Wednesday, March 13, 2013
Martin Bayfield gives practical demonstration of the tip-tackle law
Following the recent red card - and subsequent suspension - for Gloucester's Darren Dawidiuk, Martin Bayfield and Craig Doyle put together this handy practical explanation for those of us wondering why we see certain tackles ruled as dangerous these days.
Bayfield chatted to the referee after that game and this is how he explained the current rulings.
"What we're looking at is not the intent of the player, it's basically what happens. If you pick a player up off his feet, and he goes to the ground, whether you drive him into the ground or not.. if you let go of him and he hits the ground, upper chest, upper back to the head, it's a red card.
"As soon as you lift a player up to parallel, you are into penalty area," added Bayfield.
It sounds extremely difficult to make dominant tackles when it's explained like that, but these laws are put in place for player safety, so as long as you're not lifting both legs up and bringing a player parallel to the ground, it seems like you'll be okay, and so will he.
What are your thoughts on the above explanation, and the current law regarding the tip-tackle?
Posted at 11:00 am | 6 comments
Posted in Big Hits & Dirty Play
|
|
Viewing 6 comments
Matt March 13, 2013 5:11 pm

"Lifting a player from the ground and dropping or driving that player into the ground whilst that player’s feet are still off the ground such that the player’s head and/or upper body come into contact with the ground is dangerous play"
Specifically, there is a clear requirement that "the player’s head and/or upper body come into contact with the ground". So, in the case that the player is dropped the "right" way up, as Martin Bayfield demonstrates at the end of the clip, there should - contrary to what he suggests - be no penalty at all.
Mbell1012 March 13, 2013 6:14 pm

glasgowexile March 13, 2013 9:55 pm

Almost as annoying as those commentators who still look for "downward pressure" on TMO try decisions.
thunor March 17, 2013 2:45 pm

You still hear it mentioned, but to a lesser extent. I think some (most?) of them have realised it was nonsense.
John Davies March 29, 2013 10:59 am

John Davies March 30, 2013 1:31 am
















Commenting as Guest | Register or Login