Sunday, October 21, 2012
Pieter Dixon's red card after TMO recommendation rules kick to face

Before yesterday’s Currie Cup semifinal, the last time the Natal Sharks and the Blue Bulls met was on a miserably wet day in Durban last month. On that occasion the Sharks ended with 14 players after former Bath stalwart Pieter Dixon was red carded.
Dixon, who spent many years at Western Province and with the Stormers before heading over to the UK to play over 150 matches for Bath, returned to South Africa earlier this year.
The 35 year-old was brought in as the Sharks were missing hookers due to injury and Springbok duty. Dixon has relocated to where he was schooled, and his experience speaks for itself, including a Springbok tour match when they travelled to Argentina and the UK early in his career.
Near the end of the Bulls game he made contact with the head of flanker Arno Botha as the players fell in the wet conditions. Referee Mark Lawrence referred the potential foul play incident to TMO Johann Meuwesen, who had many looks at it and recommended a red card for the kick to the face.
Dixon later faced a disciplinary hearing and after acknowledging that his boot came into contact with Botha's face, stated that it was accidental. He was cleared of any wrongdoing as on the balance of probability, the kick was deemed to be unintentional, and the red card decision was incorrect.
The card was scraped from Dixon's record, and would not be taken into account should he appear in future disciplinary hearings again. As a result, he was free to play their next game.
Unfortunately a week later against Free State, Dixon broke his arm 12 minutes into the match.
This isn't very current news but it was quite a talking point at the time and some of you (especially Bath fans) asked to see it, so below is a short clip of the incident
Posted at 10:35 am | 19 comments
Posted in Big Hits & Dirty Play
|
|
Viewing 19 comments
katman October 21, 2012 1:06 pm
Browner October 28, 2012 12:41 am

law 22.4.[f] says illegal so he should never have attempted it .... 100% RED
Guy October 21, 2012 2:04 pm

I am curious though as to what the TMO told the ref exactly. And why precisely this ruling was overturned by the citing commission.
Canadian content October 21, 2012 4:41 pm

I hate the professional attitude of trying to do something reckless to get a competitive edge, injuring or coming close to injuring someone, and then whining about being penalized for it (for example; league style tackles that start at the chest and end at the neck, reckless challenges in the air).
Everyone's health is more important than any scoreline, sorry
FoXtroT October 21, 2012 7:49 pm
Rugbydump October 21, 2012 9:50 pm
Pretzel October 22, 2012 1:08 am
Pretzel October 21, 2012 9:20 pm
However missing and kicking a player in the face is surely deemed reckless...
If you intentionally kick a player in the face then it is surely a red card... but we don't judge on intent, we judge on outcome..isn't that right?
I think maybe a red was the right call (imo) for recklessness, but I wouldn't call for any further ban...
Elizabeth Leiper October 21, 2012 10:14 pm

It's surely not normal practice to kick the ball out of someone's arms! If the ball carrier was holding on then the ref would whistle up a penalty for not releasing yeah?..so why go kicking at the ball?? I think his red card should be re-instated.
George W October 21, 2012 11:11 pm

Pretzel October 25, 2012 5:55 pm
It of course was not a backstreet brawl headbutt where someones nose ends up pointing out the back of their head, but to some degree it WAS, by definition a headbutt..
Elizabeth Leiper October 22, 2012 12:14 pm

Benny October 22, 2012 7:13 pm

Benny October 28, 2012 6:04 pm

Browner October 28, 2012 12:37 am

LAW 10.4.[c] ...foul play
Easy decision ...RED CARD
Browner October 28, 2012 12:43 am

NO ! 22.4.[f]
Harry November 06, 2012 3:49 am
















Commenting as Guest | Register or Login