Saturday, December 17, 2011
Francesco Minto red carded for head-butt on Yann Lesgourgues

Biarritz eased to a comfortable 29-12 win over a fourteen man Beneton Treviso side that suffered following the sending off of flanker Francesco Minto for a headbutt. Treviso had led 12-0 at one stage before Biarritz turned things around.
Biarritz looked to avenge their last weekend's loss to Treviso in Italy, but this time the side that played so well previously did themselves no favours as taking on Biarritz at home with just fourteen men for most of the game was always going to be a challenge.
After 24 minutes flanker Francesco Minto decided to attempt a clearout on scrumhalf Yann Lesgourgues with his head. You can only wonder what he was thinking as he leaned in and floored the smaller man, who took a long time to recover from the impact.
A red card was swiftly shown by referee Peter Fitzgibbon, and Minto took the walk of shame after a moment of madness that would have had a large bearing on the outcome of the game.
While Treviso made life tough for the home side as they played with a player short, hooker Arnaud Heguy scored with time up to give Biarritz a much needed four try bonus point, keeping them in the mix for a spot in the quarter finals.
If you're watching Heineken Cup rugby this weekend please keep an eye out for incidents that you'd like featured on here, and give us a shout with details. Enjoy.
Posted at 10:12 am | 42 comments
Related Posts
Posted in Big Hits & Dirty Play
|
|
Viewing 42 comments
Cookie December 17, 2011 1:09 pm
(the name in the title in incorrect, it's Francesco Minto, not Francisco Mento)
johndoe December 17, 2011 2:05 pm

Colombes December 17, 2011 7:13 pm
JamesH December 22, 2011 2:49 pm

Guy December 17, 2011 2:08 pm

Really I don't see it. He hits the scrumhalf's shoulder with his head but is this considered a headbutt nowadays? To be clear: I am not the kind of old-skool-hardliner that thinks it's okay to destroy your opponent with every means possible. But here I just see: head to shoulder. What's the red card offense?
poccio December 17, 2011 2:30 pm
Full Back December 17, 2011 4:03 pm

Rather than tilt his head he could have stayed lower, or let go of the player on the ground and cleared the #9 with a legal movement.
Rather than benefit the doubt in these cases I think it's right to be harsh, they're professionals and so push the limits when they can, headbutts have to be kept out.
Would he have done the same thing without headgear?
ItalianRef December 18, 2011 6:26 pm

yes, if a guy is stupid enough to do such a smart move in front of the ref he probably would do it without any protection.
I agree with the red card, if not strictly necessary, it punished Minto's stupidity.
anyway it was a pitty because Treviso would have played another match in 15..
Finally, I am seeing more and more ruggers "milk" these kind of situations a very ugly turn our game is taking, in a very soccer-player way.
This comment has been removed
This comment has been removed
This comment has been removed
This comment has been removed
This comment has been removed
This comment has been removed
This comment has been removed
This comment has been removed
This comment has been removed
kevtoulousaing December 17, 2011 4:51 pm

UHtiger December 17, 2011 6:38 pm

Colombes December 17, 2011 7:17 pm
UHtiger December 18, 2011 7:11 am

Pretzel December 18, 2011 9:29 pm
As for the "warriors" comment, have you ever seen an old game of rugby??? Couldn't be further from warriors if they tried....
Colombes December 17, 2011 7:20 pm
Pretzel December 18, 2011 12:05 am
Fettsack December 18, 2011 1:33 am
Filth December 18, 2011 8:05 am

Nothing in that. Not a red card. Referee is pathetic. Yet another example of how the Irb is turning rugby into ballet!
sp1nlo0p December 18, 2011 11:17 am

simiwol December 18, 2011 2:32 pm

Jimothy December 18, 2011 6:30 pm

niccolo December 18, 2011 6:59 pm

excuse me if the english isn't so good.
greets from italy
moddeur December 19, 2011 2:05 am
moddeur December 19, 2011 2:08 am
Filth December 19, 2011 3:33 am

Jimothy you make some credible points. But what you have to take into consideration is the fact that there was no malice in that so called head-butt. He was just trying to clear the half-back out, simple as that. On the other hand what must be taken into consideration is the massive incompetence of Peter Fitzgibbon; because of his decision the player will miss about 4 weeks due to that. I can understand player safety etc. I honestly reckon the toughness of rugby is disappearing with these overzealous refs.
Pretzel December 19, 2011 4:33 am
He knew EXACTLY what he was doing, he was just unlucky enough to get caught....
Jimothy December 20, 2011 8:16 pm

Eoghan December 19, 2011 9:56 am

"simiwol December 18, 2011 2:32 pm :
good clear out, scrum-half wasn't quick enough to get it away! Can't see how using head is any more damaging than a shoulder, especially as it was to the scrum-half's chest!! Yellow card maybe, never a red- no malice involved!"
Are you having a laugh ?? The first contact is to the s/half's face...and you'll find using your head to loaf someone is indeed more damaging than say a shoulder - although lets be fair, if you go around the place shoulder charging people in the head when you're both upright, you'll be (rightly) liable to sanction as well.
Greg December 22, 2011 11:23 am

So the endless debate of playing dirty is playing real rugby, please keep it in your dead end premiership.





















Commenting as Guest | Register or Login