Monday, April 04, 2011
Joe Marler and Marcos Ayerza both banned for two weeks

Front rowers Joe Marler and Marcos Ayerza have both been banned for two weeks following an altercation that took place during the Harlequins and Leicester Tigers Aviva Premiership game on Saturday.
Both players were red carded by referee Wayne Barnes, who saw the incident unfold right in front of him, with Ayerza head butting Marler, who then retaliated with a few seemingly well placed punches.
The pair were sent from the field, and earlier today faced an RFU disciplinary hearing. The result of that is that they were both handed two week suspensions, making them free to play again on April 19.
It was a fiery clash with a few yellow cards and a serious lack of numbers on the park at one stage. Referee Barnes had sent Will Skinner and Mark Lambert from the field too, albeit temporarily, but that meant Quins were down to 12 at one stage.
Harlequins Director of rugby Conor O'Shea was furious with the officiating afterwards.
"There are a number of talking points. Does Joe feel hard-done by? I know I would be. Should he have reacted that way, probably not. Was the provocation high? Absolutely. But I do want to know why when Tom Williams was tackled off the ball going for the line, there was no penalty try, no yellow card when both should have been 100%," he said.
Leicester's Richard Cockerill saw things slightly differently, saying "That's rugby. So much happened out there and it was a fractious game at times. Marler was involved in everything. He has a Mohican hairdo dyed orange so he's difficult to miss.
"It's up to Quins to deal with him. We look to our own players."
Posted at 6:26 pm | 61 comments
Posted in Big Hits & Dirty Play
|
|
Viewing 61 comments
NateBear April 04, 2011 5:29 pm

Would be interesting to see the clip regarding the early tackle again.
BIGWHIT April 04, 2011 5:32 pm

fry April 04, 2011 5:34 pm

edbok April 04, 2011 5:39 pm

It was a very fiery game - it was a good game too! - and no surprise about the citings. But giving Marler the same length of ban as Ayerza is patently unfair. We all know that players should not retaliate, but when they do in response to a nasty cheap shot, you better have a very very good reason to hand out an equivalent ban.
A good comparison would be the Cudmore-O'Connell fight from last season's Heineken Cup. Cudmore started it, O'Connell retaliated; the former was punished, the latter not. O'Connell was probably lucky to get no punishment at all, but they got it right by heaping the heavier punishment on the guy who started the whole thing off.
Anonymous April 04, 2011 5:42 pm

SmellyNerfherder April 04, 2011 5:52 pm

HwA April 04, 2011 5:56 pm

Anonymous April 04, 2011 6:00 pm

Moneykillsrugby April 04, 2011 6:10 pm

Anonymous April 04, 2011 6:11 pm

No.7 April 04, 2011 6:17 pm

If anything he deserved more punishment....its another Nathan Hines on Byrne, Grewcock on (ferris?!?) retaliating due to being held back...or at least that didnt help..
I'd have said yellow to both, end of story...personally..
Marvel April 04, 2011 6:17 pm

Anton April 04, 2011 6:18 pm

DEO April 04, 2011 6:45 pm

Better than their scrummaging.
Juggernauter April 04, 2011 7:08 pm

On the citings and bans stuff, Ayerza 2 weeks and Marler 1 week would have been more suitable, in my opinion.
Anyway, lad, get a haircut, specially those hairs on the back of his head!
Anonymous April 04, 2011 7:08 pm

Good to see Marler playing well, two weeks is a bit extreme, the ref clearly wasn't going to stop what was going on so it was inevitable that he retaliated. First player i've seen sent off to a standing ovation and cheering!
Anonymous April 04, 2011 7:20 pm

Anonymous April 04, 2011 7:25 pm

CosmicGypsy April 04, 2011 7:36 pm

--------
If everyone had a haircut like Joe Marler you'd be saying the rare minority with short back and sides look like idiots. Afterall there's no objectivity with what haircut is good and what's bad. It's on par with argueing that people who wear the colour green look like idiots.
In actuality it's conformist pseudo-intellectuals like you that make not only Rugby fans look bad, but society as a whole.
Most comments here are nothing but playful banter and personal opinion, but your comment is out and out ignorant mate.
Yes he looks like an arse, but that's his choice. Society would be a pretty boring place if everyone was like you, or me, or anyone else for that matter.
As for the fight, Marler should have only seen Yellow. Certainly not any kind of ban for what was ultimately self defence. You let a guy headbut you once, fair enough, but twice you defend yourself. I think the fact he turned to the ref says alot about him and this incident. Put Mahatma Ghandi in that situation and he'd retaliate, it's basic science, the brain is hardwired that way.
Anonymous April 04, 2011 8:26 pm

Juggernauter April 04, 2011 8:28 pm

I see your point about the haircut, but thinking straight, Marler should have done something even more intelligent:
Let Ayerza headbutt him twice, then raise his arms and walk away. That way Ayerza would have been the only guilty party in all the mess and probably he would have been given a red and a lenghty ban, and Marler would've stayed on the pitch. Easier said than done, though, kinda difficult to stay cool in that situation.
Just an opinion.
Hoizokimaru April 04, 2011 8:52 pm

Plenty of people throw punches in matches and don't get sent off (see O'gara in the last 6nations match), and I think it was bad luck that Marler chose to throw his at that moment.
Anonymous April 04, 2011 9:04 pm

Anonymous April 04, 2011 10:03 pm

NateBear April 04, 2011 10:12 pm

You can't use self defence as an excuse to punch someone..... pretty simple!
RedYeti April 04, 2011 10:28 pm

No.7 April 05, 2011 12:18 am

(actually i better explain this one before i get mobbed for being an anti-man)
I typed in Joe Marler, then on a picture of him there was that word, so i typed in the whole phrase and some hilarious pics came up!
bergemasco April 05, 2011 3:07 am

bergemasco April 05, 2011 3:14 am

Jono April 05, 2011 6:23 am

Is this common in the Aviva Pemiership?
Von April 05, 2011 7:09 am

Can't be many sports where an off-the-ball upper-cut is met with a polite ripple of applause from the fans!
Anonymous April 05, 2011 7:31 am

..
I'm sure a Judge would disagree with you there.
Cmon84 April 05, 2011 7:36 am

Anonymous April 05, 2011 8:19 am

Marler should have got the red through principle of walking on to a rugby pitch sporting that cut. It's a pity that the only thing that gets you recognised is your hair, not your ability to play rugby.
Von April 05, 2011 8:43 am

Marler's is clearly a piss-take, an ironic send-up of himself, whereas I reckon Ranger probably actually thinks his looks good.
Here's a nice column by Will Greenwood on Marler from last autumn:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/rugbyunion/club/7994996/Will-Greenwood-Theres-a-great-deal-more-to-Joe-Marler-than-his-Mohican.html
Anonymous April 05, 2011 9:08 am

Barnes then said he saw the whole thing so why not blow his whistle whe he saw the headbutt?
Marler did the right thing by hesitating but if the ref does nothing he has to retaliate somehow.
Barnes has a few friends in the media who write good things about him thereby making people think he's good.
The scrum yellow cards and then a penalty try was a fiasco and any other ref would have been vilified in the media.
mat April 05, 2011 9:09 am

Nick April 05, 2011 9:12 am

Having seen quins play a few times this season Marler is often involved in this sort of thing and I think teams are realising he's easy to provoke. If he wants that England shirt he's going to have to wind his neck in occasionally or he's going to be a liability.
O'Shea should stop whinging. Leicester could have been pinged for a few but so could Quins. It wasn't a badly reffed match. If his team could convert opportunities theyhadthey should have won the match, it wasn't the refs fault
edbok April 05, 2011 9:26 am

But the officials got the decisions right there, handing out the more severe punishment to Cudmore.
All other things being equal, the guy who throws the first punch should cop the harsher penalty. That's why Joe Marler has been hard done by here. (All the niggly stuff that might have gone on before is totally irrelevant. He didn't deserve red for this incident, he certainly didn't deserve the same ban as Ayerza.)
Anonymous April 05, 2011 9:34 am

The haircut alone is a red nonetheless
Anonymous April 05, 2011 10:43 am

any body inlighten me on what headworks means googled it came back with waste water company
Gary April 05, 2011 10:59 am

Cian April 05, 2011 11:39 am

Also, O'Shea makes a very good point about Williams' chase when he was tackled off the ball by Ben Youngs. I couldn't believe none of the commentators mentioned it at the time.
BillM April 05, 2011 12:14 pm

Arff...no they are not french or playing in top 14??
Huuu, some people must be disapointed here!
Ian M April 05, 2011 1:43 pm

I'm not even going to start on the hair...
Anonymous April 05, 2011 4:02 pm

What should he have?
I mean we have Percy Montgomery with his football hair do. Big vic matfield with scraggy longish hair, cabal with long hair, stringer who is bald, ummm jerry Collins with his Guinness hairdo, umaga and nonu with dreds..... So what is the correct hairdo?
Rooster April 05, 2011 8:22 pm

Russell April 06, 2011 11:00 am

personally think two yellows would have sufficed, but you piss around like that then you can't complain when you get sent off...
Stubby April 06, 2011 12:39 pm

Marler started it.
Marler started it.
Hands in the face area prior to the head butt. Head butt was retaliation for whatever Marler was doing or had done with his hand/fingers. Marler trying to appeal to ref for the retaliation. Luckily for Ayerza his second headbutt irked Marler enough for him to also retaliate. Instead of Tigers being down one, he managed to get offsetting reds.
Anonymous April 06, 2011 6:16 pm

filth December 21, 2011 8:02 am
















Commenting as Guest | Register or Login