Sunday, March 13, 2011
Mike Phillips controversial try sets up Wales win over Ireland
It was a controversial moment that had the crowd searching for their rule books, as Welsh hooker Matthew Rees threw a quick lineout to Phillips from the touchline, allowing the scrum-half to power over for a converted score and the lead.
However, it was a different ball to the one which had been kicked out previously, and although referee Jonathan Kaplan requested confirmation about this - Allan said it was the same ball.
Unfortunately for Ireland the television replays conclusively illustrated that Allan was wrong. This mistake has further pushed the claim for televisions decisions to be referred to more often and in greater depth.
Yet Ireland cannot blame the officials for letting this game slip through their fingers, especially considering Paddy Wallace decided not to finish what seemed to be an easy run in with the dying phases of the game.
When Brian ODriscoll crossed for his 24th tournament try two minutes into the game, Wales looked to be in for a rough ride. Yet Ireland did not look like scoring after this, and repeated offences allowed for Welsh fly-half James Hook to kick his side back into the game.
The win gives Wales, who are now level on points with England, small hope of winning the Six Nations; and with Ireland basically out of contention, it will be the try that should never have been awarded that will leave the Emerald Isle seething.
Irish captain Brian O'Driscoll has slammed the match officials. "I didn't see it myself but when half your team are saying it, you take their word for it," he said. "I tried to relate that to Jonathan Kaplan and the touch judge and they were having none of it and it's really frustrating for such an incident to have a huge bearing on the game.
"Games hang in the balance on decisions, everyone is human and wrong calls are made sometimes, but some are unforgivable."
Meanwhile a satisfied Warren Gatland believed the decision wasnt a problem:
"I can understand Ireland being frustrated with the try that was allowed but it's a decision that's gone our way, we've had some against us in the past, so I'm not complaining about it."
Below is the try in question, as well as some discussion post match regarding the extended use of the Television Match Official. It's unfortunate that the laws don't allow it currently, as this incident shows that it's not possible for officials to always be completely on top of things.
Mike Phillips vs Fabio Semenzato - The battle of the number nines
Blues score a try from a quick lineout (2007)
Thanks to the BBC
Posted at 9:45 am | 215 comments
|
|
Viewing 215 comments
Anonymous March 13, 2011 9:12 am

Anonymous March 13, 2011 9:12 am

Anonymous March 13, 2011 9:17 am

Anonymous March 13, 2011 9:17 am

Laz March 13, 2011 9:18 am

Ireland still had 30 minutes to win the match though.
Hopefully this does something for new legislation put in place re. TMO powers
Laz March 13, 2011 9:18 am

Ireland still had 30 minutes to win the match though.
Hopefully this does something for new legislation put in place re. TMO powers
Anonymous March 13, 2011 9:20 am

Anonymous March 13, 2011 9:20 am

JoelTaylor March 13, 2011 9:21 am

One thing that Irish people may find hugely galling is when Gatland said after the match "We deserved a bit of luck".
I'm fairly sure that was one piece of luck no team deserves.
JoelTaylor March 13, 2011 9:21 am

One thing that Irish people may find hugely galling is when Gatland said after the match "We deserved a bit of luck".
I'm fairly sure that was one piece of luck no team deserves.
brookster-2 March 13, 2011 9:28 am

"never leave it in the hands of the judges"
I am not for greater involvement of the television match official, like a previous comment made
"Nothing the ref could've done differently. He asked the touch judge. He said it's the correct ball. Everyone has their role, the ref has to rely on the support from the whole officiating group." I completely agree.
I think the refs have to enforce there ruling as equally as possible, thats all, as long as they do it to both teams.
But it is gut wrenching when this happens, so the passion is not completely random. But I hate to say it, sometimes you should not allow yourself or the team to get in such a position.
The refs are not going to get it right every time, and as players they are pushing their will as far as they can interms of tolerance by the referee...
It may suck or be shocking, but this will happen occasionally with a quick desperate game, like rugby..
brookster-2 March 13, 2011 9:28 am

"never leave it in the hands of the judges"
I am not for greater involvement of the television match official, like a previous comment made
"Nothing the ref could've done differently. He asked the touch judge. He said it's the correct ball. Everyone has their role, the ref has to rely on the support from the whole officiating group." I completely agree.
I think the refs have to enforce there ruling as equally as possible, thats all, as long as they do it to both teams.
But it is gut wrenching when this happens, so the passion is not completely random. But I hate to say it, sometimes you should not allow yourself or the team to get in such a position.
The refs are not going to get it right every time, and as players they are pushing their will as far as they can interms of tolerance by the referee...
It may suck or be shocking, but this will happen occasionally with a quick desperate game, like rugby..
orange March 13, 2011 9:34 am

Having said that, I don't think the laws need to be changed. But there does need to be some accountability for this....
As or Ireland having time enough to win the game back, yeah, of course they did. But why not just award Wales 7 points at the start of the match and say, "Well, you boys have 80 minutes to beat them, so it's your fault if you don't."
PS - Ireland played horribly. Their forwards are liabilities and aren't good enough players to justify the amount of penalties they give away.
O'Brien made one really great break but infringed god knows how many times; O'Callaghan was the same story with his hands in the ruck and entering from anywhere but the gate; POC was seemingly absent from the match, which is fine because at least he wasn't giving away penalties (though I did notice he tried to come forward when the ref asked to speak with Healy and BOD - you're not captain, Paul!); Heaslip made little impact. The backs seem to be the only ones there to play, and yet Kidney unnecessarily takes ROG off and sticks in Sexton.
That said, it wasn't Ireland alone who were awful at the breakdown. Wales were often worse, and on top of that, Kaplan seemed to care less. I guess that it's Ireland's fault if they've earned the reputation of poor breakdown play and therefore the scrutiny of the referee, but Wales were lucky as hell not to give away more penalties that Ireland did.
orange March 13, 2011 9:34 am

Having said that, I don't think the laws need to be changed. But there does need to be some accountability for this....
As or Ireland having time enough to win the game back, yeah, of course they did. But why not just award Wales 7 points at the start of the match and say, "Well, you boys have 80 minutes to beat them, so it's your fault if you don't."
PS - Ireland played horribly. Their forwards are liabilities and aren't good enough players to justify the amount of penalties they give away.
O'Brien made one really great break but infringed god knows how many times; O'Callaghan was the same story with his hands in the ruck and entering from anywhere but the gate; POC was seemingly absent from the match, which is fine because at least he wasn't giving away penalties (though I did notice he tried to come forward when the ref asked to speak with Healy and BOD - you're not captain, Paul!); Heaslip made little impact. The backs seem to be the only ones there to play, and yet Kidney unnecessarily takes ROG off and sticks in Sexton.
That said, it wasn't Ireland alone who were awful at the breakdown. Wales were often worse, and on top of that, Kaplan seemed to care less. I guess that it's Ireland's fault if they've earned the reputation of poor breakdown play and therefore the scrutiny of the referee, but Wales were lucky as hell not to give away more penalties that Ireland did.
orange March 13, 2011 9:38 am

But in order to keep it as simple and as flowing of a game that it is, sometimes shit happens that breaks your heart. It just happened to be Ireland who "took one for the team" yesterday.
orange March 13, 2011 9:38 am

But in order to keep it as simple and as flowing of a game that it is, sometimes shit happens that breaks your heart. It just happened to be Ireland who "took one for the team" yesterday.
wow-jiffy-lube March 13, 2011 9:49 am

And he did see it, you can see him acknowledge Rees and step back to give him space to throw.
wow-jiffy-lube March 13, 2011 9:49 am

And he did see it, you can see him acknowledge Rees and step back to give him space to throw.
Anonymous March 13, 2011 9:50 am

Not even in the first half of this very game? (no forward pass that rolled 2 metres along the ground?)
Suck it up, there are multiple refereeing mistakes in EVERY game.
Anonymous March 13, 2011 9:50 am

Not even in the first half of this very game? (no forward pass that rolled 2 metres along the ground?)
Suck it up, there are multiple refereeing mistakes in EVERY game.
JStrafe March 13, 2011 9:55 am

Also, what if you get a scrum in a winning position from a ref error and then score a try on the next play. Wasn't the incorrect decision in the play before just as significant as anything else? Where do you draw the line?
JStrafe March 13, 2011 9:55 am

Also, what if you get a scrum in a winning position from a ref error and then score a try on the next play. Wasn't the incorrect decision in the play before just as significant as anything else? Where do you draw the line?
Anonymous March 13, 2011 9:57 am

Haha Ireland.
Anonymous March 13, 2011 9:57 am

Haha Ireland.
Anonymous March 13, 2011 10:09 am

Luckily fate rectified itself in the second half and allowed Phillips' try.
Anonymous March 13, 2011 10:09 am

Luckily fate rectified itself in the second half and allowed Phillips' try.
Anonymous March 13, 2011 10:43 am

Where was the TMO?
Anonymous March 13, 2011 10:43 am

Where was the TMO?
Anonymous March 13, 2011 11:14 am

I've been buying Lucky Charms cereal for years and they've never brought me any luck, but I don't complain.
Anonymous March 13, 2011 11:14 am

I've been buying Lucky Charms cereal for years and they've never brought me any luck, but I don't complain.
David March 13, 2011 11:14 am

All that being said, there was some TERRIBLE decisions on both sides, alot of iffy calls that went irelands way too. And at many points in the game you kind of felt it was irelands game to lose, the silly penalties and the forward passes (Well the ones that they were actually penalised for!)
Such a shame as wales ireland is normally a cracking game.
David March 13, 2011 11:14 am

All that being said, there was some TERRIBLE decisions on both sides, alot of iffy calls that went irelands way too. And at many points in the game you kind of felt it was irelands game to lose, the silly penalties and the forward passes (Well the ones that they were actually penalised for!)
Such a shame as wales ireland is normally a cracking game.
GF March 13, 2011 11:14 am

GF March 13, 2011 11:14 am

Anonymous March 13, 2011 11:35 am

Anonymous March 13, 2011 11:35 am

Anonymous March 13, 2011 11:39 am

Remember back to the world cup, Ireland; Georgia were unfairly denied and they didn't have 30 minutes to sort it out. So suck it up, deal with it. It happens to everyone, but the media only cares when it's a 'big' nation like Ireland or England.
Wouldn't hear anything of it if it were Scotland or Wales who had this try scored against them. About time some decisions went against you.
Anyone else think that a bronze statue of the ballboy should be built in Cardiff?
Anonymous March 13, 2011 11:39 am

Remember back to the world cup, Ireland; Georgia were unfairly denied and they didn't have 30 minutes to sort it out. So suck it up, deal with it. It happens to everyone, but the media only cares when it's a 'big' nation like Ireland or England.
Wouldn't hear anything of it if it were Scotland or Wales who had this try scored against them. About time some decisions went against you.
Anyone else think that a bronze statue of the ballboy should be built in Cardiff?
Anonymous March 13, 2011 11:43 am

Wouldn't hear anything of it if it were Scotland or Wales who had this try scored against them. About time some decisions went against you. "
What the hell are you going on about? Scotland and Wales are just as big a rugby nation as Ireland. And the media would do the same for them. Anyway I think most of the Irish fans have moved on, you don't see any of them crying for a rematch do you.
Anonymous March 13, 2011 11:43 am

Wouldn't hear anything of it if it were Scotland or Wales who had this try scored against them. About time some decisions went against you. "
What the hell are you going on about? Scotland and Wales are just as big a rugby nation as Ireland. And the media would do the same for them. Anyway I think most of the Irish fans have moved on, you don't see any of them crying for a rematch do you.
Anonymous March 13, 2011 11:51 am

If it's legal to take a lineout like that, then the throw was straight (enough by today's standards?)and nothing wrong has been done. Maybe Kaplan just wanted the game to flow a bit, but realised it had a big impact on the game when the 9 crossed the line?
Anonymous March 13, 2011 11:51 am

If it's legal to take a lineout like that, then the throw was straight (enough by today's standards?)and nothing wrong has been done. Maybe Kaplan just wanted the game to flow a bit, but realised it had a big impact on the game when the 9 crossed the line?
Anonymous March 13, 2011 12:01 pm

Anonymous March 13, 2011 12:01 pm

MuffHunter March 13, 2011 12:03 pm

MuffHunter March 13, 2011 12:03 pm

Sam March 13, 2011 12:10 pm

I wanted Ireland to win this game but like someone said they still could have won it.... But to those of you asking why Ireland are complaining? Because it should not have been a try... And I think the fact it was 100% clear it should not have been a try sort of says it all...
I think jonathan Davies summed it up, "ask the man upstairs, 'was that the same ball or not?' no? No try!" less than 30 seconds....
Either that or ask the touch judges to switch on!!!!!
Sam March 13, 2011 12:10 pm

I wanted Ireland to win this game but like someone said they still could have won it.... But to those of you asking why Ireland are complaining? Because it should not have been a try... And I think the fact it was 100% clear it should not have been a try sort of says it all...
I think jonathan Davies summed it up, "ask the man upstairs, 'was that the same ball or not?' no? No try!" less than 30 seconds....
Either that or ask the touch judges to switch on!!!!!
Stag March 13, 2011 12:11 pm

Stag March 13, 2011 12:11 pm

Sonny Bill's 10ft ar March 13, 2011 12:13 pm

His justification? "Ireland had one or two high tackles on us as well, but it's tough for the referee to pick everything up."
Really? Also, as mentioned, Wales got away with plenty at the breakdown. I don't think Phillips realizes that their "luck" extended to more than just one part of that game.
On a side-note, the Italy-France match was a better game of rugby anyways. What was with all the ping-pong rugby the Irish and Welsh were playing?
Sonny Bill's 10ft ar March 13, 2011 12:13 pm

His justification? "Ireland had one or two high tackles on us as well, but it's tough for the referee to pick everything up."
Really? Also, as mentioned, Wales got away with plenty at the breakdown. I don't think Phillips realizes that their "luck" extended to more than just one part of that game.
On a side-note, the Italy-France match was a better game of rugby anyways. What was with all the ping-pong rugby the Irish and Welsh were playing?
thomas fr March 13, 2011 12:45 pm

thomas fr March 13, 2011 12:45 pm

Jammers March 13, 2011 12:48 pm

If it's legal to take a lineout like that, then the throw was straight (enough by today's standards?)and nothing wrong has been done. Maybe Kaplan just wanted the game to flow a bit, but realised it had a big impact on the game when the 9 crossed the line?"
The line out was not set. Forming a line out: 19.8 (a) Minimum. At least two players from each team must form a lineout. Wales had no players except Phillips who ran onto it and there were no Irish players. It was a quick and so the same ball had to have been used.
As for Phillips, he has always been arrogant and confrontational. You wouldn't expect any other reaction from him (both after the try and after the match).
Even by the NH standard, the was a particularly poor game.
Jammers March 13, 2011 12:48 pm

If it's legal to take a lineout like that, then the throw was straight (enough by today's standards?)and nothing wrong has been done. Maybe Kaplan just wanted the game to flow a bit, but realised it had a big impact on the game when the 9 crossed the line?"
The line out was not set. Forming a line out: 19.8 (a) Minimum. At least two players from each team must form a lineout. Wales had no players except Phillips who ran onto it and there were no Irish players. It was a quick and so the same ball had to have been used.
As for Phillips, he has always been arrogant and confrontational. You wouldn't expect any other reaction from him (both after the try and after the match).
Even by the NH standard, the was a particularly poor game.
Maximus March 13, 2011 1:26 pm

Let the action finish, check it out and act accordingly. How can't it be THAT simple?
And, since i'm throwing ideas in the wind, use special former front rower refs for scrums.
We have a beautiful game and pretty decent rules, let's just ref them simply and consistently.
Maximus March 13, 2011 1:26 pm

Let the action finish, check it out and act accordingly. How can't it be THAT simple?
And, since i'm throwing ideas in the wind, use special former front rower refs for scrums.
We have a beautiful game and pretty decent rules, let's just ref them simply and consistently.
Anonymous March 13, 2011 1:29 pm

Anonymous March 13, 2011 1:29 pm

Calon Lan March 13, 2011 1:42 pm

Should it have been a try? Not a achance..
Was it a try? Yes, once it's been given, in reference to that match, it's a try.
It is possible the IRB will look into what can be done in these situations but that's separate to the given result.
Unfortunately, mistakes are made and Ireland got hit by a big one this time.
I don't think it's ever as simple as if it didn't happen Ireland would have won as the mach from start to finish was littered with errors on behalf of the officials and both teams benefited from the mistakes.
Rees was given the match ball (It's not up to him to question whether it's the correct one, thats what the officials are there for) and he was quite right to do what he did. You must play what you're given and trust that the officials will do their jobs.
Ireland have every right to be pissed off about what happened as I am as a Welsh player/fan. I however know the game well enough to understand that decisions will sometimes go your way and sometimes they go against you and as pissed of as you are, once a decision has been made you get back to doing your job.
It's impossible to predict what would have happened if the decision had been different or if the decisions were different when Ireland were given two penalties that should have clearly gone to Wales.
It's a shame that it happened but it has happened and the match is over.
Both teams were really poor, both teams suffered with poor decisions but the match is over.
I know people will complain and they will be right to but players are quite rightly not going to turn down a try that has been award to them.
I don't want to hear players saying...
"Sorry ref, I was offside when I turned over that ball which we just used to score a try."
"You know what, there was an arm under that ball when I was trying to score but you couldn't see it due to there being eight people on top of me."
"My lineout wasn't straight, do you want to give it to the other team instead of us having the seven points? I'd really rather you did."
"I know we just scored but I went in really early in the scrum, do you mind if I just go and sit in the sin bin for ten minutes?"
Anyway, bloody awful match all round and I got no pleasure from any of it.
Having said that, I was on the edge of my seat and jumped up with a shout when Italy beat France. So happy for them, they've worked harder than any other team this year.
They could have beat Wales, they really should have beat Ireland and they played better than both of us.
Well done to all of them, you should be proud of yourselves for what you've achieved this year. The real test will be if it can be sustained over the next couple of years.
Calon Lan March 13, 2011 1:42 pm

Should it have been a try? Not a achance..
Was it a try? Yes, once it's been given, in reference to that match, it's a try.
It is possible the IRB will look into what can be done in these situations but that's separate to the given result.
Unfortunately, mistakes are made and Ireland got hit by a big one this time.
I don't think it's ever as simple as if it didn't happen Ireland would have won as the mach from start to finish was littered with errors on behalf of the officials and both teams benefited from the mistakes.
Rees was given the match ball (It's not up to him to question whether it's the correct one, thats what the officials are there for) and he was quite right to do what he did. You must play what you're given and trust that the officials will do their jobs.
Ireland have every right to be pissed off about what happened as I am as a Welsh player/fan. I however know the game well enough to understand that decisions will sometimes go your way and sometimes they go against you and as pissed of as you are, once a decision has been made you get back to doing your job.
It's impossible to predict what would have happened if the decision had been different or if the decisions were different when Ireland were given two penalties that should have clearly gone to Wales.
It's a shame that it happened but it has happened and the match is over.
Both teams were really poor, both teams suffered with poor decisions but the match is over.
I know people will complain and they will be right to but players are quite rightly not going to turn down a try that has been award to them.
I don't want to hear players saying...
"Sorry ref, I was offside when I turned over that ball which we just used to score a try."
"You know what, there was an arm under that ball when I was trying to score but you couldn't see it due to there being eight people on top of me."
"My lineout wasn't straight, do you want to give it to the other team instead of us having the seven points? I'd really rather you did."
"I know we just scored but I went in really early in the scrum, do you mind if I just go and sit in the sin bin for ten minutes?"
Anyway, bloody awful match all round and I got no pleasure from any of it.
Having said that, I was on the edge of my seat and jumped up with a shout when Italy beat France. So happy for them, they've worked harder than any other team this year.
They could have beat Wales, they really should have beat Ireland and they played better than both of us.
Well done to all of them, you should be proud of yourselves for what you've achieved this year. The real test will be if it can be sustained over the next couple of years.
Peter Allen is a mes March 13, 2011 2:07 pm

And for people who are saying that there's no point in complaining because it's over; what do you expect? Should we congratulate that idiot Peter Allen and be happy with the fact that we were robbed?
Peter Allen is a mes March 13, 2011 2:07 pm

And for people who are saying that there's no point in complaining because it's over; what do you expect? Should we congratulate that idiot Peter Allen and be happy with the fact that we were robbed?
Anonymous March 13, 2011 2:11 pm

Anonymous March 13, 2011 2:11 pm

Anonymous March 13, 2011 2:11 pm

I reckon any team in the super 15 would beat this rubbish.
Anonymous March 13, 2011 2:11 pm

I reckon any team in the super 15 would beat this rubbish.
Andy March 13, 2011 2:22 pm

Haha! people like you make me laugh. I can even picture what you look like.
Andy March 13, 2011 2:22 pm

Haha! people like you make me laugh. I can even picture what you look like.
Anonymous March 13, 2011 2:41 pm

Anonymous March 13, 2011 2:41 pm

Anonymous March 13, 2011 3:51 pm

Not nice to see the Irish crowding and yelling at the ref, and not nice to see the Welsh win by cheating.
Personally I don't like either team, I think they get away with murder all the time.
Wish referees would get their act together though. If in doubt, go upstairs.
Anonymous March 13, 2011 3:51 pm

Not nice to see the Irish crowding and yelling at the ref, and not nice to see the Welsh win by cheating.
Personally I don't like either team, I think they get away with murder all the time.
Wish referees would get their act together though. If in doubt, go upstairs.
Anonymous March 13, 2011 4:24 pm

Anonymous March 13, 2011 4:24 pm

Anonymous March 13, 2011 5:45 pm

That said I thought it was a very poor match, actually I think the whole 6 nations has been very poor. Bring on the Tri Nations in the summer a bit of quality rugby
Anonymous March 13, 2011 5:45 pm

That said I thought it was a very poor match, actually I think the whole 6 nations has been very poor. Bring on the Tri Nations in the summer a bit of quality rugby
Stephen March 13, 2011 6:07 pm

But where does one draw the line? Hands in the ruck are just as illegal as what happened yesterday, but it seems to be more "acceptable" to some. I'm sorry, but the rules are the rules, and crossing the line by an inch is as bad as crossing by a mile. Cheating is cheating. If Ireland have cheated (which they have a reputation for), then they should shut the hell up about this case.
That said, if we wanted to go down the TMO line, then we'd lose the spirit of the game, which, with so much happening on the field, is always open to abuse and subjective assessment (by the ref). I actually like the fact that the ref can use personal judgement (for example when issuing yellow cards).
But I'm still ashamed of our win yesterday.
Stephen March 13, 2011 6:07 pm

But where does one draw the line? Hands in the ruck are just as illegal as what happened yesterday, but it seems to be more "acceptable" to some. I'm sorry, but the rules are the rules, and crossing the line by an inch is as bad as crossing by a mile. Cheating is cheating. If Ireland have cheated (which they have a reputation for), then they should shut the hell up about this case.
That said, if we wanted to go down the TMO line, then we'd lose the spirit of the game, which, with so much happening on the field, is always open to abuse and subjective assessment (by the ref). I actually like the fact that the ref can use personal judgement (for example when issuing yellow cards).
But I'm still ashamed of our win yesterday.
Was that a knock on? March 13, 2011 6:15 pm

Was that a knock on? March 13, 2011 6:15 pm

David March 13, 2011 6:22 pm

-
-
-
PLEAAAAAASE. Every team pushes the limits of the law and would take a dodgy try, whether it be from something like this, or say a forward pass.
Bad decision i know, but put the violin away.
David March 13, 2011 6:22 pm

-
-
-
PLEAAAAAASE. Every team pushes the limits of the law and would take a dodgy try, whether it be from something like this, or say a forward pass.
Bad decision i know, but put the violin away.
Anonymous March 13, 2011 6:42 pm

Best of luck to Wales against the french. Hope we can bounce back v england but dosent look likely :( Kidney isnt picking our form team Cullen, Cronin, McCloughlin, McFadden, Trimble, Boss, Carr, Duffy should be given a chance at least!
Congrats to Italy too, they should have 3 wins this vear really.
Roll on next week!
Tom (Eire)
Anonymous March 13, 2011 6:42 pm

Best of luck to Wales against the french. Hope we can bounce back v england but dosent look likely :( Kidney isnt picking our form team Cullen, Cronin, McCloughlin, McFadden, Trimble, Boss, Carr, Duffy should be given a chance at least!
Congrats to Italy too, they should have 3 wins this vear really.
Roll on next week!
Tom (Eire)
Billy March 13, 2011 6:47 pm

Billy March 13, 2011 6:47 pm

dbompas1 March 13, 2011 7:06 pm

but I THINK QUICK LINEOUTS SHOULD ALWAYS BE POSSIBLE TO ALLOW A MORE FLUID GAME
dbompas1 March 13, 2011 7:06 pm

but I THINK QUICK LINEOUTS SHOULD ALWAYS BE POSSIBLE TO ALLOW A MORE FLUID GAME
Sean March 13, 2011 7:50 pm

(I use that term loosely as whatever happened Wales could have ended up scoring numerous penalties, or legitimate tries)
The fact is it does raise the question on going to the TMO about this stuff...
I saw in todays game england vs scotland, that it happened years ago against france. So part of me thinks 'well it has happened before' but the other part thinks, its happened once before, donkeys years ago.. so is it worth the effort?
I think in the context of this game, Ireland...my home team..put it this way, i've accepted the fact this tournament is down the pan, long before the wales game...so Im not too cut up about it. However the big question you ALL need to ask yourselves is:
'what if this was RWC final game with your team?'
I do not want to see the ref asking the guy upstairs for every bloody decision because he gets every angle...but it does bring about the question of a BIG BIG game...
I see a lot of SH fans having a dig at us Irish boys saying 'cry over this cry over that' trust me, you don't even need to try against Ireland, we'll hand you the points... but it raises a BIG talking point. What if it was one of your boys teams, say the saffas or NZ...I mean I'd only hope that in light of this f*ck up by the touch judge that it will be a very clear cut area (as in todays game) but if its not and we can all sit here in our homes watching it on a screen and seeing replay after replay that it was NOT supposed to be a try, do we want it to be an ability for the refs to have or not?
On note of todays game, how many other of you folk thought 'oh why oh why does that prick haskell have to be man of the match' The guy just loves himself..
Sean March 13, 2011 7:50 pm

(I use that term loosely as whatever happened Wales could have ended up scoring numerous penalties, or legitimate tries)
The fact is it does raise the question on going to the TMO about this stuff...
I saw in todays game england vs scotland, that it happened years ago against france. So part of me thinks 'well it has happened before' but the other part thinks, its happened once before, donkeys years ago.. so is it worth the effort?
I think in the context of this game, Ireland...my home team..put it this way, i've accepted the fact this tournament is down the pan, long before the wales game...so Im not too cut up about it. However the big question you ALL need to ask yourselves is:
'what if this was RWC final game with your team?'
I do not want to see the ref asking the guy upstairs for every bloody decision because he gets every angle...but it does bring about the question of a BIG BIG game...
I see a lot of SH fans having a dig at us Irish boys saying 'cry over this cry over that' trust me, you don't even need to try against Ireland, we'll hand you the points... but it raises a BIG talking point. What if it was one of your boys teams, say the saffas or NZ...I mean I'd only hope that in light of this f*ck up by the touch judge that it will be a very clear cut area (as in todays game) but if its not and we can all sit here in our homes watching it on a screen and seeing replay after replay that it was NOT supposed to be a try, do we want it to be an ability for the refs to have or not?
On note of todays game, how many other of you folk thought 'oh why oh why does that prick haskell have to be man of the match' The guy just loves himself..
Sean March 13, 2011 7:53 pm

Saying Rees cheated is pathetic...he did nothing more than take a chance. What about numerous players in every game playing the ball on the ground...its the same thing and its part of the game...(an illegal part, but a part nonetheless..)
Sean March 13, 2011 7:53 pm

Saying Rees cheated is pathetic...he did nothing more than take a chance. What about numerous players in every game playing the ball on the ground...its the same thing and its part of the game...(an illegal part, but a part nonetheless..)
Anonymous March 13, 2011 8:38 pm

Ire led all the offensive stats, more passes, kicks, line breaks, turn overs, off loads (yes, Ire actually offloaded more than another team, okay, 6 to 3).
Wonder what players 'tweets' to their fans will be now!
Anonymous March 13, 2011 8:38 pm

Ire led all the offensive stats, more passes, kicks, line breaks, turn overs, off loads (yes, Ire actually offloaded more than another team, okay, 6 to 3).
Wonder what players 'tweets' to their fans will be now!
rehanbb March 13, 2011 9:20 pm

tough call but i hope wales can take the 6n instead of england, then ireland's sacrifice will be worth it
rehanbb March 13, 2011 9:20 pm

tough call but i hope wales can take the 6n instead of england, then ireland's sacrifice will be worth it
(: March 13, 2011 10:00 pm

England is 67
so thats 42 points if my tired maths is correct that England need to lose, or wales need to gain...
I dont see wales putting 42 points or even 21 un replied points on France, and I do not see Ireland putting 21 unreplied points on England..
So i think its safe to say this years RBS 6 nations champions are England, all that remains now is the Grand Slam...
Hopefully Ireland can upset that.
(: I was hoping Scotland would do it today but sadly it was not to be due to that DUBIOUS yellow card!!!!
(: March 13, 2011 10:00 pm

England is 67
so thats 42 points if my tired maths is correct that England need to lose, or wales need to gain...
I dont see wales putting 42 points or even 21 un replied points on France, and I do not see Ireland putting 21 unreplied points on England..
So i think its safe to say this years RBS 6 nations champions are England, all that remains now is the Grand Slam...
Hopefully Ireland can upset that.
(: I was hoping Scotland would do it today but sadly it was not to be due to that DUBIOUS yellow card!!!!
Eire go Bre March 13, 2011 10:02 pm

Would love to see the irish players react by scoring rather than roaring at the ref. Understandable of course, but we should have been out of reach by that stage.
I think it was a case of the worst team losing rather than the best team winning, in that out of 2 terrible displays, Irelands was the most error ridden. 51 errors in 4 games now for Ireland, and we could have lost all 4! Lets hope they can put up a good game to finish on a high!
Eire go Bre March 13, 2011 10:02 pm

Would love to see the irish players react by scoring rather than roaring at the ref. Understandable of course, but we should have been out of reach by that stage.
I think it was a case of the worst team losing rather than the best team winning, in that out of 2 terrible displays, Irelands was the most error ridden. 51 errors in 4 games now for Ireland, and we could have lost all 4! Lets hope they can put up a good game to finish on a high!
Colombes March 13, 2011 10:08 pm

It was a mistake by the touch ref, but he didnt imagine the cheat possible. Whatever, sad for the Spirit but wales dominated the match.
Regarding the 3 encounters of the we, the game level is low. None of the nh teams are ready for the rwc. The 3 summer months of prparation Will be a luxe!
Colombes March 13, 2011 10:08 pm

It was a mistake by the touch ref, but he didnt imagine the cheat possible. Whatever, sad for the Spirit but wales dominated the match.
Regarding the 3 encounters of the we, the game level is low. None of the nh teams are ready for the rwc. The 3 summer months of prparation Will be a luxe!
BackAche March 13, 2011 10:19 pm

Ireland butchered a try and the kicking was shocking, so deserved to lose.
BackAche March 13, 2011 10:19 pm

Ireland butchered a try and the kicking was shocking, so deserved to lose.
Beast4president March 13, 2011 10:26 pm

Beast4president March 13, 2011 10:26 pm

themull March 13, 2011 11:53 pm

If any of you's claim it would simpy make the game drag on, you's must not pay much attention to the state the scrummage situation in rugby union is in...Scrums more often than not last more than a minute most of which is taken up by resetting and the ref giving out...
All he has to do, if there is any doubt whatsoever...Ask the TMO, was it the same ball? One look at it...No ref...Now play on....
I for one would much rather see the right calls made on the day instead of fuck ups like this to be honest..even if a couple of minutes are added onto the game....
themull March 13, 2011 11:53 pm

If any of you's claim it would simpy make the game drag on, you's must not pay much attention to the state the scrummage situation in rugby union is in...Scrums more often than not last more than a minute most of which is taken up by resetting and the ref giving out...
All he has to do, if there is any doubt whatsoever...Ask the TMO, was it the same ball? One look at it...No ref...Now play on....
I for one would much rather see the right calls made on the day instead of fuck ups like this to be honest..even if a couple of minutes are added onto the game....
Ted March 14, 2011 1:11 am

Ted March 14, 2011 1:11 am

Anonymous March 14, 2011 1:30 am

Anonymous March 14, 2011 1:30 am

Jono March 14, 2011 3:40 am

Not kaplan's fault that's the touch judges responsibility.
Ireland have every right to feel pissed off.
That touch judge should get the sack.
Jono March 14, 2011 3:40 am

Not kaplan's fault that's the touch judges responsibility.
Ireland have every right to feel pissed off.
That touch judge should get the sack.
John Connor March 14, 2011 3:40 am

Too often in rugby, officials have a match winning influence on games. A bias can set in, and it seems in vogue to penalise the Irish at the breakdown, Fact is that Wales infringed just as much at the breakdown as Ireland did and did not get penalised as often. But for officials to get a decision as wrong as Allan did is unacceptable. He was asked "Was it the same ball?" he replied "yes". And he said so emphatically - he wanted that 'try' to stand.
I have never subscribed to the notion that bad decisions even themselves out. Two wrongs don't make a right. Anyone who loves rugby should condemn that 'try', particularly the Welsh whose acheivements in this tournament have been tainted as a result.
We saw some ugly rugby - and Wales played half of it!
John Connor March 14, 2011 3:40 am

Too often in rugby, officials have a match winning influence on games. A bias can set in, and it seems in vogue to penalise the Irish at the breakdown, Fact is that Wales infringed just as much at the breakdown as Ireland did and did not get penalised as often. But for officials to get a decision as wrong as Allan did is unacceptable. He was asked "Was it the same ball?" he replied "yes". And he said so emphatically - he wanted that 'try' to stand.
I have never subscribed to the notion that bad decisions even themselves out. Two wrongs don't make a right. Anyone who loves rugby should condemn that 'try', particularly the Welsh whose acheivements in this tournament have been tainted as a result.
We saw some ugly rugby - and Wales played half of it!
Anonymous March 14, 2011 8:40 am

Anonymous March 14, 2011 8:40 am

Eoghan March 14, 2011 9:01 am

Kaplan asked Allen whether the right ball was used. Allen said definitively 'Yes'. That was an awful response. If he genuinely thought the right ball was used, he either doesn't know the rules (unlikely) or was hallucinating.
If he was unsure as to whether the right ball was used (more likely) he should have said so.
Had he said 'I don't know', I have a strong suspicion that Kaplan would have referred it to the TMO asking the question 'Try or no Try'. An astute TMO would have started the replay from the quick throw and I believe would have alerted Kaplan not to award the try.
Just a hunch.
Anyway Ireland played so badly they have no moral claim on the game at all.
BTW I believe there is a link on rugbdump of Kaplan getting foxed like this before in a Super 14 game a couple of seasons ago.
Eoghan March 14, 2011 9:01 am

Kaplan asked Allen whether the right ball was used. Allen said definitively 'Yes'. That was an awful response. If he genuinely thought the right ball was used, he either doesn't know the rules (unlikely) or was hallucinating.
If he was unsure as to whether the right ball was used (more likely) he should have said so.
Had he said 'I don't know', I have a strong suspicion that Kaplan would have referred it to the TMO asking the question 'Try or no Try'. An astute TMO would have started the replay from the quick throw and I believe would have alerted Kaplan not to award the try.
Just a hunch.
Anyway Ireland played so badly they have no moral claim on the game at all.
BTW I believe there is a link on rugbdump of Kaplan getting foxed like this before in a Super 14 game a couple of seasons ago.
Von March 14, 2011 9:03 am

Rugby's inherent sense of fair play has always been one of the most appealing things about the game for me. One of the main things that got me into the game in the first place in fact. I despise the very word "gamesmanship" as it implies something more honourable than what it actually means: i.e. cheating.
I was sickened to see England trying exactly the same lineout ruse yesterday, even after all the controversy on Saturday and would have been as ashamed as Stephen was had England scored.
On the decision itself, same ball or not is only part of the reason the quick lineout shouldn't have been allowed. If the ball touches anyone you can't take a quick throw. Everyone knows this. So the simple fact that the ballboy has passed a ball (any ball) to Rees immediately procludes a quick lineout from being taken.
Von March 14, 2011 9:03 am

Rugby's inherent sense of fair play has always been one of the most appealing things about the game for me. One of the main things that got me into the game in the first place in fact. I despise the very word "gamesmanship" as it implies something more honourable than what it actually means: i.e. cheating.
I was sickened to see England trying exactly the same lineout ruse yesterday, even after all the controversy on Saturday and would have been as ashamed as Stephen was had England scored.
On the decision itself, same ball or not is only part of the reason the quick lineout shouldn't have been allowed. If the ball touches anyone you can't take a quick throw. Everyone knows this. So the simple fact that the ballboy has passed a ball (any ball) to Rees immediately procludes a quick lineout from being taken.
David March 14, 2011 10:09 am

Every team will take any chance they can get.
David March 14, 2011 10:09 am

Every team will take any chance they can get.
Anonymous March 14, 2011 10:29 am

Ireland v South Africa in 2004 benefited from a similar decision which led to the match winning try. (Smit was told to have a word, got them in a huddle and O'Gara took a quick tap to score a try.) South Africa that day lamented the fact they had chances later on. Can we please follow that example. We were rubbish on the day and simply got what we deserved.
Anonymous March 14, 2011 10:29 am

Ireland v South Africa in 2004 benefited from a similar decision which led to the match winning try. (Smit was told to have a word, got them in a huddle and O'Gara took a quick tap to score a try.) South Africa that day lamented the fact they had chances later on. Can we please follow that example. We were rubbish on the day and simply got what we deserved.
katman March 14, 2011 10:41 am

katman March 14, 2011 10:41 am

Anonymous March 14, 2011 10:47 am

Irrrrreland Irrrrreland, Forrrrrever standing tall, crying their eyes out, 'cause Wales used the wrong ball!!!
Anonymous March 14, 2011 10:47 am

Irrrrreland Irrrrreland, Forrrrrever standing tall, crying their eyes out, 'cause Wales used the wrong ball!!!
ForzaaaaItaliaaa March 14, 2011 11:02 am

England stole their match with a try with 2 forward pass!
So ashamed for them if they go to the Grand Slam with it!
Scotland deserved to win!
ForzaaaaItaliaaa March 14, 2011 11:02 am

England stole their match with a try with 2 forward pass!
So ashamed for them if they go to the Grand Slam with it!
Scotland deserved to win!
Anonymous March 14, 2011 11:04 am

Especially when you opted to ignore a run in try in the last minute in order to get closer to the posts.
We deserved to lose.
Kaplans incompetence aside.
Anonymous March 14, 2011 11:04 am

Especially when you opted to ignore a run in try in the last minute in order to get closer to the posts.
We deserved to lose.
Kaplans incompetence aside.
ForzaaaaItaliaaa March 14, 2011 11:05 am

If you release the guy he can continue if you don't release im you are penalised...
eeerf...thanks mate for the pro english refering all the way!
ForzaaaaItaliaaa March 14, 2011 11:05 am

If you release the guy he can continue if you don't release im you are penalised...
eeerf...thanks mate for the pro english refering all the way!
fry March 14, 2011 11:38 am

I'm 23 and feel the same way.
If you were sickened it must happen ALL the time watching international rugby the Von...
Yeah, I sort of am.
And I get that those examples given by Calon Lan are meant to highlight the ridiculousness of what it would be if players were truly self-polcied, but yeah, part of me does this that while I may not say, "Hey, sir...I actually dropped the ball when I was an inch from the ground in the tackle, so technically, it was a knock-on", I'll still feel a bit gypped that I didn't go about it the right way, so I'd be thinking that I really ought to vindicate myself by scoring again, but in a totally legal way.
The fact that this was the only try scored by Wales is the only thing that sucks about this situation.
As a lot of people have said, both teams sucked ass and neither really deserved it. But had Wales scored a legitimate try afterwards, it would've more than made up for the fact that their only one came from a bullshit call.
But then again, if people really think that Ireland's try came from one as well, then fair enough. Same goes for them.
fry March 14, 2011 11:38 am

I'm 23 and feel the same way.
If you were sickened it must happen ALL the time watching international rugby the Von...
Yeah, I sort of am.
And I get that those examples given by Calon Lan are meant to highlight the ridiculousness of what it would be if players were truly self-polcied, but yeah, part of me does this that while I may not say, "Hey, sir...I actually dropped the ball when I was an inch from the ground in the tackle, so technically, it was a knock-on", I'll still feel a bit gypped that I didn't go about it the right way, so I'd be thinking that I really ought to vindicate myself by scoring again, but in a totally legal way.
The fact that this was the only try scored by Wales is the only thing that sucks about this situation.
As a lot of people have said, both teams sucked ass and neither really deserved it. But had Wales scored a legitimate try afterwards, it would've more than made up for the fact that their only one came from a bullshit call.
But then again, if people really think that Ireland's try came from one as well, then fair enough. Same goes for them.
Anonymous March 14, 2011 12:12 pm

1. When you take a quick throw from a out on the full kick its from where the ball crossed the line not from the kicker took the kick (where it was taken from)
2. Someone who was not a player touched the ball.
3. It was not the same ball.
4. The hooker was actually on the field not off it when he threw it in.
For a touch judge and ref to miss all 4 is incredulous
Anonymous March 14, 2011 12:12 pm

1. When you take a quick throw from a out on the full kick its from where the ball crossed the line not from the kicker took the kick (where it was taken from)
2. Someone who was not a player touched the ball.
3. It was not the same ball.
4. The hooker was actually on the field not off it when he threw it in.
For a touch judge and ref to miss all 4 is incredulous
Anonymous March 14, 2011 12:30 pm

Also, Gatland deserves some bashing with his comment. That's not luck, that's cheating. The Welsh knew it wasn't the same ball.
Anonymous March 14, 2011 12:30 pm

Also, Gatland deserves some bashing with his comment. That's not luck, that's cheating. The Welsh knew it wasn't the same ball.
Anonymous March 14, 2011 12:35 pm

"1. When you take a quick throw from a out on the full kick its from where the ball crossed the line not from the kicker took the kick (where it was taken from)"
You can throw it in anywhere from the try line up to the point where the ball crossed the line on a quick throw.
Anonymous March 14, 2011 12:35 pm

"1. When you take a quick throw from a out on the full kick its from where the ball crossed the line not from the kicker took the kick (where it was taken from)"
You can throw it in anywhere from the try line up to the point where the ball crossed the line on a quick throw.
Anonymous March 14, 2011 12:39 pm

Anonymous March 14, 2011 12:39 pm

Zavala March 14, 2011 1:01 pm

Sorry, but this is a personal bugbear for me.
Zavala March 14, 2011 1:01 pm

Sorry, but this is a personal bugbear for me.
Stephen March 14, 2011 2:09 pm

Let's face it: there's so much happening on the pitch that it's impossible for the ref to catch it all, so yes, mistakes will be made.
I disagree that the error was the touch judge's fault, as Kaplan would have been within his rights to question the decision. Perhaps it was the sheer audacity of the move that meant that he didn't even consider foul play.
We surely don't want rugby to go the way of American Football (spit!) which has all enjoyment and flow policed out of it. So a subjective imperfect solution is what we're going to get, and we can only hope for sharp-eyed, judicious and fair-minded referees.
So, despite my being peeved at the ugliness of the goings-on on Saturday, it's something I'm simply going to have to come to terms with, if I want to enjoy me rugger.
(As a side note: when I did play rugby - many, many moons ago, I *was* self-policing). Honesty and integrity meant something to me.
Stephen March 14, 2011 2:09 pm

Let's face it: there's so much happening on the pitch that it's impossible for the ref to catch it all, so yes, mistakes will be made.
I disagree that the error was the touch judge's fault, as Kaplan would have been within his rights to question the decision. Perhaps it was the sheer audacity of the move that meant that he didn't even consider foul play.
We surely don't want rugby to go the way of American Football (spit!) which has all enjoyment and flow policed out of it. So a subjective imperfect solution is what we're going to get, and we can only hope for sharp-eyed, judicious and fair-minded referees.
So, despite my being peeved at the ugliness of the goings-on on Saturday, it's something I'm simply going to have to come to terms with, if I want to enjoy me rugger.
(As a side note: when I did play rugby - many, many moons ago, I *was* self-policing). Honesty and integrity meant something to me.
Stephen March 14, 2011 2:12 pm

Stephen March 14, 2011 2:12 pm

Chris March 14, 2011 2:35 pm

1 - Clearly, not the same ball, and therefore there can be no quick throw-in.
2 - The Welsh player on the sidelines had his foot either on or over the touch line (in the field of play) when he threw in the ball... a lineout must be performed with both feet in touch; outside the field of play.
In other words, the touch-judge and ref screwed up not once, but twice!
Chris March 14, 2011 2:35 pm

1 - Clearly, not the same ball, and therefore there can be no quick throw-in.
2 - The Welsh player on the sidelines had his foot either on or over the touch line (in the field of play) when he threw in the ball... a lineout must be performed with both feet in touch; outside the field of play.
In other words, the touch-judge and ref screwed up not once, but twice!
Andy M March 14, 2011 2:35 pm

Andy M March 14, 2011 2:35 pm

Anonymous March 14, 2011 3:10 pm

On a side note, for the last 3 games Earls has been Ire' best defender, he hasn't dropped a single high ball under pressure (considering he's barely 5'10 and this has been held against him since the Lions), made massive tackles in all games when he had to and contrary to what George Hook says, his passing and distribution off both hands has improved a 100 fold. I think he has to be given the 12 or 15 jersey immediately. If he goes to 15, then Bowe should go to 12.
Bowe was dangerous every time he got the ball and because he's not getting it on the wing, give him a chance down the middle. D'arcy out, Mcfadden at least on the bench (maybe at 11 and drop Fitzgearld), a kick kick up the hole for Heaslip and Mclaughlin or Donnacha Ryan to come in somewhere (possibly for Leamy I hate to say).
Ryan adds height, 6'6, bulk (good scrummager), pace, carrying from deep and grunt thats lacking, and has good experience at 6 and does well alondside O'Connell.
Anonymous March 14, 2011 3:10 pm

On a side note, for the last 3 games Earls has been Ire' best defender, he hasn't dropped a single high ball under pressure (considering he's barely 5'10 and this has been held against him since the Lions), made massive tackles in all games when he had to and contrary to what George Hook says, his passing and distribution off both hands has improved a 100 fold. I think he has to be given the 12 or 15 jersey immediately. If he goes to 15, then Bowe should go to 12.
Bowe was dangerous every time he got the ball and because he's not getting it on the wing, give him a chance down the middle. D'arcy out, Mcfadden at least on the bench (maybe at 11 and drop Fitzgearld), a kick kick up the hole for Heaslip and Mclaughlin or Donnacha Ryan to come in somewhere (possibly for Leamy I hate to say).
Ryan adds height, 6'6, bulk (good scrummager), pace, carrying from deep and grunt thats lacking, and has good experience at 6 and does well alondside O'Connell.
Anonymous March 14, 2011 3:11 pm

The officials need to be hot on stuff like this and obviously there was no doubt in the officials mind thy it was the same ball.....so maybe he needs some specs?
Anonymous March 14, 2011 3:11 pm

The officials need to be hot on stuff like this and obviously there was no doubt in the officials mind thy it was the same ball.....so maybe he needs some specs?
JAY March 14, 2011 3:23 pm

The only disgraceful thing, other than the referee / touch judge, was Phillips' immediate reaction and his post match interview. I guess he knows that he didn't have the ability to do it without being handed the try by the officiators.
JAY March 14, 2011 3:23 pm

The only disgraceful thing, other than the referee / touch judge, was Phillips' immediate reaction and his post match interview. I guess he knows that he didn't have the ability to do it without being handed the try by the officiators.
Anonymous March 14, 2011 3:49 pm

Anonymous March 14, 2011 3:49 pm

Anonymous March 14, 2011 3:51 pm
Anonymous March 14, 2011 3:51 pm
Anonymous March 14, 2011 4:05 pm

Anonymous March 14, 2011 4:05 pm

Anonymous March 14, 2011 4:11 pm

Anonymous March 14, 2011 4:11 pm

amateur ref March 14, 2011 4:15 pm

anytime I'm refereeing a game and the ball is kicked towards the touchline, there is a simple sequence of events you need to go through.
1 - position of the kick relative to the 22m line (to thus determine if it's allowed out on the full or not)
2 - where the kick lands and if it goes into touch
3 - when the ball goes out of touch, where should the corresponding lineout take place and for whom.
It is at stage 3 that the ref needs to continue checking what happens to the ball since he must then decide where the lineout is to be taken and HOW. The touch judge's task should only be to make the mark - including the call about out on the full if necessary.
The ref should have kept his eye on the ball and as soon as he saw it went outside the playing enclosure AND was touched by someone apart from the thrower, his mind should have already decided "No quick line out allowed"
I have a lot of time for Mr Kaplan but i think he's made a really bad call here.
amateur ref March 14, 2011 4:15 pm

anytime I'm refereeing a game and the ball is kicked towards the touchline, there is a simple sequence of events you need to go through.
1 - position of the kick relative to the 22m line (to thus determine if it's allowed out on the full or not)
2 - where the kick lands and if it goes into touch
3 - when the ball goes out of touch, where should the corresponding lineout take place and for whom.
It is at stage 3 that the ref needs to continue checking what happens to the ball since he must then decide where the lineout is to be taken and HOW. The touch judge's task should only be to make the mark - including the call about out on the full if necessary.
The ref should have kept his eye on the ball and as soon as he saw it went outside the playing enclosure AND was touched by someone apart from the thrower, his mind should have already decided "No quick line out allowed"
I have a lot of time for Mr Kaplan but i think he's made a really bad call here.
Ian M March 14, 2011 5:39 pm

Ian M March 14, 2011 5:39 pm

Anonymous March 14, 2011 5:40 pm

What if the AR thought it was a quickly taken line out rather than a quick throw (QT)
Anonymous March 14, 2011 5:40 pm

What if the AR thought it was a quickly taken line out rather than a quick throw (QT)
Anonymous March 14, 2011 6:04 pm

Anonymous March 14, 2011 6:04 pm

Steve Munford March 14, 2011 6:09 pm

Steve Munford March 14, 2011 6:09 pm

Toby March 14, 2011 7:31 pm

But let's look at some facts shall we?
- Ireland should have been penalised at the second ruck of the game from which Lee Byrne's kick was charged down as ROG was off side (I was in line with it in the stands).
- Wallace should have been penalised for hands in the ruck around 10 minutes in, which would have resulted in a attempt in an eminently kickable position.
- There was a forward pass around 15 minutes in that was a good six yards forward.
- Roberts was penalised for being held in the tackle when he wasn't.
- A high tackle on Shane Williams went unpunished.
- 2 incidents of Irish crossing around 64 minutes.
So if, as I read, the IRB are going to apologise to Ireland for the try, will they also apologise to Wales for all these indiscretions? No, and nor should they because the game is played on the day and referees aren't perfect. I agree that use of the TMO should be looked at - a la rugby league where offsides, forward passes etc can be checked in the immediate build-up to a try.
Ireland should maybe have a look at their own game. Sexton misses a sitter in front of the posts, the kicking out of hand by ROG and Sexton was dreadful, handing the initiative back to Wales. And as for that last attack, the less said the better.
And to all those saying that Wales were infringing at ruck time, what planet are you on? Irish ball was far quicker coming back to Stringer (Wallace and O'Brien were awesome) and that gave them real momentum in their attacks and made them look far more dynamic than Wales who looked lethargic most of the time and had slow ball throughout the game.
Still, I think Ireland can beat England given home support. Make sure it's by at least 20 points boys.
Toby March 14, 2011 7:31 pm

But let's look at some facts shall we?
- Ireland should have been penalised at the second ruck of the game from which Lee Byrne's kick was charged down as ROG was off side (I was in line with it in the stands).
- Wallace should have been penalised for hands in the ruck around 10 minutes in, which would have resulted in a attempt in an eminently kickable position.
- There was a forward pass around 15 minutes in that was a good six yards forward.
- Roberts was penalised for being held in the tackle when he wasn't.
- A high tackle on Shane Williams went unpunished.
- 2 incidents of Irish crossing around 64 minutes.
So if, as I read, the IRB are going to apologise to Ireland for the try, will they also apologise to Wales for all these indiscretions? No, and nor should they because the game is played on the day and referees aren't perfect. I agree that use of the TMO should be looked at - a la rugby league where offsides, forward passes etc can be checked in the immediate build-up to a try.
Ireland should maybe have a look at their own game. Sexton misses a sitter in front of the posts, the kicking out of hand by ROG and Sexton was dreadful, handing the initiative back to Wales. And as for that last attack, the less said the better.
And to all those saying that Wales were infringing at ruck time, what planet are you on? Irish ball was far quicker coming back to Stringer (Wallace and O'Brien were awesome) and that gave them real momentum in their attacks and made them look far more dynamic than Wales who looked lethargic most of the time and had slow ball throughout the game.
Still, I think Ireland can beat England given home support. Make sure it's by at least 20 points boys.
Anonymous March 15, 2011 2:27 am

"1. When you take a quick throw from a out on the full kick its from where the ball crossed the line not from the kicker took the kick (where it was taken from)"
You can throw it in anywhere from the try line up to the point where the ball crossed the line on a quick throw.
Anonymous March 15, 2011 2:27 am

"1. When you take a quick throw from a out on the full kick its from where the ball crossed the line not from the kicker took the kick (where it was taken from)"
You can throw it in anywhere from the try line up to the point where the ball crossed the line on a quick throw.
Toby W March 15, 2011 9:50 am

Kaplan asks him 1st time is it the same ball, teh AR replies IT was a quickly taken line out (ie not a quick throw).
Kaplan asks again was it the correct ball AR says yes (because for a quickly taken throw it doesn't need to be the same ball).
In my view very poor questioning from Kaplan and AR wasn't clear enough.
Toby W March 15, 2011 9:50 am

Kaplan asks him 1st time is it the same ball, teh AR replies IT was a quickly taken line out (ie not a quick throw).
Kaplan asks again was it the correct ball AR says yes (because for a quickly taken throw it doesn't need to be the same ball).
In my view very poor questioning from Kaplan and AR wasn't clear enough.
Anonymous March 15, 2011 4:05 pm

"1. When you take a quick throw from a out on the full kick its from where the ball crossed the line not from the kicker took the kick (where it was taken from)"
You can throw it in anywhere from the try line up to the point where the ball crossed the line on a quick throw.
March 15, 2011 3:27 AM
Wrong, wrong, thrice wrong. I thought this myself but watching a Magner's League game recently I was calling for the team (possibly Irish prov) to take the quick throw, they did and the ref blew them up saying, exactly what the post you've commented on says. The throw can only be taken quickly from the spot where it goes out on the full, or in line with where the kick was. Maybe you've seen it happen, but as I would've agreed with you 2 months ago, I also hadit spelt out.
Anonymous March 15, 2011 4:05 pm

"1. When you take a quick throw from a out on the full kick its from where the ball crossed the line not from the kicker took the kick (where it was taken from)"
You can throw it in anywhere from the try line up to the point where the ball crossed the line on a quick throw.
March 15, 2011 3:27 AM
Wrong, wrong, thrice wrong. I thought this myself but watching a Magner's League game recently I was calling for the team (possibly Irish prov) to take the quick throw, they did and the ref blew them up saying, exactly what the post you've commented on says. The throw can only be taken quickly from the spot where it goes out on the full, or in line with where the kick was. Maybe you've seen it happen, but as I would've agreed with you 2 months ago, I also hadit spelt out.
Anonymous March 15, 2011 4:14 pm

...Our rugby would look just like yours if we didnt tackle...
Listen to the Jedi, thy opposition drinks for being F*%king weak in the scrum, drink up boys and stop moaning!
Anonymous March 15, 2011 4:14 pm

...Our rugby would look just like yours if we didnt tackle...
Listen to the Jedi, thy opposition drinks for being F*%king weak in the scrum, drink up boys and stop moaning!
Anonymous March 16, 2011 12:48 am

And if you genuinly believe that garbage, you know nothing about rugby.
Obviously if a team like the Crusaders is full of All Blacks, and they can tackle the shit out of the combined national teams of Europe at national team level, to the point they rarely even concede a single try on an entire november tour, they are going to be able to tackle at provincial level.
It's just that in S15 the play is faster and the players are better, so it's harder tod efend their attacking play.
It's why NH teams lose the vast majority of the time.
But I guess you ahve to lie to yourself to feel better.
Anonymous March 16, 2011 12:48 am

And if you genuinly believe that garbage, you know nothing about rugby.
Obviously if a team like the Crusaders is full of All Blacks, and they can tackle the shit out of the combined national teams of Europe at national team level, to the point they rarely even concede a single try on an entire november tour, they are going to be able to tackle at provincial level.
It's just that in S15 the play is faster and the players are better, so it's harder tod efend their attacking play.
It's why NH teams lose the vast majority of the time.
But I guess you ahve to lie to yourself to feel better.
Anonymous March 16, 2011 11:49 am

The question is what the hell does S15 or the crusaders have to do with this match but it doesnt stop you guys commenting all the time. The point is its boring.
The talk is always england arogant this, france flakey that, Wales want to be NZ.. dull.
The minute somebody challenges your BS you start through the toys out of the pram as you just did.
The SH isn't a better standard of rugby its just different, but as long as you keep posting stupid comments guys like me will pull you up for it
Anonymous March 16, 2011 11:49 am

The question is what the hell does S15 or the crusaders have to do with this match but it doesnt stop you guys commenting all the time. The point is its boring.
The talk is always england arogant this, france flakey that, Wales want to be NZ.. dull.
The minute somebody challenges your BS you start through the toys out of the pram as you just did.
The SH isn't a better standard of rugby its just different, but as long as you keep posting stupid comments guys like me will pull you up for it
Anonymous March 16, 2011 10:05 pm

Why is the winning percentage for SH teams against NH teams so much better.
Why do top level coaches and players acknowledge the skills gap publicly.
You nonce, you nothing about rugby.
Anonymous March 16, 2011 10:05 pm

Why is the winning percentage for SH teams against NH teams so much better.
Why do top level coaches and players acknowledge the skills gap publicly.
You nonce, you nothing about rugby.
BearGryllsFurCoat March 18, 2011 2:35 am

As for Ireland, I don't think they're as far away from where they want to be as a lot of people think. There's nothing between the top 4 6N teams and I think they'll beat the English on Saturday.
BearGryllsFurCoat March 18, 2011 2:35 am

As for Ireland, I don't think they're as far away from where they want to be as a lot of people think. There's nothing between the top 4 6N teams and I think they'll beat the English on Saturday.














Commenting as Guest | Register or Login