Tuesday, August 02, 2011
Seilala Mapusua talks about the pride of playing for Samoa

Samoa have always been a proud rugby nation who over time have produced some incredible players. As the World Cup approaches, former London Irish centre Seilala Mapusua talks about the pride felt when representing their country.
A few weeks back we watched on in awe of Samoa as they pulled off a brilliant upset win over the Wallabies , in Australia. While their performances at the Pacific Nations Cup shortly before that had been a bit puzzling, the Wallaby win showed how strong they can be when they get all their top players together, from all the different corners of the globe.
Unfortunately one of the downfalls of professional rugby these days is that to make a decent living out of the game, their top players ply their trade elsewhere, predominantly in the UK and France. That's both a good and a bad thing, for obvious reasons.
Overall though, the experience, skills, and confidence they build when playing in some of the top leagues in the world means that as a unit, when timing and resources are right, they are capable of overturning even the best sides. And if they don't beat you on the scorecard, you'll feel beaten the next day anyway, as the physical element the pacific islanders bring to the game is fearsome.
Just ask Rod Davies .
All the talk ahead of the World Cup now though is about Samoa's meetings with Wales, and of course defending champions South Africa, who themselves aren't shy to mix it up physically. In 2007 Bryan Habana scored four tries against Samoa , but there were without a doubt a few bruised Boks following the match. This year will be no different, as the pride of the people drives the players to give their all out on the pitch.
"We've always believed as a team that Manu Samoa belongs to the Samoan people, so we're always playing for our people every time we pull on that blue jersey," said Mapusua, referring to their tiny population of just 180 000.
Seilala is ready, and if you're not in the mood for the World Cup yet, you should be. We'll continue to bring you preview videos, interviews, and all sorts of little bits of footage and info over the next few weeks as we lead up to the highly anticipated tournament.
Do you think a Samoa have a genuine chance of upsetting Wales and/or South Africa?
Time: 2:39
Posted at 9:10 pm | 43 comments
Posted in Interviews
|
|
Viewing 43 comments
Anonymous August 02, 2011 10:01 pm

Anonymous August 03, 2011 1:17 am

Anonymous August 03, 2011 5:19 am

Anonymous August 03, 2011 8:27 am

Von August 03, 2011 9:10 am

Why do teams like Samoa still seem to be perceived as underdogs? I reckon either Samoa or Fiji will go through from the group with SA, at Wales's expense.
Anonymous August 03, 2011 10:50 am

Anonymous August 03, 2011 11:14 am

On a serious rugby note the best samoan 15 is more than capable of beating Wales and south africa. Tonga almost caused an upset in 2007 and if you recall the fiji performance against SA in the 1/4 they could have been leading with 10 minutes to go, if there 2nd row had the ball in the left hand when diving for the line.
I think Wales are better prepared this time round though. They actually have a few inside centres and a coach who isn't employing a loose game-plan against these islanders. This group really is exciting. 4 out of the 5 teams have a good chance of qualifying!
Anonymous August 03, 2011 12:46 pm

Anonymous August 03, 2011 12:49 pm

ConnachtFan August 03, 2011 1:33 pm

Luxi August 03, 2011 1:46 pm

they could also be a real threat to SA, that game will definitely be full of bone crushing hits ;P
JOHN August 03, 2011 1:50 pm

E.g. Vasily Artymyev - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R5KTf2W1N8g&feature=relmfu
Particularly enjoyed that one, but it's nice to hear what it means to some of the players, particularly some less well known players.
View Video
JOHN August 03, 2011 2:00 pm

I know this may well never happen, but it may, but I'd love to see the Island teams all crack the top 10 in rankings. These teams may not be the best, but they have my favourite mentality and style of play of any national teams. I'm not sure how that would be achieved (perhaps a professional league between the 3,incorporatingthem into the 4N, I'm not sure).
I would love to see a third source of real competition in world rugby (the other two being 4N and 6N countries). The talent is quite clearly there. They can beat AUS with no core of players who play with each other on a regular basis so who knows what they could do with the structure of the top 6 countries.
Anonymous August 03, 2011 2:24 pm

Von August 03, 2011 3:54 pm

The IRB's video producer wants to turn down the volume of that rousing orchestral music on these though - there were moments where you can hardly hear what Artemyev or Mapusua were saying!
Sander August 03, 2011 4:46 pm

South Africa will go through, I think. Probably won't take any risk and field the strongest side for both Wales and Samoa, which should be enough.
Here's to Samoa of 2011 being the Argentina of 2007!
JD August 03, 2011 5:05 pm

Anonymous August 03, 2011 5:52 pm

Anonymous August 03, 2011 6:06 pm

Gabe August 03, 2011 7:43 pm

JD August 03, 2011 7:50 pm

Absolutely nothing.
I just get annoyed sometimes with the claims that NZ poaches all the island talent without any understanding of NZ's demographics.
Apologies, back to the advertised programme..
Toby August 03, 2011 8:24 pm

Wales are first up for them and I honestly believe that Wales have the potential to put one over on them in that game. Samoa will fear nobody and Fiji may well have a say in the group overall standings come the end.
We'll know more in the next few weeks after the NH warm-ups and the Tri Nations but the Springboks should be very, very worried.
Canadian content August 03, 2011 9:49 pm

Mapusua is the best 12 in the world, his battle with Roberts will be awesome, as with devilliers as well.
If they play the rugby they can and either wales or sa don't perform, they could easily win both games.
Anonymous August 03, 2011 10:42 pm

I just get annoyed sometimes with the claims that NZ poaches all the island talent without any understanding of NZ's demographics.
Apologies, back to the advertised programme.."
Mapusua was one Samoan they didn't poach.
Anonymous August 03, 2011 11:17 pm

Anonymous August 04, 2011 12:59 am

His entire family is Samoan. well the generation above him
meh August 04, 2011 3:41 am

And?
If he would have grown up feeling more Kiwi than anything, that's his decision.
Like Manu Tuilagi possibly playing for England. That's where he feels he is "home".
Don't get me wrong. I'm extremely glad he's playing for Samoa. I just don't think lineage is as much of a deciding factor as your simple statement made it seem.
meh August 04, 2011 3:42 am

Ijif August 04, 2011 4:54 am

That's a load of rubbish. Last time Wales played Fiji they couldn't move them and Alan Jones repeatedly brought down the scrum.
Of course the eurocentric idea that Islanders can't scrum is still prevalent and the ref called every scrum in Wales favour, even so far as to award Wales a penalty try for bringing down their own scrum 8 times in a row.
Lets just hope pre-games the teams make the ref aware of the Welsh cheating at the scrummage.
Anonymous August 04, 2011 4:56 am

So Sackey, Monye, Ojo and the Armitage brothers - None of them are English?
N August 04, 2011 6:01 am

The point isn't that they shouldn't play for Samoa, as they obviously feel a strong connection to the country their families come from, just that the idea that NZ tries to poach these guys is ridiculous.
Most of these guys weren't really offered positions in the Nz national team, so usually it's a moot point, but they have a choice.
In fact, for many of them, Samoa is their second choice and if they had been given a chance in the All Blacks they may well have taken it.
Which would also be their right, since they are in fact born and bred in NZ, learned all their rugby there, usually either live there currently or retire there and consider NZ home.
In relation tot heir family being from Samoa, yes that's true and it's why they play for Samoa, but it doesn't mean they automatically will. It's like Thomas Waldrom, only one of his grandparents was born in england, all the rest of his recent ancestors are born and bred in NZ, so of course it'd be pretty crazy for him to play for England... oh wait...
Anonymous August 04, 2011 6:03 am

Anonymous August 04, 2011 6:05 am

Ask them. I don't know what they consider themselves.
My point was that Mapusua has every right to play for Samoa.
Anonymous August 04, 2011 6:05 am

Starting players in two of the most scrummage focussed leagues in the world.
Why the hell would Wales automatically be better scrummagers?
Cencus Johnston is one of the best scrummagers in Europe. And you assume Wales are better?
As someone pointed out, against Fiji Wales got away with murder. Constantly binding illegally, slipping the bind, and collapsing the scrum. The ref rewarded them which was ridiculous and no doubt had a lot to do with the kind of bias seen here which just assumes islanders can't scrum for some reason.
Anonymous August 04, 2011 6:08 am

Well considering 99% of those Islanders (which isn't a nationality but a term that encompases a type of people, like the term Celts) are born and bred NZ citizens, it's pretty fucking ridiculous to say that NZ poaches them.
That's like saying that England is poaching Monye, because his ancestors are from Africa. It's ridiculous, based on total ignorance of the demographic of NZ, and borderline racist.
Anonymous August 04, 2011 6:14 am

IT'S UP TO THE PLAYERS WHO THEY PLAY FOR.
NO ONE PUTS A GUN TO THEIR HEAD.
And it's tantamount to saying that only white people and Maoris should play for NZ, despite like 15% of the population of the country being of Island extraction.
It's like saying black people are being poached to play for England, because their parents or grandparents, bloody great-great grandparents were from Africa.
Anonymous August 04, 2011 6:58 am

I wouldn't agree with that but Islanders are completely underrated as scrummagers. The only reason I can think of is because of their reputation of loose style of play and hard hits overwhelms any other qualities they have.
Johnston can run fucking fast for a behemoth. He must be one of the biggest players in Europe and one of the fastest props. Great open play forward. He is a bit weak defensively though. I'm a Leinster fan and in the Leinster / Toulouse game this year, Johnston tried to trips with his legs when he was caught out... he's still in my top 5 props in the world though.
Anonymous August 04, 2011 4:04 pm

None of the black people that play for England this day and age are any good.....
Not sure why people assume all these "NZ poach players" comments are coming from England fans....
Sander August 04, 2011 5:43 pm

Rugby is both a global and commercially viable game these days. Some players will choose to play where their heart tells them go, some players will make those decision based on potential money.
Sure, sometimes players might be pressured to choose one side or another, but the idea of poaching amongst the Polynesians is really getting old.
I didn't hear anybody complaining when Tony Marsh played for France, when Sonny Parker played for Wales or Mike Catt for England, Metcalfe for Scotland etc etc etc. Didn't hear anybody complain either when Strauss came out saying he might well play for Ireland soon.
Players will most likely make their own decisions, making the argument of poaching a bit of sour grapes. Welcome to the modern day of professional sports.
For a bit of reference; the dutch soccer team always had a lot of succesful surinam players, who never lived in Surinam. Would dutch soccer be poaching then?
Anonymous August 04, 2011 6:36 pm

Also, pro teams in the islands are not feasible. No money there. And no need to grow the game either, it's already massive.
Japan, Russia etc. are the places to do it. No real commitment to a particular sport, a growing interest in rugby, and a fuck load of wealthy people to invest in it.















Commenting as Guest | Register or Login