League hurt too!
R120 November 15, 2010 3:37 pm

The aussies were taken to the cleaners fair and square, through Englands good play, rather than their bad play.
Long way to go for England, but the road to the RWC looks like a bright one.
Bad weekend for the Aussies, i bet that loss to the Kiwis in League hurt too!
GTI November 15, 2010 4:09 pm

If i was Toulons President i would hardly try to get Beale maybe after the world cup!
this guys gonna be a superstar!
TheMightyAB's November 15, 2010 5:51 pm

Gives a high five there brother !! haha The golden glory the lime light was short lived the criminals have to go back to wot they gud at....... Roo fucking go get im Skippy.
kevin November 15, 2010 6:24 pm

gud try tho
Von November 15, 2010 6:26 pm

Great performance from England, what i loved about it is that despite the attempts from various Aussies on here to find an excuse, England beat them without the Aussies being able to have any excuse for the defeat
How do you know the people making excuses on behalf of Australia are themselves Aussies?
I'm English and I think the turnover against Genia leading up to Ashton's second was won illegally. Palmer was lying all over the wrong side of the ruck and made no attempt at all to release him. Some good work by Tindall to dig it out though.
Anyway, I'm glad the ref let it go, otherwise rugby fans, whatever their nationality, would've missed a great try. TV producers are going to get vast mileage out of slow-mo-ing Ashton's facial expression where you see him face-on at about half-way. Nick Easter described it as "like a rhino mid-orgasm"...
Chris November 15, 2010 7:31 pm

------------
Won illegally lol, how? It's hardly Englands fault that Genia played the ball on Englands side.
If he held onto it he may have got a penalty.
TheMightyAB's November 15, 2010 7:34 pm

Lex November 15, 2010 8:12 pm

Danny P November 15, 2010 8:22 pm

peace out
TheMightyAB's November 15, 2010 8:28 pm

Von November 15, 2010 8:34 pm

I'm English and I think the turnover against Genia leading up to Ashton's second was won illegally.
------------
Chris said...
Won illegally lol, how? It's hardly Englands fault that Genia played the ball on Englands side.
If he held onto it he may have got a penalty.
Hi Chris, I'm not sure any of your comment makes sense.
To answer your question, how: see my complete post that you responded to.
1. Palmer makes a tackle but does not release the player - that's not allowed and under the new breakdown laws you're given even less time to release.
2. As the ruck is formed, Palmer gets himself on the wrong side of it, preventing Australian players from getting to the ball. That's not allowed either.
3. Not mentioned in my earlier post, but having watched the highlights above again, I'll add that Toby Flood, after helping to make the tackle, then enters the ruck from the side. That's not allowed either.
In fact, the only England player contesting that ruck legitimately is Mike Tindall, who in my opinion made a great steal.
Then you say it's "hardly Englands fault that Genia played the ball on Englands side", which doesn't make sense. Genia was the ball-carrier. Until he was tackled he's not on England's side of anything. Once the ruck formed he'd have had to release the ball, which indeed he did, resulting in the turnover.
However, that same point leads you to suggest that "if he held onto it he may have got a penalty"... Presumably you mean he (Genia) may have given away a penalty?
As I said, as an England fan, I'm pleased England got away with it. As an objective rugby fan, I have to say they did indeed get away with an illegal turnover.
Von November 15, 2010 8:39 pm

Anonymous November 15, 2010 8:58 pm

Both teams are still young and i am hoping for real fireworks from both come the RWC. At the end of the day the better team won in a high quality encounter.
Beale and Ashton would both be in my dream team back 3 at the moment, well played both, Ashtons Second SUBLIME!
Swing Low...Sweet Chariot!!
Anonymous November 15, 2010 9:13 pm

I know you want to bathe in the glory of England's victory some more, but it would be much appreciated if you posted the ABs vs Scotland highlights.
1
martin-offload November 15, 2010 9:28 pm

Simon November 15, 2010 9:31 pm

Ryan November 15, 2010 9:33 pm

coco November 15, 2010 10:03 pm

Wasn't much in the way of highlights, were there? Aside from Scotland making a few easy breaks through the AB defensive line, it was pretty much as you'd expect for a 49-3 slaughtering. That and the awful-looking injury to Max Evans just before the end of the match.
In any case, there's a requests section on this site you might try visiting.
Anonymous November 15, 2010 10:06 pm

Err.. I think that dream ended when the Irish side Connacht beat Samoa and the English side Leicester Tigers beat South Africa
Anonymous November 15, 2010 10:14 pm

Giteau got sent off for not rolling away while england were hot on attack. england score 13 points while hes off.
later on 2 english players commit the exact same offence if not worse and get absolutely nothing.
Jono November 15, 2010 10:35 pm

good grief November 15, 2010 11:53 pm

Ever heard of "playing the referee"?
Jono November 16, 2010 1:30 am

England played the ball on the ground a few times, didn't release and weren't punished.
If Australia did the same thing they were being penalised.
I thought Robinson in particular was harshly penalised. At one point he made a tackle, threw his arms to both sides to show he'd released then grabbed the ball from the tackled player.
It's a gray area.
If a guy makes a tackle but doesn't gop to ground doing it, then lets go of the guy while still standing over him, then grabs the ball, has he released? Because that's what Robinson did twice and he got penalsied both times. If pocock did that he'd get away with it.
Not taking anything away from Egnland, they deserved the win Australia's defence simpyl wasn't good enough.
Flipje November 16, 2010 11:12 am

They confirm the first good impression given vs the AB. Sound like MJ is finally finding the right balance between the forward/back lines. The game play was attractive (actually the most enjoyable to watch of all NH teams) and consistent.
As usual England is slowly improving before an important event.
Please stop moaning about refereeing decision (sound like my countryman discussing ban length discrepancy between nations). Anyhow, as mentioned above by Jono, home ground has/will mostly influenced refereeing decision.
As for the Australians, they are finalizing a long season, so the defeat should be brought into perspective.
Ps: Is there a credible replacement option for Tindall? Hope not :-)
Anonymous November 16, 2010 1:37 pm

doctober November 16, 2010 6:51 pm

The tackler, Palmer, tackled the player and turned him in the tackle. The Aussie scrum half didn't release the ball (and so if anything should have been an England penalty). Flood aids in the tackle and when he hits the floor stands up and immediately starts rucking. This is allowed, watch McCaw or Pocock do it over and over in a game when they are the first to the breakdown. By this time, in a normal situation, the ball carrier would need to release the ball. However, in this situation, the ball carrier wouldn't maybe due to the fact he was injured, maybe due to the fact he would have looked like a complete tit. (It is not Palmer holding it in, look at the arms not releasing the ball (and without being racist), the skin colors do not match). Therefore neither the tackler or the ball carrier could release the player or the ball.
Then Tindall comes in and cleans out. Again, legally. And what happened from then on was pure class :).
The difference between this event and the play leading to Giteau's sin binning is that in the first half, England had run the whole pitch and then were tackled. They were going forward and were vastly outnumbering the Aussies. For Giteua to end up on the wrong side of the ruck should have been a red card and then a penalty try. (Although, I am pleased it wasn't, because then the Poms would have been making up excuses for Englands absolutely destroying them).
Anyway, the win was really amazing. However, if any of you watched the full match, you would agree with me in saying that England could have scored about 4-5 more tries, very easily. So although the try count matched, Australia got off lightly.
Flood in my opinion played amazing, he was shipping balls all over the place and smashing into tackles and kicking like a king.
There is so much more to come :)
For the world cup, the SH should be quaking in their boots. England have been training together for maybe the last month in prep for these Autumn internationals and have produced (finally) some amazing rugby due to confidence in their own ability and team work.
The SH are together for almost 3 months, due to the tri nations and then various matches before coming to the NH.
Next year, Eng and the NH will have been together for 3 months building up to the WC and they will all be playing matches regularly and will be on a level of the SH in terms of match prep. The World Cup is going to be amazing!!!
doctober November 16, 2010 6:52 pm

The tackler, Palmer, tackled the player and turned him in the tackle. The Aussie scrum half didn't release the ball (and so if anything should have been an England penalty). Flood aids in the tackle and when he hits the floor stands up and immediately starts rucking. This is allowed, watch McCaw or Pocock do it over and over in a game when they are the first to the breakdown. By this time, in a normal situation, the ball carrier would need to release the ball. However, in this situation, the ball carrier wouldn't maybe due to the fact he was injured, maybe due to the fact he would have looked like a complete tit. (It is not Palmer holding it in, look at the arms not releasing the ball (and without being racist), the skin colors do not match). Therefore neither the tackler or the ball carrier could release the player or the ball.
Then Tindall comes in and cleans out. Again, legally. And what happened from then on was pure class :).
The difference between this event and the play leading to Giteau's sin binning is that in the first half, England had run the whole pitch and then were tackled. They were going forward and were vastly outnumbering the Aussies. For Giteua to end up on the wrong side of the ruck should have been a red card and then a penalty try. (Although, I am pleased it wasn't, because then the Poms would have been making up excuses for Englands absolutely destroying them).
Anyway, the win was really amazing. However, if any of you watched the full match, you would agree with me in saying that England could have scored about 4-5 more tries, very easily. So although the try count matched, Australia got off lightly.
Flood in my opinion played amazing, he was shipping balls all over the place and smashing into tackles and kicking like a king.
There is so much more to come :)
For the world cup, the SH should be quaking in their boots. England have been training together for maybe the last month in prep for these Autumn internationals and have produced (finally) some amazing rugby due to confidence in their own ability and team work.
The SH are together for almost 3 months, due to the tri nations and then various matches before coming to the NH.
Next year, Eng and the NH will have been together for 3 months building up to the WC and they will all be playing matches regularly and will be on a level of the SH in terms of match prep. The Wor
doctober November 16, 2010 6:53 pm

The tackler, Palmer, tackled the player and turned him in the tackle. The Aussie scrum half didn't release the ball (and so if anything should have been an England penalty). Flood aids in the tackle and when he hits the floor stands up and immediately starts rucking. This is allowed, watch McCaw or Pocock do it over and over in a game when they are the first to the breakdown. By this time, in a normal situation, the ball carrier would need to release the ball. However, in this situation, the ball carrier wouldn't maybe due to the fact he was injured, maybe due to the fact he would have looked like a complete tit. (It is not Palmer holding it in, look at the arms not releasing the ball (and without being racist), the skin colors do not match). Therefore neither the tackler or the ball carrier could release the player or the ball.
Then Tindall comes in and cleans out. Again, legally. And what happened from then on was pure class :).
The difference between this event and the play leading to Giteau's sin binning is that in the first half, England had run the whole pitch and then were tackled. They were going forward and were vastly outnumbering the Aussies. For Giteua to end up on the wrong side of the ruck should have been a red card and then a penalty try. (Although, I am pleased it wasn't, because then the Poms would have been making up excuses for Englands absolutely destroying them).
doctober November 16, 2010 6:53 pm

Flood in my opinion played amazing, he was shipping balls all over the place and smashing into tackles and kicking like a king.
There is so much more to come :)
For the world cup, the SH should be quaking in their boots. England have been training together for maybe the last month in prep for these Autumn internationals and have produced (finally) some amazing rugby due to confidence in their own ability and team work.
The SH are together for almost 3 months, due to the tri nations and then various matches before coming to the NH.
Next year, Eng and the NH will have been together for 3 months building up to the WC and they will all be playing matches regularly and will be on a level of the SH in terms of match prep. The Wor
Jono November 16, 2010 10:30 pm

The first thing though, is that you are wrong about Palmer.
He has to release the tackeld player once he makes the tackle.
Release and roll away.
He never did that, if you can't see that your blind.
He clearly makes the tackle, then holds on to Genia the whole time, never lets go, turns hima fter the tackle and attempts to play the ball.
Completely illegal.
But again, home town advantage, the ref let it go.
doctober November 16, 2010 11:03 pm

I agree with you after the ball is released. However, when the Aussies were rucking over, there is no way he can get up. Depending on the discretion of the referee he makes the call.
Throughout the game, he let a lot of similar calls go, for both teams to do with not releasing the tackler. If he was to do that, his reffing would have been inconsistent; which I believe wasn't throughout the game.
(Nice to hear from someone on these forums who knows the rules though :) )
tony November 16, 2010 11:35 pm

SH CLEAN SWEEP OH YEAH BABY!!!!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Jono November 17, 2010 2:32 am

I would read exactly sweet fuck all into that game.
Doctober, that's an interesting interpretation.
I don;t agree, the act of releasing the ball after being tackled and the tackler rolling away are two seperate things, two seperate offences.
If we appleid your logic, all any tackler would have to do is wrap up the ball and then he could just stay holding on in the tackle forever. The tackled player can't release if the tackler is holding the ball, and the tackler doesn't have the right to play the ball.
Watch Palmer, he gets to his feet and immediatly plays the ball, he's standing there on his feet, with his back to the Aussies.
That means he's playing the ball from an aillegal position, ebcause if he;'s the tackler and he's released, he then has to go around and enter the ruck legally. He never did that and he was clearly playing the ball.
Genia must release at some point, or how did England get the ball.
Palmer shouldn;t have been doing what he was doing though, which won the turnover.
But this is a small thing, the ref may have favoured England a bit at the breakdown, I persoanlly think he did.
However, Australia didn't deserve to win anyway, they weren't strong enough defensivley, missed far too many tackles (thanks Cooper).
Anonymous November 17, 2010 2:33 am

you don't seem to understand/know the rules
Tom November 17, 2010 5:02 am

The act of the tackled player placing the ball is a completely seperate issue to the tackler rolling away.
Also, a player having made a tackle must not only release the tackled player, he must then enter the ruck legally.
In Palmer's case that would have meant running around behind the English defensive line and entering the ruck from the correct channel.
In other words he broke two laws.
He never released the tackled player and he never entered the ruck legally.
Tom November 17, 2010 5:19 am

At least he wasn't on the completely wrong side of the ruck though, like Palmer.
Stuart November 17, 2010 8:00 am

"Anyway, the win was really amazing. However, if any of you watched the full match, you would agree with me in saying that England could have scored about 4-5 more tries, very easily. So although the try count matched, Australia got off lightly."
The rational way to look at this is, despite playing better than they have for yonks England completely botched a couple of other chances and didn't deserve any more points than they ended up with. If they could've scored them "very easily" then why didn't they?
I also agree with all the comments about England being very lucky with the Genia tackle and an Australian penalty there might've made things very different. So be happy with the points you got.
btw I'm not Australian.
Ted November 17, 2010 9:41 am

Anonymous November 17, 2010 11:16 am

the rule now is that even players on their feet must also release the player completely before going back in for the ball.
Genia had 3 guys committing penalizable offences and it wasnt picked up. like the hartly try the week before, there were half a dozen things which could have been called in the direct lead up to that try yet none were.
something seriously needs to be done about the reffing.
Anonymous November 17, 2010 12:15 pm

Von November 17, 2010 1:19 pm

Genia did eventually release the ball, which is how it ended up in English hands.
Anyway, you're jumping the gun a bit on England's world cup chances aren't you! We've won two matches against the same team, (who we actually seem to have a bit of a hex over now, which is nice :). But that's it so far.
If England resoundingly beat Samoa and South Africa, as well as at least three of the other six nations teams, THEN we can start dreaming about being world-beaters again......
Jimbo November 17, 2010 9:18 pm

Rule 15.4 (c)
http://www.irblaws.com/EN/laws/4/15/140/during-the-match/tackle-ball-carrier-brought-to-ground/the-tackler/#clause_140
Doctober check out the same website as you're wrong. Palmer should have released immediately. Penalty Australia! BTW English and still an awesome try :)
Bill November 17, 2010 10:26 pm

If he's left the ruck, moved away, he can't come back into it from any direction.
It makes the rule about the tackler playing it from any direction almost moot.
Canadian Content November 18, 2010 12:40 am

Traditionally I don't cheer for the limies but you have to love the rugby they are playing and the players playing it. Youngs, Foden, Lawes and Ashton have to be some of the most exciting young players in the world.
Cueto had a cracker as well. Owned Cooper.
Jimbo November 18, 2010 4:55 pm

Bill November 18, 2010 10:09 pm

He was on the wrong side of the ruck and clearly impeding the opposition, he's the main reason they couldn't get to Genia.
He then got to his feet, without rleasing, then lost his feet again, still without releasing.
Everything he did in that ruck was illegal.
Flood too never released. It was illegal. It's obvious.
granite November 19, 2010 5:18 am

My thoughts: terrible reffing, Eng overall gaining some advantage from it (though australia got the rub in the first 10 min but didn't capatilise).
I don't doubt the skills of the English team, but Joubert made some signficant calls or no-calls in the game.
Could have been a different result with different ref on the day, which is not a good thing.
Ted November 19, 2010 11:31 am

England played all the rugby and were comfortably 10 points better than Australia on the day. If there was a different ref then he might have made different decisions but England would still have won. The ref did not cost Australia 18 points, no ref can do that. If it was a case of England sneaking home by one or two points then you might be right.
Jimbo November 19, 2010 6:31 pm















Commenting as Guest | Register or Login