Monday, September 12, 2011
Rugby World Cup Daily - Injuries, citings, and fans

The first week of Rugby World Cup 2011 has passed, and it's time for a short break, so we now have a few days to catch our breaths, catch up on sleep, and reflect on what's taken place in the opening round.
In this latest edition of Rugby World Cup Daily there's a look at some of the fans that are touring around New Zealand, some interviews with the Romanians who played so well against Scotland, and a look at some of the injuries that may have an affect on the rest of the tournament.
Wallabies winger Digby Ioane, who scored in their match against Italy, will be undergoing surgery on the fractured thumb that occured during the match. That could disrupt their backline somewhat as Ioane usually defends at 10 Quade Cooper slips back to fullback. What it may mean though is a miraculous return to the team for Drew Mitchell, who had a bad ankle break in April.
South Africa escaped defeat against Wales, but had two key injuries early on, as Victor Matfield and Jean De Villiers both left the field. De Viliers has a rib injury and Matfield a hamstring. They will probably miss the clash with Fiji, while Bakkies Botha may well be heading home as he's not responding well to treatment.
In the England camp, their win over Argentina has come at a price as lock Courtney Lawes has been cited for striking hooker Mario Ledesma. The incident occured shortly after a huge, possibly borderline, tackle he put in on center Gonzalo Tiesi, which resulted in Tiesi leaving the field.
The alleged strike on Ledesma was with the knee, on the sideline as he raced across to make the tackle. It looked bad on first sight, but it was hard to see if he actually made contact. We'll find out soon if he remains in the tournament or not.
Posted at 2:00 pm | 16 comments
Posted in Rugby World Cup 2011
|
|
Viewing 16 comments
brookmcg September 12, 2011 4:41 pm
Xenophile September 12, 2011 5:01 pm
softly softly September 12, 2011 5:15 pm

scrum fan September 12, 2011 5:26 pm

Hugh MadBrough September 12, 2011 5:37 pm

Colombes September 12, 2011 5:53 pm
how can u dare to say that Ledesema milked it or that the tackle on tiesi was legal?
I would like to watch your reaction taking the knee or any part of Lawes on your face ;)
Rugby is a hard game but with rules in order to avoid serious injuries. Ask to Tiesi
I don't think Lawes was malicious on both cases. He has a physical and brutal defence but sometimes quite dangerous.
On Tiesi tackle, the technique is perfect and lethal, but he was shortly late. unfortunately, it happens often
On Ledesma, it's completly unnecessary. I think a short 2-3 weeks ban would be enough to learn him to limit the late tackles and to fall on his opponents face with his knees
Frenchie September 12, 2011 7:24 pm
Lawes hopefully will get a ban.
BuzzKillington September 12, 2011 9:52 pm
The Ledesma incident was a bit more nasty, but I think Lawes is victim to himself there. He's a big oaf of a man and clumsily collects Ledesma with his knees, I don't think it was intentional, but he might have a case to answer for recklessness.
If I can be blatantly honest for just a moment though, I don't think either of those incidents on their lonesome would merit much of a discussion. But because he was involved in 2 borderline insults he'll probably see a week or two. Rightly or wrongly.
Frenchie September 13, 2011 2:12 am
Dave September 13, 2011 8:45 am

So well done on citing him, but a terrible decision. A two match ban for that? Rules him out of the games against Romania and Georgia. So basically, he might as well not have been banned at all, they're gimme-games to the England side, no disrepect to Georgia or Romania. Should've been at least a 3 match ban, possibly more.
Tim September 13, 2011 9:23 am

ropeycentre September 13, 2011 11:27 am

He gets it reduced for remorse for saying I did not deliberately knee Ledesma and I don't think I was reckless just trying hard to get across and make sure he did not score but I am very sorry for KO'ing the guy.
stroudos September 13, 2011 12:19 pm
I agree with ropeycentre and in fact two weeks was exactly what I predicted. Personally I think this was a bit of a cheap shot, but his thought process would have been "I don't really care if I clatter him while stopping the try", as opposed to "right, I'm going to clatter this bar steward". Also, he has a distinct lack of previous for foul play. He's usually a clean, but abrasive and physical, player and that good record has obviously been taken into account.
There's a rumour England may even appeal the two-week sentence, but I sincerely hope they don't. I think it's a fair verdict and Lawes & England should take the medicine.
Hugh MadBrough September 13, 2011 1:33 pm

blunder September 13, 2011 12:42 pm















Commenting as Guest | Register or Login