Wednesday, February 23, 2011
The big hits from the Blues vs Crusaders classic
It was built up to be the match up of the weekend, and fans weren't let down as those at the stadium, a healthy 32 000 plus, and those at home watched a thrilling contest between the two New Zealand heavyweights.
Goal kicking wasn't great, but aside from that the match had everything, with a few stand out players making powerful charges, tackle breaking runs, and of course big hits.
This short video features some of the rough stuff from the game, with guys like Rene Ranger of the Blues brushing off tackles but also taking a few big ones. Jerome Kaino was also sensational, tackling everything that moved and showing why he's rated so highly.
Some of the notable hits could easily be featured here as stand alone clips, namely Isaia Toeava's big tackle early in the game, Corey Flynn's on Ranger, and Anthony Boric's huge tackle on Israel Dagg. There's one of two bumps and charges that are worth seeing too, so it's all included.
Tries from this game will be featured in another compilation sometime this week if all goes well. For now, hopefully this gives you an idea of the level of physicality of this particular match-up.
Time: 02:43
Music: Dutchies by Shapeshifter
Posted at 5:28 pm | 70 comments
|
|
Viewing 70 comments
Anonymous February 23, 2011 4:56 pm

Booyaa!
Von February 23, 2011 5:06 pm

orange February 23, 2011 5:10 pm

I don't get to see much Super Rugby, so cheers RD!
Anonymous February 23, 2011 5:16 pm

Some cracking tackles nevertheless!!
Anonymous February 23, 2011 5:26 pm

Irishman February 23, 2011 5:27 pm

You want good rugby, watch Aironi vs Exeter now that is world class!
Anonymous February 23, 2011 5:30 pm

You really think any Aviva/ Magners team could touch the blues? not in a lifetime...
Greiffel February 23, 2011 5:35 pm

Anonymous February 23, 2011 5:35 pm

Booyaa, go change your nappy and stop whining
Tom February 23, 2011 5:53 pm

Anonymous February 23, 2011 5:55 pm

FP February 23, 2011 6:00 pm

Anonymous February 23, 2011 6:17 pm

Will they be the same when the world cup comes along?
orange February 23, 2011 6:29 pm

"The Prince of Tides is neither about a prince nor tides. Discuss."
Babby February 23, 2011 6:52 pm

Anonymous February 23, 2011 6:54 pm

King February 23, 2011 6:57 pm

There is no better or worse defence in either hemisphere, it's a pointless argument. There is however different styles, due probably to playing conditions.
KB February 23, 2011 7:37 pm

No doubt most of those comments were written by the same person who truly cares little for rugby!
Anonymous February 23, 2011 7:50 pm

Hmmm... Nah I think it's actually because of the money.
Denominator February 23, 2011 8:28 pm

Darren February 23, 2011 8:38 pm

Whoever said that tacklers bounce off due to bad technique, you just proved to me that you tackled like a pussy all your life. I discovered what happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object. Time travel. As in when you snap out of it, you're at the bar a few hours later having scoupes. Whoever compared Arioni V Exeter to The Blues V the Reds. You're a funny mofo Irishman.
Any Kiwis out there, hope you and yours stayed well away from any suffering due to the earthquake. I'm heading down your way for the world cup, I hope that tragedy doesn't mess anything up for you guys. Now your boyz have something to win for. God bless.
Anonymous February 23, 2011 9:00 pm

Yes Darren.....because the all blacks didn't have anything to win for before the earthquake struck....
Geez talk about having quite a good point then shooting yourself in the foot....
Do you really think the person posing as Irishman was actually Irish? Or actually said what he said with any sense of sincerity.... Clown...
Anonymous February 23, 2011 9:04 pm

Darren February 23, 2011 9:22 pm

Firstly, of course they wanted to win, but it's a massive incentive to do something great as a nation when said nation has experienced something traumatic. It lights a fire in the players soul. You think it won't make a difference, ya and I'm the clown.
"Do you really think the person posing as Irishman was actually Irish? Or actually said what he said with any sense of sincerity.... Clown..."
Do you really think I give a fuck where he's from, that's his name. And I called him a funny mofo. Ya Arioni are on a par with Super 15 rugby, sincerely. Gobshite.
Darren February 23, 2011 9:26 pm

ElTigre February 23, 2011 9:37 pm

Faceman February 23, 2011 9:59 pm

Show them attacking highlights they complain about the defense, show defensive highlights they complain about the attack wtf?
Surely these guys aren't serious and are just shit stirring for reactions.
Anonymous February 23, 2011 10:12 pm

19 February 2011
Blues 24 22 Crusaders
Eden Park, Auckland
Attendance: 32,700
32,700 a bit different to 52,000 ;)
Anonymous February 23, 2011 10:28 pm

Jono February 23, 2011 11:16 pm

I'm guessing he's a fat arse 30 year old who got bulleyed at school and has no girlfriend, so he comes on here and starts shit.
This was a great game.
Very, very high quality rugby.
There were 22 All Blacks in the starting teams.
That's as close to international rugby as it gets outside of test matches.
RugbyFan February 23, 2011 11:32 pm

Herp February 23, 2011 11:42 pm

I think everyones (including our NH friends) happy super rugby is back on showcasing some actual skill.
mise February 23, 2011 11:51 pm

Basically, its not worth it.
1 liner comments designed to wind things up in a NH SH way - forget them. Don't reply. Don't interact.
And in general, unless there's sth interesting and specific in NH-SH terms (e.g. how a specific player got on differently in both hemis in different seasons) it just ain't worth it.
Anonymous February 24, 2011 12:35 am

'Now your boyz have something to win for'
....like I said, Clown
Lay off. February 24, 2011 12:45 am

Just shut up anon, darren actually made a constructive post, and your giving him a hard time for it.
Anonymous February 24, 2011 12:47 am

It should pick up once it goes professional.
Anonymous February 24, 2011 1:16 am

Alexander February 24, 2011 1:38 am

Tui February 24, 2011 1:55 am

How well did you guys do in the Autumn internationals? win them all?
Yet you have the audacity to spout this 'SH' crap.
We (NZ) are the only team to go undefeated in the Autumn internationals, yet you lot start this whole 'we SH'ers are unbeatable etc'
Australia, you lost to a ropey mish mash england team.. and South Africa you lost to a team we beat by 46 points.....
In all fairness i think the equation here is:
NZ> Saffa's and OZ =/> NH
You guys are riding par with the NH in some big let down games, so how about sticking to your own team and not riding off our success!
Tui February 24, 2011 1:56 am

Jono February 24, 2011 2:03 am

It doesn't really work that way.
These are provincial teams, drawn from ITM Cup teams (NZ's domestic competition).
It's complicated but Canterbury basically develops these players from a young age with the help of ITM Cup teams and different regional youth teams and acadmeies. 80-90% anyway, some players move from other provinces and stuff and there's the odd league player like SBW or Thorn, but largely they are developed by the Crusaders.
Jono February 24, 2011 2:09 am

And in case you forgot, it was only a year or so ago that South Africa was beating the shit out of NZ, so try to rein it in a little eh?
Tui February 24, 2011 3:13 am

I'm aware generally Oz and SA rugby is better than NH, but how many times do I hear about the 'unbeatable boks being part of the mighty SH' ? I couldn't give 2 f*cks if the bold beat a NH side, I only care if NZ win their matches. I enjoy all rugby but as a NZ go proudly supports a pretty unbeatable team (for the time being) I am sick of hearing about the 'SH'.... It's every team for their own....
You think if Australia or SA beat a NH team I'm going to say 'haha silly little NH! come here my SH brothers, let's all have a big hug because we live in te same hemisphere...' ? NO because next week we will be playing SA or Oz then it's all eyes on that result. We can all fart and tickle each other in the pub afterwards, but I'm hardly going to be thrilled at another teams result if I lost matches (ala SA-scot and Oz-England)
Tui February 24, 2011 3:14 am

Jono February 24, 2011 3:26 am

I guess it's more in teh context of defending the Super 15 that we have alot of these debates, so it becomes a SH/NH thing.
Which is often a bit stupid anyway.
And I was refering to the 2009 tri-nations, by the way, it wasn't that long ago SA was top of the pile.
Been a while since Aus was though... sigh.
Rocky February 24, 2011 3:49 am

Rocky February 24, 2011 3:49 am

Rocky February 24, 2011 3:52 am

Jono February 24, 2011 3:52 am

He was quite reasonable.
Maybe you should take your own advice.
Rocky February 24, 2011 4:05 am

Douglas February 24, 2011 4:33 am

Re: Toeava, just an incredibly skilled player, but I think his best position is #15, which is tough, because NZ already have Muliana/Dagg/Jane at that position, which is why he's used on the wing by the ABs.
Anonymous February 24, 2011 6:01 am

Jono February 24, 2011 6:01 am

It'd be nice to just have a normal conversation.
Something about the internet everyone forgets their manners.
Colombes February 24, 2011 9:27 am

Maybe the Super 15 defences are a bit more "elastic" than in NH, but the attacking show is great to see.
i think france-england will reserve some huge shocks. can't wait saturday..
Anonymous February 24, 2011 11:38 am

New Zealand won 6, lost 27, draw 1
Australia won 16, lost 23, draw 1
South Africa won 12, lost 19, draw 1
Ireland vs top 3
New Zealand won 0, lost 23, draw 1
Australia won 8, lost 20, draw 1
South Africa won 4, lost 15, draw 1
Scotland vs top 3
New Zealand won 0, lost 26, draw 2
Australia won 8, lost 18, draw 0
South Africa won 5, lost 16, draw 0
Wales vs top 3
New Zealand won 3, lost 25, draw 0
Australia won 10, lost 19, draw 1
South Africa won 1, lost 23, draw 1
France vs top 3
New Zealand won 12, lost 36, draw 1
Australia won 16, lost 23, draw 1
South Africa won 11, lost 21, draw 6
These are just facts (and Im from the north)
Now stop bitching and watch the amazing Rugbydump has to offer.
You can check this at rugbydata.com
Filipe
tb February 24, 2011 11:59 am

Anonymous February 24, 2011 12:02 pm

No.7 February 24, 2011 12:03 pm

What would be more interesting is to see how things are related more recently....
Its hard because teams ebb and flow all the time...i.e england were pretty much right at the top of the cliff in 2003 wc...then they fell off the edge when they ran out of electrical tape to hold the ageing players together (i.e 2004/05/06 etc...) Only recently have they seemed to gel a bit better (however its early days)
Ireland seemed to be on the way up, but then never quite reached their potential and now appear to be on the way down (and up, and down and up)
Scotland are similar in a sense to france...I mean that in the sense that, It depends whether they actually turn up...We have seen scotland get ruined by NZ in the last Autumn series, then have a fantastic game against SA...and this has happened time and time again....(but more so, they have a great game against one hard team, then some how seem to be amateurs against a relatively easy team...)
France, (see above) seem to behave in a similar fashion, dont turn up sometimes...
Wales are just wales, relatively boring team on paper that suddenly produces a great game. or a relatively interesting team that produce a crap game....or somewhere inbetween...
The big 'issue' here, is that Rugby down south is running rugby....im not saying forward play doesnt happen, but predominantly we see running rugby...which is why, imo, SA are the most dangerous generally, because they have the forwards to play just forward rugby, and potentially outclass any 'forwards only team' and the backs which can potentially outclass any 'backs only team'
NZ follows closely behind IMO, i dont 'not' rate their forwards, however I don't hold them in such high regard as SA. however NZ backs I class as the best (as a team, not necessarily individually) right now....
Australia, I dont see playing often enough...But recently their forwards looked to have stepped up their game. After some poor performances recently.
I think NH rugby is picking up on the running rugby style, whilst generally focussing on predominantly forward play... I (having played in both hemispheres) put this down to pitch conditions. Ofcourse NH gets dry weather (sometimes) but generally long passes on a windy sh*tty game don't happen. Games where you cannot tell which team is which from the mud tend to be low scoring slow, painful, and inch by inch rugby...
I think this is why you see more 'flair' with the French, the better weather in France gives you more to play with. (ofcourse adaptation is the key here!)
Anonymous February 24, 2011 12:04 pm

RD February 24, 2011 12:06 pm

I simply don't have time to trawl through the rubbish and remove all the childish comments. That valuable time (not to mention the time spent creating this post) could be spent improving other aspects of the site, or generating extra content.
If you fancy saying anything positive, feel free to get in touch via email.
Cheers














Commenting as Guest | Register or Login