Sunday, March 04, 2012
France vs Ireland ends in disappointing stalemate in Paris

A second half comeback from the hosts resulted in a 17-17 draw between France and Ireland in their rearranged Six Nations fixture on Sunday afternoon. The outcome rules out France's chances of a Grand Slam, while Ireland's title aspirations are now over.
Brilliant Irish winger Tommy Bowe scored twice for the visitors as they raced off to a first half lead, his first try coming from an intercept after a loose pass by center Aurelien Rougerie.
He scored again later on from a fantastic chip and chase effort, but the second half boot of Morgan Parra, and the pace of emerging talent Wesley Fofana both ruled out an Ireland victory.
"It’s disappointing for us, we played good rugby in the first half, we didn't match it in the second. It’s disappointing, we had a great opportunity to win and we didn’t take it. It’s frustrating for us, you don’t get many chances to win here," captain Paul O'Connell told BBC1.
Thierry Dusautoir said his team are very disappointed, echoed by coach Phillipe Saint-Andre. "In the dressing room it felt like a defeat. The Irish defend very well and contest the breakdown well. You have to congratulate the Irish, but you can't give points away easily like we did."
France play England at home next, then host Wales in the final game, with the Welsh side aiming for a Grand Slam, depending on what happens in their next fixture against Italy.
Ireland, having just one win under their belt from three Six Nations outings this year, host Scotland next weekend, then travel to Twickenham to face England.
Below are quick highlights from the game, featuring the tries and a late drop goal attempt.
Posted at 6:25 pm | 59 comments
Related Posts
|
|
Viewing 59 comments
Pretzel March 04, 2012 8:57 pm
I'm not sure I'd say Ireland were better than France but they definitely got the upper hand early on through the tries and to hand the game back via penalties is outrageous.
Fofana (spelling?) did well to get his 3rd try on his 3rd cap. I would like to see how much more useful he becomes in the future.
Anyone catch the man of the match? I didn't see any after match chatting. I can't say anyone really stood out. Bowe with his tries, Kearney with his catching skills, on the French side, Harinordoquay (again spelling?) seemed to play quite well, and then Fofana got the try. :/
themull March 04, 2012 9:16 pm

Ireland have only themselves to blame for not putting this match away with all the pressure they had early in the second half...Very poor line out play cost them dearly numerous times and towards the end idiotic play on the sideline gave the French posession whereas if the Irish runners had have turned infield we woulda have kept the ball and been on the front foot..
France kept the ball extremely well and really should have gotten the drop goal from the two chances they were given...Superb Irish defence was made seem all that better because of those two poor attempts...
Pretzel March 04, 2012 10:06 pm
I wonder if France would have won if Trinh-Duc had been on, well, would have got one of those drop goals?
brecor March 06, 2012 12:38 am

Pearson had a terrible day. Not giving Healy or D'arcy a yellow and then giving France two penalties when they should've went Ireland's way. In fairness he doesn't have the luxury of TV replays but he has consistently performed too poorly to be an international ref.
mise March 04, 2012 9:22 pm

The game made a good case for extra time in 6N, as neither wanted a draw, and sometimes, in tournaments, draws are useful. (it could also do with bonus points, the 6N)
Owen March 05, 2012 12:01 am

Pretzel March 05, 2012 8:32 pm
I think the bonus points would cause problems as Owen has pointed out.
I am not too bothered by draws personally... I think it adds another dimension, but really I have never thought too much into it...
Would be interesting to see 2 teams have the exact same number of points and point differences, I wonder what would happen then. (I may have heard something a while back talking about penalties or number of cards being a determining factor. No idea if that is true..)
brecor March 06, 2012 12:43 am

Pretzel March 06, 2012 1:28 am
brecor March 06, 2012 1:33 am

TJ-Hooker March 04, 2012 9:33 pm

Line-out was poor, considering how good rory best , have been playing for the past 18 months .disappointing we (Ireland) didn't put points on the board, in the 2nd half. The french were coming good , right up to the final whistle.
A draw was about right for both teams , but both teams , will feel that , victory was there for the taking. All that is left to play is pride , for the rest of the 6 nations.
Time to give new blood a change against scotland, and rest up , for the england game on paddy weekend .
Fettsack March 04, 2012 9:56 pm
Their comeback is a minimum to nearly save a very disappointing performance.
Ireland was the better team on the pitch today because they put more effort into it.
mcquickscopez March 05, 2012 12:13 am

Pretzel March 05, 2012 12:33 am
So if you're an Ireland supporter don't give up just yet, there may be a slight chance, although as I said before don't quote me on that as I haven't checked the tables... :)
Reality March 05, 2012 2:34 am

Sankeor March 05, 2012 12:43 am

1st half
- France made absolut beginner errors, especially with the stupid loose passes, and time to time with a lack of support on rucks. Plus individual defensive mistakes. Moreover I still don't understand the choice to take the penalty instead of taking the scrum in front of the irish scoreline, which would have lead most probably to a try or a penalty try. I couldn't stand what I saw. But still, they had the possession, excellent scrums and lineouts, and they were winning most of contests.
- Ireland had less opportunities but benefitted from the french side mistakes and then lack of commitment on rucks in the end of the half. In my opinion the aerial style of play they intended to set up failed, as french players caught perfectly the vast majority of the up and unders. They still had a big advantage on rucks with a very well organized defense and a special ability to disturb the exit of the ball in the rucks and avoid being penalized. Of course Tommy Bow is excellent but I mean to make an overall analysis.
2nd half
-France increased their possession of the ball, corrected defensive mistakes and stopped making stupid loose passes. As rain started to fall they developped a ground game with their forwards, and it worked pretty well (and imo they should have done that from the beginning).
-Ireland had nearly no balls to use, and accentuated their "their special ability" to disturb the exit of the ball in rucks. Honestly that was a foul play, even more than England few years ago... special mention to Cian Healy. As France came back to the score they had to improve their discipline and Healy logically left the field during a phase of pressure, before something horrible happen for Ireland. A mere miracle he was not yellow carded once or twice during the whole game, imo. Very clever to let both Sexton and O'Gara play in the end, but of course without the ball it's hard to kick it.
Reality March 05, 2012 2:31 am

First of all, that 'penalty try' that France definitely would have gotten if they had taken a scrum. Did you not notice that the Irish scrum was as good as, if not better than the French one? How many penalties did France get from scrums in the match? 1?Secondly, Ireland tried to play an aerial game and failed because the French catchers were too good? Rob Kearney gave the French players a lesson in how to catch, and anyway did you not notice that Trinh Duc kicked about twenty up and unders during the match? And what contests were France winning? Their lineouts were more successful, but they were obviously losing the breakdown battle, were unable to get quick ball, and were losing on points.
France were obviously better in the second half, but to say Ireland were only in it because they were cheating is just outrageous. Dave Pearson was acting like Craig Joubert in the WC final, that is, unwilling to penalise the home team. France were doing anything they wanted and getting away with it. Their mauls were so illegal. They just got people to obstruct the ball-carrier before he was tackled which is illegal. In the rucks as well they kept falling onto the Irish side and not moving, but Pearson did nothing about it. I'm not saying Ireland were angels, and Healy definitely should have been yellow carded, but to say Ireland were cheats and France weren't is just completely false.
In summary, Ireland were far better in the first half, in the second half France were the better team, and the referee was quite 'generous' let's say to both teams.
Sankeor March 05, 2012 4:14 pm

Rob Kearney did "robbed" a nice up&under kicked from his side, but I don't remember him catching other interesting high balls, so I wouldn't say that was a lesson. Harinordoquy did as well for the french side, and he's not a fullback.
In the second half particularly, it's well known that the defending team always has a higher tendency to make faults and give away penalties. Note that in mauls it's allowed to walk in front or next to the ball carrier, as long as you're fully bound to him wth an arm. Actually the gold rule in mauls is to pass the ball to the guy behind, so there's always somebody in front of the ball carrier so that the ball couldn't be ripped off. It's not illegal. Same thing for charges, still possible. Didn't notice anything wrong on rucks from the french side. Though I noticed frequently that the ball mysteriously leaped away from the ruck when Ireland was defending. For me that means everything, and it's objective.
Reality March 05, 2012 5:03 pm

Keith March 05, 2012 3:15 am

Ruggernut March 05, 2012 3:41 am
franz March 05, 2012 9:46 am

no offense but pearson was extremely clement with irish "skills" in the rucks.
Yorffeo March 05, 2012 11:02 am

Not to mention the definite yellow the offside irish player should have received for killing and attacking position.
I was honnestly quite lost with his refereeing...
(ending the 1st half 40 seconds before the 40 minutes mark waz verry odd to me...)
I think second half was better from the referee.
stroudos March 05, 2012 11:54 am
Ruggernut March 05, 2012 2:55 pm
Ruggernut March 05, 2012 2:01 pm
brecor March 06, 2012 1:01 am

Not only this but he was hugely inconsistent with the offside rule. Every ruck he'd shout at the Irish defensive line about being behind the last foot in the 2nd half- think he penalised us on 3 occasions for this. Problem is he completely ignored the French offsides.
Keith March 05, 2012 3:27 am

The former Munster coach has not raised the issue with any officials, but hinted that Pearson's superiors should take a close look at his performance.
He said: "We'll control what is within our control and hope to God that somebody who is in control on the other side will take a good look at that."
brecor March 06, 2012 1:07 am

Ruggernut March 05, 2012 3:28 am
France were useless for most of the first half but showed glimpses of what we know they can do. they then took control of the second half and did well to pull back and get the draw. I feel they should be annoyed for missing out on a win but then again, Ireland can feel the same as they should have closed out the game.
My overall point is that Ireland looked a lot better in the first half due to the horrific errors of the French rather than their own brilliance. (Mostly. There were very good moments from Ireland especially Kearney and Bowe.) But when France switched on, they looked a lot more dangerous even when Ireland didn't look bad.
Ruggernut March 05, 2012 3:34 am
breakaway March 05, 2012 3:54 am

stroudos March 05, 2012 12:17 pm
Toulousain March 05, 2012 9:35 am

Tullowtank March 05, 2012 10:56 am

I do have to say i did not think Pearson did Ireland many favours, numerous blatant penalities were clear to see and he never game them to Ireland, I felt he had a similarly poor performance last year in the Aviva when we played the French.
Ferris deserves a special mention for another stand out game, Heaslip continues to show he's the best Irish back-row player on the deck, why nobody has ever thought to swtich him to 7 and put O'Brien at 8 I do not understand! Sexton's defensive work was incredible, he really showed why we cannot play O'Gara at 10, his poor physical attributes would be shown up now more than ever.
Well done France though for battling back into it, showed real guts, determination and leadership. I think BOD's leadership is what Ireland have missed the most this campaign, he is of course past his best but can still come up with moments of magic but I feel if Ireland had him on the pitch for the last 10 minutes against Wales and the French we would be sitting pretty with 3 wins from 3.
Huh!! the 3rd March 05, 2012 1:35 pm

I've been saying it for at least 1 year by now. Heaslip doesn't have that explosiveness off the back of the scrum that we need. O'Brien has been figured out at 7, but at 8 he'd have more time to accelerate, while Heaslip is the closest of the 3 to an actual 7,. I can't believe it hasn't been tried yet. Even O'Sullivan swapped Wallace and Heaslip around for attacking scrums a few times in the 08 6N.
I also think Ferris needs a break vs Scotland. He's done well to last 3 high intensity games with his terrible knees. I'd rather have him for England away than at home to Scotland. Bring O'Mahony into 7, and move O'Brien across to 6 (prefer 8, but it probably won't happen).
Ruggernut March 05, 2012 5:00 pm
Colombes March 05, 2012 10:59 am
ferocious defences, very weird actions, some beginners mistakes, clumsy players because of the wet weather conditions? whatever, both teams had their 40 minutes.
Ireland was not far to snatch it. i had say that they should play like england to wish a victory. it was not so far from the reality :) they defended very well in the 1st half and didn't allow France to develop their game and they were absolurely lethal on their 2 semi-occasions: interception and a smart kick&chase counter-attack. but penalties really costed them. ferris and o'brien are always at the very-limit of the foul in every rucks, and u could see that POC wasn't happy of this indiscipline. they could also be relieved to escape 2 sin-bins for healy and darcy for 2 blatant technical fouls.
France was completly shit in the 1st half: very previsible, no intention, the forwards weren't present in the rucks and they let irishs score them 2 easy tries: Rougerie didn't look where he passed and Poitrenaud anticipated the tackle on Bowe on the 2nd try... in the 2nd half, they concentrated themselves on what could work when u are in a "bad day": the scrum, pick&go and drop goal. and it nearly worked. fofana spirit can show the way for the next games.
i don't blame this french team for not playing a dream rugby, as it's a new coach and the conditions didn't allow open game, but i'm sure st-andré wasn't pleased by what he saw. i bet he will manage these 2 last weeks as he had lost this game. the answer will may appear vs england and wales
Oliver March 05, 2012 11:25 am

- overall the result seems pretty fair to me. both teams showed good and bad stuff.
- bit of Irish luck though, IMO, taking the lead early on with that intercept.
- very impressed by Irish defence and combat spirit, as well as Bowes's 2nd try
- irish complaints about the refereeing are pretty ridiculous considering what they got away with (Cian Healy COME ON!).
- as French backs could not get past that defense, maybe some short-distance kicking would have helped? Clerc is especially good at scoring tries like that...
stroudos March 05, 2012 12:00 pm
stroudos March 05, 2012 12:16 pm
My understanding is he honed his aerial ability playing gaelic football when he was younger. If that's the case, I reckon a season in the GAA should be compulsory for all up-and-coming fullbacks!
Huh!! the 3rd March 05, 2012 1:42 pm

Every position on a gaelic team is akin to a fullback and most Irish 15s have a GAA background (Dempsey, Murphy, Duffy, Bowe, etc) aswell as Keith Wood who was a gifted underage GAA player.
Little known fact, Zinzan Brooke, 1 of the best back rows to have ever played, played gaelic football growing up in Auckland. Thats where he devoloped his incredible skills including how to drop a goal((hate to bring that up English fans), and why he could virtually play in most positions.
stroudos March 05, 2012 5:56 pm
Surely that should say "a lame drop goal attempt"?!?
dave March 05, 2012 8:16 pm

mise March 05, 2012 11:20 pm

Not sure i'd say most have a GAA background, though many do and it does help with 'fielding' ie catching high balls, for sure.
But wtf will ireland do without o connell?? he has been back to his best, and they kinda need him against that Scottish 2nd row...
Huh!! the 3rd March 06, 2012 1:13 am

What about O'Connell????? I'm in the mines in Aussieland and this is news to me. And I'd say Boss is ahead of O'Leary anyway.
I was also just pointing out 15s, bar Wood and Brook, and Horgan sucked anyway so I'd ignore his GAA contribution (can't even kick a rugby ball without massive luck on his part).
Pretzel March 06, 2012 1:31 am
I didn't notice during the game, so maybe it developed afterwards or something.
Not good news for Ireland, although Ryan isn't exactly a bad replacement. Not POC, but not bad...
mise March 06, 2012 1:49 am

Its more that the bench is depleted now Pretzel: that, coupled with kidney's conservative nature means we're going to be short come 60 mins.
(conservatism: e.g tom hayes is nowhere near getting a look in - not even for the wolfhounds. Like Mike Ross when he was at quins)
@huh: shaggy wasn't our best back, but he wasn't all bad (!)
Pretzel March 06, 2012 5:38 am
.....He says with the power of the internet at his fingertips but with no motivation to search himself...
mise March 06, 2012 2:01 am

The LD March 06, 2012 6:11 pm

From Gerry Thornley in today's Irishtimes:
"For the 55 minutes from the 24th to the 79th minutes, Pearson’s penalty count was eight-nil to the home team."
Munsterfan March 07, 2012 12:01 pm
















Commenting as Guest | Register or Login