Tuesday, October 11, 2011
Chris Hala'ufia banned for seven weeks for dangerous tackle on Olly Morgan

London Irish number eight Chris Hala'Ufia has been suspended from rugby for seven weeks following a dangerous tackle on Olly Morgan during the Aviva Premiership match between the Exiles and Gloucester at Kingsholm.
Hala'Ufia was yellow carded and later cited for the high tackle on Morgan during the 33-30 defeat on October 1st. He admitted to the RFU charge of making a dangerous tackle.
"Hala'ufia was duly suspended by the RFU disciplinary panel for seven weeks and will be able to play again on November 29 2011," a Rugby Football Union statement read.
The 32 year old Tongan is no stranger to falling foul of the law, having faced numerous suspensions in recent times. He was banned for four weeks for striking Leinster's Leo Cullen in January last year, then shortly afterwards picked up another suspension for a dangerous tackle against Wasps.
Earlier this year he got an eight week suspension for a dangerous charge no Northampton Saints' Shane Geraghty. All of these incidents will no doubt have played a part in this current suspension.
If you were referee on the day and saw the incident clearly, would you have red carded him?
Posted at 1:42 pm | 43 comments
Posted in Big Hits & Dirty Play
|
|
Viewing 43 comments
Filli October 11, 2011 4:14 pm

Patrick October 11, 2011 4:23 pm

ceri October 11, 2011 4:36 pm

i love bacon October 11, 2011 5:45 pm
Congratulations, ceri, for the dumbest comment so far this year. To everyone else: the year isn't over yet, so you still have a chance!
UHtiger October 11, 2011 10:41 pm

ItalianRef October 11, 2011 6:22 pm

the only stats I have is 3 per year in England, 2 in France and 1 every 3 years in Italy.
please, go tell them that we should thoughen up and not be a pussy. then you come play on my field and I will allow some "non-pussy-rugby" just on you.
there is no excuse for foul play. rugby is a contact game, not a combat game.
and you my dear are an idiot
BuzzKillington October 12, 2011 7:05 pm
Eggman October 11, 2011 8:00 pm

Callum May 11, 2012 2:41 pm

RuggerRugby October 11, 2011 4:48 pm

Andre October 11, 2011 4:49 pm

Vigilante_Man October 11, 2011 4:53 pm
Captain October 11, 2011 5:13 pm

Guy October 11, 2011 6:09 pm

...with the ban, that is.
Ceri obviously never played rugby himself. Or he was just kidding.
Definitely not doing the Tongans proud.
IrishRef October 11, 2011 6:18 pm

Juggernauter October 11, 2011 6:59 pm
I think refs must stop being afraid to show the reds when required... although never be as traumed as Nigel Owens!
Cheers
Steve October 11, 2011 7:11 pm

Xenophile October 11, 2011 7:14 pm
fastmongrel October 11, 2011 7:59 pm

Hendogo October 11, 2011 8:40 pm
D0m3 October 11, 2011 8:50 pm

flyingpepper October 12, 2011 12:07 pm

Blob October 11, 2011 9:00 pm

Amazing how even this post has seen an opportunity for a bit of England bashing. Good effort.
Juggalo October 11, 2011 11:28 pm

Frenchie October 12, 2011 12:34 am
frank e October 12, 2011 7:31 am

8wks before and only 7wks now? so they determined he showing signs of improvement? rfu get it together.
Tree October 12, 2011 11:06 am

Colombes October 12, 2011 12:53 pm
7 weeks is correct in the IRB ban classification, but not enough, considering the "palmares" of of the player. he is a recidivist and he has been often involved in cheap shots in mauls
Obie October 12, 2011 1:13 pm

You see he only makes the move AFTER the guy is kicking.
I would give him this punishment and a probation of a year.
Next offense you're out of rugby for a year since you don't want to learn....
BuzzKillington October 12, 2011 7:28 pm
It's easy to say "if it's a few inches lower"(although in the case the issue isn't the height of the table but the positioning) in hindsight I know, but I think the outcome is far worse than the intention. He intended to hit him late and hard - I have no doubt about that - but I'm not sold he intended to hit him high or actually use his head maliciously. More than anything I think if you look at the replay 0:45 seconds into the video, to me, his tucking of the head looks like an attempt at self protection, after coming in on an incorrect angle. I also don't believe, on that angle, that the tackle was high. Which sounds ridiculous because obviously Morgan was hit directly in the chin, but the shoulder contact seems to be low enough. It looks more like stupidity, he put his head in the wrong place and paid the price. Nothing particularly indicative of malicious intent though. People put their head on the wrong side in the tackle all the time.
The main problem with Rugby is not the rules but the faux outrage every time something goes wrong. People seem to judge and condemn incidents and players on emotion and outrage. A bit of a soccer mentality that's creeping into the game.
This was a bad tackle and he endangered Morgan with his recklessness. That's all I think it is. I wouldn't say Rugby has turned soft for punishing Hala'ufia, but I'd argue the length and severity of the punishment is soft, and the over reaction by rugby fans is soft.
From reading some of these comments you'd think Hala'ufia shot up a nursery! I wonder if Wilkinson made this tackle what the consensus would be.
Michael October 12, 2011 10:38 pm

Rich October 13, 2011 12:46 pm

Tree October 13, 2011 6:33 pm

Aj October 15, 2011 2:16 pm
















Commenting as Guest | Register or Login