Friday, December 24, 2010
Clinical Leinster turn on the heat against Clermont
It was a bitterly cold night in Dublin as a record crowd turned out to soak up the festive atmosphere and watch their side produce a superb performance to knock over Clermont with a 24-8 victory, laying down a serious marker for the rest of the Heineken Cup.
Two tries by Cian Healey and one by Sean OBrien meant that Leinster took a grip on pool two and contributed towards ruining Clermonts chances of an easy route to the next round. They missed out a bonus point, but importantly denied the visitors of one too.
"The win is particularly satisfying because we stopped them getting a bonus point, so in the head to head we are 5-4 in front," said coach Joe Schmidt.
"This week we were up for it more. We really had the bit between our teeth and were charging at them. It was a bit of trench warfare and great footy from both sides. We did go a little flat in the last 20 minutes but I think the intensity we brought, particularly in the first 20 minutes of the first and second halves, might have drained us a little and we just lost our shape."
Devon Toner was impressive on the night, which bodes well for his World Cup chances with Ireland for 2011. "Im just trying to do what I can for Leinster, Im not looking any further," he said.
Leinster play Ulster in the Magners League on the 27th of this month, shortly after the festive celebrations take place over the next few days.
"Weve got Christmas Day off, but weve got a match on 27th December against Ulster, we have to prepare for that so we wont be eating too much," Toner added.
As mentioned earlier, RD will be back in full swing shortly after New Years as once a year, things slow down a little around this time. All the best for the holiday season and if youre celebrating, we'd like to wish you a very merry Christmas.
Time: 04:51
Posted at 11:06 am | 60 comments
|
|
Viewing 60 comments
Anonymous December 24, 2010 11:07 am

Also, a touch ref brought to Owens' attention that Ledesma punched a Leinster player in the face. Owens just gave him a warning, despite the touch judge saying exactly what had just happened. I find it strange how O' Connell can hit someone with his back turned and get a red and 4 weeks, while a Ledesma can punch a player in the face while looking at him, and not even get a penalty, even though he was seen doing it by an official.
Not to mention the fact that he didn't go to the TMO for Hines' try (despite it being an obvious try) and he did go to the TMO when the exact same situation occurred a minute or two later. Luckily Leinster scored for a second time during that period to even fix Owens' mistake.
Owens is a terrible referee and the inconsistency in all areas of rugby is getting absolutely ridiculous.
Leeners93 December 24, 2010 11:08 am

Leeners93 December 24, 2010 11:18 am

mike ross also had a rock solid game,he has to be given a go in the 6 nations.imo he is a much better option for tight head than buckley.
Leeners93 December 24, 2010 11:18 am

mike ross also had a rock solid game,he has to be given a go in the 6 nations.imo he is a much better option for tight head than buckley.
Anonymous December 24, 2010 11:19 am

Anonymous December 24, 2010 11:20 am

Jack78 December 24, 2010 11:24 am

Completely agree with anon, higgelty piggelty decisions all over rugby this year. A bit of consistancy would be nice
KG December 24, 2010 12:19 pm

O' Brien and Healy got lots of praise, but I was pretty impressed with Heaslip. Solid tackling the whole game, put is some big hits, lasted 80 when he wasn't even sure if he could play. Very reliable. I don't even like Heaslip.
themull December 24, 2010 12:42 pm

John F December 24, 2010 12:58 pm

Clermont really are the Chump XV but that probably won't be good enough to win the cup, even with all the they can throw at getting a 30 man squad of internationals.
BigBucks December 24, 2010 1:36 pm

Leinster looking good - Dare i say its a two horse race between them and toulouse?
dutchrugbyplayer December 24, 2010 2:18 pm

just wondering how the hell that last pass was forward. Not that it really matters in the result though.
Box December 24, 2010 3:05 pm

BigBucks December 24, 2010 3:10 pm

Look at the markings on the pitch from where the pass starts and where it ends.
It looks way back due to the speed their all running at - sort of illusion.
dutchrugbyplayer December 24, 2010 3:41 pm

Mathematically you are right. Nevertheless, if you measure every pass that way, at least half of the passes should be judged forward. Those passes are normally just judged forward in case the player that throws the pass is suddenly stopped by a hard tackle. Normally play goes on when the pass looks to have gone backwark compared to the speed of the player throwing the pass (sorry, I find it hard to explain in English)
Colombes December 24, 2010 3:47 pm

Clermont haven't lose their qualification. Win in Ireland is always tough. they won't qialify because of their match against racing where they put a team-B.
Toulouse, Leinster and Wasps seem to be superiors.
Nigel Owens is a cyclotimic ref. sometimes very severe and sometimes very laxist. It must be hard to interpretate his decisions
jay December 24, 2010 4:00 pm

Nevertheless good game from Leinster... nothing to say about their victory
Anonymous December 24, 2010 4:09 pm

Having said that, Ross holding the scrum, Healy, O'Brien and Heaslip carrying at pace, D'Arcy having his best season for a few years, Nacewa exuding confidence at the back and Fitzgerald still to come back, the outlook is good. If Kearney is learning how to pass out of the tackle, I'll be happy to see him back as well.
Anonymous December 24, 2010 4:23 pm

That happens in almost every ruck... BOD haters... gotta love 'em.
More like 4 seconds by the way.
Anonymous December 24, 2010 5:19 pm

if a player is running at, say 15 km/h with ball in hand, then the ball is also travelling forward at 15 km/h. If the player passes the ball backwards, the ball is still travelling forward at 15 km/h at the moment at which the pass is made even though the ball is passed 'backwards'. So looking at the ground markings tells you nothing about the legitiimacy of the pass because the ball travels forward through the air for all passes made by a player who is himself moving forward. This is particularly evident from Horgan's pass because of the speed at which he was moving and the length of the pass.
BigBucks December 24, 2010 6:13 pm

The ref can only play what he see's, and he saw it go back.
Happyskaman December 24, 2010 8:47 pm

Anonymous December 25, 2010 12:09 am

Anonymous December 25, 2010 12:35 am

Also, Leinster had that retard Owens making wrong or stupid calls against them throughout the match (as he has been doing since 2008 against Leinster).
fry December 25, 2010 6:02 am

secondfive December 25, 2010 9:36 am

Anonymous December 25, 2010 4:08 pm

Anonymous December 25, 2010 6:05 pm

i think someone is using his nickname to say bullshits
sad to see some "youtube" trolls on RD
Anonymous December 25, 2010 6:16 pm

Moreover, what's the point of shouting "Tackler, release... Release... Release!" I mean, this rule was made to quicken the game but if you have time to yell that, the ball has already been slowed down. A penalty should be given way before the 3rd "Release"!
el December 25, 2010 6:18 pm

Weird and sad.
Jimbo December 25, 2010 9:30 pm

fry December 26, 2010 3:23 am

"A throw forward occurs when a player throws or passes the ball forward. 'Forward' means towards the opposing team's dead ball line."
The first part ("...throws...the ball forward") would imply the more accepted idea that even if the ball travels forward of where it was thrown (due to the forward motion of the passer), as long as the pass was directed towards the attacking team's dead ball line (re: 'backward'), then it's okay.
The second part ("...passes the ball forward") could be more open towards the idea of having to judge where the ball was passed from and then where it ended up.
The first one seems easier to referee (ie - "Did the player attempt to pass backward?" If so, it's fine, regardless of where momentum carries it). The second way of looking at it also means that a player running forward will always have to throw a ball backwards "harder" than he would have to if using the first way of looking at it (to counter-act the motion of the player that tends to carry the ball forward).
But I think at the end of the day, the IRB hasn't put the matter to bed and it's at the discretion of the referee to decide on what is a "forward pass".
D0m3 December 26, 2010 12:25 pm

So the pass in the highlight is clearly not forward.
IMO it is incredible that, at this level, there isn't a clear rule about forward pass.
Anonymous December 26, 2010 3:23 pm

Anonymous December 26, 2010 4:08 pm

Box December 26, 2010 5:20 pm

View Video
Flooz December 26, 2010 7:35 pm

secondfive December 27, 2010 1:09 am

@Jimbo... I understand what you're saying but if the law was always refereed as you suggest then no flat or slightly backwards pass between players running in parallel would ever be allowed because common sense tells us that the ball must also move in the direction the players are running. So the game as we know it would be impossible and the number of stoppages would escalate.
@Box.. I know some people don't agree with the referees' video that you've linked here but it does two things the IRB laws don't do.
(a) it takes into account what actually happens to a ball thrown flat or even slightly backward between players running at speed.
(b) it presents a way of dealing with it that makes sense and works for the game.
And I believe most international referees judge "forward" passes in the way this video suggests which is why Owens' decision looks, let's say, unusual.
Anonymous December 27, 2010 1:29 am

Jeff December 27, 2010 7:46 am

Anonymous December 27, 2010 10:03 am

Blue 15 looks like a good player.
Thanks
Anonymous December 27, 2010 1:01 pm

you know exactly who he is.stop trying to stir up an argument
Jimbo December 27, 2010 8:30 pm

Played a game on boxing day (invited as first teamers didn't want to injure themselves :) and had a go during the warm up. Provided and interesting insight...go and try it :)
buck December 28, 2010 12:49 am

It's certainly not that black and white, but I do think it has something to do with the rugby culture of one place vs. another (since the IRB law isn't specific enough in this instance).
Box December 28, 2010 5:34 am

Mike December 28, 2010 1:00 pm

JAY December 28, 2010 2:13 pm

Can't say I've noticed much difference between the NH and SH refs when it comes to forward passes. I watch a bit of Magners League and have followed the Heineken Cup for quite a while and I watch the November Internationals.
(New Zealander here by the way)
Anonymous December 29, 2010 12:40 am

mise December 29, 2010 1:46 am

There's always youtube, y'know?
Sheesh.......
el December 30, 2010 4:30 am

Thanks for yet another year of awesome rugby coverage!!















Commenting as Guest | Register or Login